<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia page blocked over image of naked child.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2008/12/wikipedia-page-blocked-over-image-of-naked-child/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2008/12/wikipedia-page-blocked-over-image-of-naked-child/</link>
	<description>for free expression</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:09:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virgin Killer</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2008/12/wikipedia-page-blocked-over-image-of-naked-child/comment-page-1/#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>Virgin Killer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=987#comment-928</guid>
		<description>Blind Faith of zealots 

The design clearly tried to provoke the establishment and it is not a design I would use, but contrary the image has not been blocked. It is accesible via Wikipedia at http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/33/Virgin_Killer.jpg and thousands of other places on the net. Note that only the article discussing this vintage album cover sleeve was blocked by the Blind Faith Zealots from Cambridge (UK), home of puritans.

Blocking this image runs contrary to the freedom of information we expect from the Internet. People who find this image to disturbing should grow up or not look at it. I don&#039;t think that this childish action by the IWF has any impact on Paedophiles and other perverts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blind Faith of zealots </p>
<p>The design clearly tried to provoke the establishment and it is not a design I would use, but contrary the image has not been blocked. It is accesible via Wikipedia at <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/33/Virgin_Killer.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/33/Virgin_Killer.jpg</a> and thousands of other places on the net. Note that only the article discussing this vintage album cover sleeve was blocked by the Blind Faith Zealots from Cambridge (UK), home of puritans.</p>
<p>Blocking this image runs contrary to the freedom of information we expect from the Internet. People who find this image to disturbing should grow up or not look at it. I don&#8217;t think that this childish action by the IWF has any impact on Paedophiles and other perverts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 317/318 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.indexoncensorship.org @ 2012-02-09 17:55:06 -->
