<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama acts to defend US from UK libel laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/08/obama-speech-act-libel-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/08/obama-speech-act-libel-reform/</link>
	<description>for free expression</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:22:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victory for free speech as libel reform bill passes &#124; Index on Censorship</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/08/obama-speech-act-libel-reform/#comment-24303</link>
		<dc:creator>Victory for free speech as libel reform bill passes &#124; Index on Censorship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=14868#comment-24303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the centre of some of the most contentious libel cases of recent times, has retired. Barack Obama signed the SPEECH Act, a US law specifically designed to protect Americans from London libel rulings. And the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the centre of some of the most contentious libel cases of recent times, has retired. Barack Obama signed the SPEECH Act, a US law specifically designed to protect Americans from London libel rulings. And the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Britain’s half-hearted bid to reform libel law &#124; Index on Censorship</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/08/obama-speech-act-libel-reform/#comment-14474</link>
		<dc:creator>Britain’s half-hearted bid to reform libel law &#124; Index on Censorship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 10:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=14868#comment-14474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] American journalists, authors and publishers from the enforcement of any foreign libel judgments.The Speech Act that was passed unanimously by the US Congress and signed into law in the summer of 2010 protects [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] American journalists, authors and publishers from the enforcement of any foreign libel judgments.The Speech Act that was passed unanimously by the US Congress and signed into law in the summer of 2010 protects [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Index on Censorship &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Libel reform: a final push</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/08/obama-speech-act-libel-reform/#comment-7955</link>
		<dc:creator>Index on Censorship &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Libel reform: a final push</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=14868#comment-7955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is removing the UK&#8217;s pariah status. So bad was English law that the US Congress introduced special measures to protect Americans from courts in London, seen as dismissive of the fundamental right to freedom of expression. When the culture select [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is removing the UK&#8217;s pariah status. So bad was English law that the US Congress introduced special measures to protect Americans from courts in London, seen as dismissive of the fundamental right to freedom of expression. When the culture select [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tweed</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/08/obama-speech-act-libel-reform/#comment-2589</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tweed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 14:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=14868#comment-2589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The signing of the Speech Act by President Obama is the final endorsement of what has been the most effective and concentrated lobbying campaign since that orchestrated by the tobacco industry some years ago.  The priority afforded to this US “Libel Tourism” legislation is as inappropriate and unnecessary as it is bewildering.  As a UK/Irish media lawyer of more than 30 years standing, I have never once sought to enforce a UK libel judgment in the US, and I am still waiting to be advised of one single example of such an attempt by any other practitioner.

As the lobbying campaign is continuing to be driven by the publishing industry in the UK, I again have to ask the question.......what could possibly have justified such a high profile campaign, in circumstances where the number of libel actions brought by international personalities in the UK has been negligible?  Notwithstanding this scenario, we have this media frenzy persistently criticising our defamation laws – legislation which, in my respectful opinion, has contributed in no small measure to ensuring that our broadsheets are among the most credible in the world.  In the absence of such laws, it would effectively be impossible for the man on the street to have access to any form of justice, while encouraging the often one sided propaganda that is regularly exhibited in the American press.

Whilst I have absolutely no problem with a fair and balanced debate, the hysteria emanating from certain sections of our press is both misleading and mischievous, and is geared more to protecting the financial interests of publishers, rather than having any reasonable justification. 

On another note, now that comity appears to have been thrown out the window, it will be interesting to see how the President and Congress react if and when any similar moves are made by other countries to undermine and circumvent US laws!  

Paul Tweed
Senior Partner
Johnsons Solicitors
 
Belfast &#124; Dublin &#124; London
 
w:            www.johnsonslaw.com
b:            www.globallibeldebate.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The signing of the Speech Act by President Obama is the final endorsement of what has been the most effective and concentrated lobbying campaign since that orchestrated by the tobacco industry some years ago.  The priority afforded to this US “Libel Tourism” legislation is as inappropriate and unnecessary as it is bewildering.  As a UK/Irish media lawyer of more than 30 years standing, I have never once sought to enforce a UK libel judgment in the US, and I am still waiting to be advised of one single example of such an attempt by any other practitioner.</p>
<p>As the lobbying campaign is continuing to be driven by the publishing industry in the UK, I again have to ask the question&#8230;&#8230;.what could possibly have justified such a high profile campaign, in circumstances where the number of libel actions brought by international personalities in the UK has been negligible?  Notwithstanding this scenario, we have this media frenzy persistently criticising our defamation laws – legislation which, in my respectful opinion, has contributed in no small measure to ensuring that our broadsheets are among the most credible in the world.  In the absence of such laws, it would effectively be impossible for the man on the street to have access to any form of justice, while encouraging the often one sided propaganda that is regularly exhibited in the American press.</p>
<p>Whilst I have absolutely no problem with a fair and balanced debate, the hysteria emanating from certain sections of our press is both misleading and mischievous, and is geared more to protecting the financial interests of publishers, rather than having any reasonable justification. </p>
<p>On another note, now that comity appears to have been thrown out the window, it will be interesting to see how the President and Congress react if and when any similar moves are made by other countries to undermine and circumvent US laws!  </p>
<p>Paul Tweed<br />
Senior Partner<br />
Johnsons Solicitors</p>
<p>Belfast | Dublin | London</p>
<p>w:            <a href="http://www.johnsonslaw.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.johnsonslaw.com</a><br />
b:            <a href="http://www.globallibeldebate.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.globallibeldebate.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Special Relationship&#8230;Barack Obama signs law snubbing UK libel judgments &#171; Melon Farmers Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/08/obama-speech-act-libel-reform/#comment-2587</link>
		<dc:creator>Special Relationship&#8230;Barack Obama signs law snubbing UK libel judgments &#171; Melon Farmers Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=14868#comment-2587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] on article [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on article [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: www.indexoncensorship.org @ 2013-05-18 21:28:11 by W3 Total Cache --