<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Index on Censorship’s response to the Leveson report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2013/02/index-on-censorship-leveson-inquiry-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2013/02/index-on-censorship-leveson-inquiry-report/</link>
	<description>for free expression</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:22:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Index responds to the Royal Charter &#124; Index on Censorship</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2013/02/index-on-censorship-leveson-inquiry-report/#comment-22828</link>
		<dc:creator>Index responds to the Royal Charter &#124; Index on Censorship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=42580#comment-22828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Read our analysis of the Leveson Inquiry report&#8217;s recommendations here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read our analysis of the Leveson Inquiry report&#8217;s recommendations here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LED Lighting News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Leveson&#8217;s liberal friends bring shame upon the left &#124; Nick Cohen</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2013/02/index-on-censorship-leveson-inquiry-report/#comment-22624</link>
		<dc:creator>LED Lighting News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Leveson&#8217;s liberal friends bring shame upon the left &#124; Nick Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 09:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=42580#comment-22624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and kill investigative journalism stone dead – and, now I come to think of it, more babies too. Index on Censorship, English PEN and the Committee to Protect Journalists say that basic freedoms are in danger. Like a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and kill investigative journalism stone dead – and, now I come to think of it, more babies too. Index on Censorship, English PEN and the Committee to Protect Journalists say that basic freedoms are in danger. Like a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leveson&#039;s liberal friends bring shame upon the left &#124; Nick Cohen - Government Tenders, Government News and Information - Government Online</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2013/02/index-on-censorship-leveson-inquiry-report/#comment-22623</link>
		<dc:creator>Leveson&#039;s liberal friends bring shame upon the left &#124; Nick Cohen - Government Tenders, Government News and Information - Government Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 08:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=42580#comment-22623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and kill investigative journalism stone dead – and, now I come to think of it, more babies too. Index on Censorship, English PEN and the Committee to Protect Journalists say that basic freedoms are in danger. Like a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and kill investigative journalism stone dead – and, now I come to think of it, more babies too. Index on Censorship, English PEN and the Committee to Protect Journalists say that basic freedoms are in danger. Like a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leveson&#039;s liberal friends bring shame upon the left &#124; Nick Cohen &#124; Latest News ChannelLatest News Channel</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2013/02/index-on-censorship-leveson-inquiry-report/#comment-22622</link>
		<dc:creator>Leveson&#039;s liberal friends bring shame upon the left &#124; Nick Cohen &#124; Latest News ChannelLatest News Channel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 06:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=42580#comment-22622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] kill investigative journalism stone dead &#8211; and, now I come to think of it, more babies too. Index on Censorship, English PEN and the Committee to Protect Journalists say that basic freedoms are in danger. Like a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] kill investigative journalism stone dead &ndash; and, now I come to think of it, more babies too. Index on Censorship, English PEN and the Committee to Protect Journalists say that basic freedoms are in danger. Like a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Flaherty</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2013/02/index-on-censorship-leveson-inquiry-report/#comment-18254</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Flaherty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=42580#comment-18254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I meant the Desmond problem, not the Dacre problem. If there is indeed a Dacre problem it&#039;s not the one I meant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant the Desmond problem, not the Dacre problem. If there is indeed a Dacre problem it&#8217;s not the one I meant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Flaherty</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2013/02/index-on-censorship-leveson-inquiry-report/#comment-18252</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Flaherty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=42580#comment-18252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve checked out your analysis of the voluntary nature of any new regulatory body and it seems you are correct. It seems the recommendations are designed to encourage full participation by making full participation a requirement. How this will work in practice is probably that OfCom (or whoever is assigned the validator role) will require the industry to keep plugging away at a new regulator until it is able to gain full membership of all the significant news publishers. In that respect, it is still entirely voluntary in its design, but will eliminate the Dacre problem. 

I&#039;m not sure it is quite the catch-22 you perceive, as full membership has always been the ultimate aim. The statutory underpinning merely requires that the industry agrees on a regulator that is sufficiently independent and effective, which has so far been its failing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve checked out your analysis of the voluntary nature of any new regulatory body and it seems you are correct. It seems the recommendations are designed to encourage full participation by making full participation a requirement. How this will work in practice is probably that OfCom (or whoever is assigned the validator role) will require the industry to keep plugging away at a new regulator until it is able to gain full membership of all the significant news publishers. In that respect, it is still entirely voluntary in its design, but will eliminate the Dacre problem. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure it is quite the catch-22 you perceive, as full membership has always been the ultimate aim. The statutory underpinning merely requires that the industry agrees on a regulator that is sufficiently independent and effective, which has so far been its failing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why is it left to the Tory leader to stick up for a liberal principle: a free press</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2013/02/index-on-censorship-leveson-inquiry-report/#comment-18215</link>
		<dc:creator>Why is it left to the Tory leader to stick up for a liberal principle: a free press</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=42580#comment-18215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Index on Censorship did speak for me: Index on Censorship opposes recommendations for the statutory underpinning of press [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Index on Censorship did speak for me: Index on Censorship opposes recommendations for the statutory underpinning of press [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: www.indexoncensorship.org @ 2013-05-18 07:12:06 by W3 Total Cache --