<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital bankruptcy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/11/digital-bankruptcy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/11/digital-bankruptcy/</link>
	<description>for free expression</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:09:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Arnold</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/11/digital-bankruptcy/comment-page-1/#comment-1654</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=6398#comment-1654</guid>
		<description>How about we have a week where no one buys, sells, hires or otherwise puts any money into the creative industries to see what impact that will have on the revenues of the large &quot;rights holders&quot;?

If loss of earnings is their main concern, such an action will hit where it hurts most, their bank balance.  They can think about what a month of such action will mean to them (or longer).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about we have a week where no one buys, sells, hires or otherwise puts any money into the creative industries to see what impact that will have on the revenues of the large &#8220;rights holders&#8221;?</p>
<p>If loss of earnings is their main concern, such an action will hit where it hurts most, their bank balance.  They can think about what a month of such action will mean to them (or longer).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alastair Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/11/digital-bankruptcy/comment-page-1/#comment-1653</link>
		<dc:creator>Alastair Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=6398#comment-1653</guid>
		<description>We may of course be allowed to vote online. You only need a modem for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We may of course be allowed to vote online. You only need a modem for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cyberdoyle</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/11/digital-bankruptcy/comment-page-1/#comment-1652</link>
		<dc:creator>cyberdoyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=6398#comment-1652</guid>
		<description>Well written as usual Bill. Just a shame that these policy makers just don&#039;t understand the internet at all. They seem hell bent on propping up an obsolete business model, and as you say, &#039;breaking our internet&#039;.
Maybe because they have spent so much on the banking fiasco and can&#039;t afford to modernise the obsolete copper infrastructure our broadband comes through they are gonna block access and then we don&#039;t need it? No point in spending money on infrastructure if all we are going to be allowed to do is email, tweet and browse eGov sites.
Turn off the lights as you leave. Goodbye digital Britain. Goodbye innovation. Goodbye digital economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well written as usual Bill. Just a shame that these policy makers just don&#8217;t understand the internet at all. They seem hell bent on propping up an obsolete business model, and as you say, &#8216;breaking our internet&#8217;.<br />
Maybe because they have spent so much on the banking fiasco and can&#8217;t afford to modernise the obsolete copper infrastructure our broadband comes through they are gonna block access and then we don&#8217;t need it? No point in spending money on infrastructure if all we are going to be allowed to do is email, tweet and browse eGov sites.<br />
Turn off the lights as you leave. Goodbye digital Britain. Goodbye innovation. Goodbye digital economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo public</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/11/digital-bankruptcy/comment-page-1/#comment-1650</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo public</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=6398#comment-1650</guid>
		<description>Three strikes and you are out should trialled on politicians first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three strikes and you are out should trialled on politicians first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 368/369 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.indexoncensorship.org @ 2012-02-09 11:23:15 -->
