The problem is not the law, but its interpretation. My view as a litigant in person in the libel court is that the Judges are being pressured by the lawyers to make orders on tenuous and even non-existent Article 8 grounds.
They are therefore setting a dangerous precedent. Privacy laws are being developed to help provide a new source of income for libel lawyers at a time when there are fewer libel cases.

So when the next rich client with something to hide seeks legal advice, he will be told that he will likely succeed in keeping it secret, as Trafigura was likely told. Was Article 8 used to get the injunction granted?

Now as for how costs are used tactically and strategically in English litigation to stop legit claims for libel, I have alot to say about that as well!! Come to my next hearing on 23 October, likely in Court 12 and I will have a lot to say after orders were made in secret against me last Friday, the 16th October, in my absence.

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmcumeds/memo/press/ucps3902.htm

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmcumeds/memo/press/ucps5302.htm