<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Communications Data Bill: Setback for UK government as &#8220;snooper&#8217;s charter&#8221; slammed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/12/snoopers-charter-theresa-may-communications-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/12/snoopers-charter-theresa-may-communications-data/</link>
	<description>for free expression</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:22:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Netizen Report: Surveillance Edition - Global Voices Advocacy</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/12/snoopers-charter-theresa-may-communications-data/#comment-19282</link>
		<dc:creator>Netizen Report: Surveillance Edition - Global Voices Advocacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 02:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=43207#comment-19282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] One particular clause the Joint Committee expressed concern over would, by a measure of “future proofing,” grant the Home Secretary the ability to strengthen the already powerful bill without the consent of parliament. The Joint Committee likened the clause to “surveillance tactics carried out by authoritarian states such as Belarus and Kazakhstan.” [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One particular clause the Joint Committee expressed concern over would, by a measure of “future proofing,” grant the Home Secretary the ability to strengthen the already powerful bill without the consent of parliament. The Joint Committee likened the clause to “surveillance tactics carried out by authoritarian states such as Belarus and Kazakhstan.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UK &#34;snooper&#039;s charter&#34; to be redrafted - Index on Censorship</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/12/snoopers-charter-theresa-may-communications-data/#comment-18831</link>
		<dc:creator>UK &#34;snooper&#039;s charter&#34; to be redrafted - Index on Censorship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=43207#comment-18831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] about this storyYou can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.&#171; Communications Data Bill: Setback for UK government as &#8220;snooper&#8217;s charter&#8221; slammed&#160;&#8226;&#160;Tags: Communications Data Bill, privacy, Snoopers charter, UKCOMMENTS (0)Respond [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about this storyYou can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.&laquo; Communications Data Bill: Setback for UK government as &#8220;snooper&#8217;s charter&#8221; slammed&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;Tags: Communications Data Bill, privacy, Snoopers charter, UKCOMMENTS (0)Respond [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: www.indexoncensorship.org @ 2013-05-17 20:56:00 by W3 Total Cache --