<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social media and free speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/12/social-media-prosecution-dpp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/12/social-media-prosecution-dpp/</link>
	<description>for free expression</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:22:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Report #18: John Cooper QC on the CPS guidelines on social media &#171; Charon QC&#039;s UK Law Tour</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/12/social-media-prosecution-dpp/#comment-19371</link>
		<dc:creator>Report #18: John Cooper QC on the CPS guidelines on social media &#171; Charon QC&#039;s UK Law Tour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=43378#comment-19371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Today, I talk to John Cooper QC about the CPS guidelines on Social Media.  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Today, I talk to John Cooper QC about the CPS guidelines on Social Media.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tour Lawcast 14: John Cooper QC on the CPS guidelines on social media &#171; Charon QC</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/12/social-media-prosecution-dpp/#comment-19370</link>
		<dc:creator>Tour Lawcast 14: John Cooper QC on the CPS guidelines on social media &#171; Charon QC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 13:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=43378#comment-19370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Today, I talk to John Cooper QC about the CPS guidelines on Social Media.  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Today, I talk to John Cooper QC about the CPS guidelines on Social Media.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DPP Slams Twitter Joke Trial QC For ‘Cheap Points’ And Failure To Grasp ‘Sophistication&#8217; Of Social Media Issues &#124; Legal Cheek</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/12/social-media-prosecution-dpp/#comment-19206</link>
		<dc:creator>DPP Slams Twitter Joke Trial QC For ‘Cheap Points’ And Failure To Grasp ‘Sophistication&#8217; Of Social Media Issues &#124; Legal Cheek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 12:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=43378#comment-19206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] got things underway by ridiculing the DPP&#039;s new social media prosecution guidelines, which he described as &quot;the longest ever explanation of common sense I’ve [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] got things underway by ridiculing the DPP&#039;s new social media prosecution guidelines, which he described as &quot;the longest ever explanation of common sense I’ve [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: High threshold set for social media prosecutions - Index on Censorship</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/12/social-media-prosecution-dpp/#comment-19202</link>
		<dc:creator>High threshold set for social media prosecutions - Index on Censorship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 10:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=43378#comment-19202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] about this storyYou can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.&#171; Social media and free speech&#160;&#8226;&#160;Tags: Azhar Ahmed, Communications Act 2003, Facebook, free expression, internet [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about this storyYou can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.&laquo; Social media and free speech&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;Tags: Azhar Ahmed, Communications Act 2003, Facebook, free expression, internet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morning Round-Up: Wednesday 19 December &#124; Legal Cheek</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/12/social-media-prosecution-dpp/#comment-19201</link>
		<dc:creator>Morning Round-Up: Wednesday 19 December &#124; Legal Cheek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 08:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=43378#comment-19201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] reaction so far to the new Twitter and Facebook social media prosecution guidelines from top media lawyers [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reaction so far to the new Twitter and Facebook social media prosecution guidelines from top media lawyers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: www.indexoncensorship.org @ 2013-05-18 07:14:40 by W3 Total Cache --