<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hugo vs Homer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2008/04/hugo-vs-homer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2008/04/hugo-vs-homer/</link>
	<description>for free expression</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:09:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eloy Sanpitierri</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2008/04/hugo-vs-homer/comment-page-1/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>Eloy Sanpitierri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=325#comment-356</guid>
		<description>People outside Venezuela have no idea how bad is La Hojilla.  It is the perfect complement to a censorship policy: a place where you can insult and calumniate people without the victims been able to defend themselves, not even through the courts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People outside Venezuela have no idea how bad is La Hojilla.  It is the perfect complement to a censorship policy: a place where you can insult and calumniate people without the victims been able to defend themselves, not even through the courts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ishkatae</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2008/04/hugo-vs-homer/comment-page-1/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>Ishkatae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=325#comment-353</guid>
		<description>And tinkerKenny has also missed that point that Simpsons will be replaced by Baywatch, so why is CONATEL not disciplining Televen for Baywatch? Or I take it you have no objection to sexist shows shown at 11am?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And tinkerKenny has also missed that point that Simpsons will be replaced by Baywatch, so why is CONATEL not disciplining Televen for Baywatch? Or I take it you have no objection to sexist shows shown at 11am?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random News Table &#124; Uncle Bear</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2008/04/hugo-vs-homer/comment-page-1/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Random News Table &#124; Uncle Bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 06:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=325#comment-351</guid>
		<description>[...] Index on Censorship » Hugo vs Homer The Simpsons has been taken off Venezuelan television. Is this because the regime doesn’t like the programme, or because they just don’t get it, asks Daniel Duquenal (tags: simpsons corpolitical) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Index on Censorship » Hugo vs Homer The Simpsons has been taken off Venezuelan television. Is this because the regime doesn’t like the programme, or because they just don’t get it, asks Daniel Duquenal (tags: simpsons corpolitical) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Segundo Alvarez</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2008/04/hugo-vs-homer/comment-page-1/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Segundo Alvarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=325#comment-350</guid>
		<description>TinkerKenny

I think that the point of the author is that grossly offensive shows as La Hojilla do whatever they want even if they break all ethical and legal rules. 

IT is clear that the Venezuela regulatory agency has two standards, one for the private media and one for the media subjected to Chavez.  Or better said, there are no standards for state media.  The Simpsons case is a good example.  That should be worrisome to anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TinkerKenny</p>
<p>I think that the point of the author is that grossly offensive shows as La Hojilla do whatever they want even if they break all ethical and legal rules. </p>
<p>IT is clear that the Venezuela regulatory agency has two standards, one for the private media and one for the media subjected to Chavez.  Or better said, there are no standards for state media.  The Simpsons case is a good example.  That should be worrisome to anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imaginativa</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2008/04/hugo-vs-homer/comment-page-1/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>imaginativa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=325#comment-349</guid>
		<description>I think tinkerKenny is missing the point of the Simpsons censorship. It is not children´s show true, but it should be allowed late at night for  the right audience. Mr. Chavez wants it out of the program all together, what´s funny is that the show has been around longer than the Chavez goverment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think tinkerKenny is missing the point of the Simpsons censorship. It is not children´s show true, but it should be allowed late at night for  the right audience. Mr. Chavez wants it out of the program all together, what´s funny is that the show has been around longer than the Chavez goverment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TinkerKenny</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2008/04/hugo-vs-homer/comment-page-1/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>TinkerKenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=325#comment-348</guid>
		<description>Come on now, having &quot;childrens hours&quot; is not outright censorship. Nothing is stopping the channel from moving the show to an evening time slot. You can argue whether or not the Simpsons  should be moved at all, but if you agree that any time restrictions are censorship, you&#039;d have to condemn just about every country in the world.

I&#039;m from Mexico and the Simpsons are not consdiered &quot;family programing&quot; the way that it is in the states. Disrespect of family members is taken much more seriously there. It&#039;s still popular but not generally considered a show kids should be watching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on now, having &#8220;childrens hours&#8221; is not outright censorship. Nothing is stopping the channel from moving the show to an evening time slot. You can argue whether or not the Simpsons  should be moved at all, but if you agree that any time restrictions are censorship, you&#8217;d have to condemn just about every country in the world.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m from Mexico and the Simpsons are not consdiered &#8220;family programing&#8221; the way that it is in the states. Disrespect of family members is taken much more seriously there. It&#8217;s still popular but not generally considered a show kids should be watching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 402/403 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.indexoncensorship.org @ 2012-02-09 10:37:11 -->
