<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: United Kingdom: David Cameron considers banning rioters from social media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2011/08/united-kingdom-david-cameron-considers-banning-rioters-from-social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2011/08/united-kingdom-david-cameron-considers-banning-rioters-from-social-media/</link>
	<description>for free expression</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:22:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: louis della-porta</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2011/08/united-kingdom-david-cameron-considers-banning-rioters-from-social-media/#comment-6157</link>
		<dc:creator>louis della-porta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 04:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=25515#comment-6157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We bans guns and knives on our streets etc because whilst they can be used for peaceful purposes, they can also be used for harming people. The logic with the mis-use of social media is similar - where it was used to exacerbate criminal acts.
Freedom of expression is to be highly valued, but it doesn&#039;t come with a license to do anything. Crime is not a freedom of expression. With F of E comes a counterbalance of responsibility not to mis-use that freedom.
Perhaps the social media should be public, allowing the public to censor it rather than the authorites. So the collective &#039;good&#039; who understand responsibility that goes with freedom can decide to shut it down, rather than government etc]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We bans guns and knives on our streets etc because whilst they can be used for peaceful purposes, they can also be used for harming people. The logic with the mis-use of social media is similar &#8211; where it was used to exacerbate criminal acts.<br />
Freedom of expression is to be highly valued, but it doesn&#8217;t come with a license to do anything. Crime is not a freedom of expression. With F of E comes a counterbalance of responsibility not to mis-use that freedom.<br />
Perhaps the social media should be public, allowing the public to censor it rather than the authorites. So the collective &#8216;good&#8217; who understand responsibility that goes with freedom can decide to shut it down, rather than government etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: www.indexoncensorship.org @ 2013-05-18 23:41:12 by W3 Total Cache --