Comments on: Leveson debate must be brought back from brink

By: The Leveson Inquiry: Is placing statutory regulation on the press a good idea? | Hong Kong Law Blog

Wed, 17 Apr 2013 06:51:15 +0000

[...] http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2013/03/leveson-debate-must-be-brought-back-from-brink/#more-44917 [...]

By: Freedom of the press and statutory regulation – Finland, Denmark and Ireland | Inforrm's Blog

Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:54:56 +0000

[...] The introduction by the cross party agreement of statutory provisions supporting a Royal Charter setting up a “Recognition Panel” (see our post here) has led, once again, to complaints that any political involvement in press regulation – however indirect – is incompatible with press freedom. For example, the Chief Executive of Index on Censorship, Kirsty Hughes, has argued that [...]

By: Freedom of the press and statutory regulation – lessons from Finland? | Inforrm's Blog

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:22:37 +0000

[...] The introduction by the cross party agreement of statutory provisions supporting a Royal Charter setting up a “Recognition Panel” (see our post here) has led, once again, to complaints that any political involvement in press regulation – however indirect – is incompatible with press freedom. The Chief Executive of Index on Censorship, Kirsty Hughes, has argued that [...]

By: Index responds to Leveson Royal Charter | Index on Censorship

Index responds to Leveson Royal Charter | Index on Censorship — Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:06:12 +0000

[...] ALSO READ KIRSTY HUGHES ANALYSIS OF THE PRINCIPLES AT STAKE IN ROYAL CHARTER DEBATE [...]

By: Leveson deal marks a ‘sad day for press freedom’, says Index on Censorship ~ Telegraph | Stop Making Sense

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:00:13 +0000

[...] Hughes, chief executive of the Index on Censorship, said the deal means politicians have power over the [...]