<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Index on Censorship &#187; High Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/tag/high-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org</link>
	<description>for free expression</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:22:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/4.0.8" -->
	<itunes:summary>for free expression</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Index on Censorship</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>for free expression</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>UK: Julian Assange loses appeal against extradition</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2011/11/uk-julian-assange-appeal-wikileaks-extradition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2011/11/uk-julian-assange-appeal-wikileaks-extradition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 11:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alice Purkiss</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe and Central Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Index Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minipost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extradition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=28573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has lost his UK High Court appeal against extradition to Sweden. Assange faces accusations of rape and sexual assault after a visit to Stockholm in August 2010. The judgement was handed down to the 40-year-old Australian by two High Court judges, following a European arrest warrant. Assange&#8217;s lawyers will take 14 days [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2011/11/uk-julian-assange-appeal-wikileaks-extradition/">UK: Julian Assange loses appeal against extradition</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a title="Wikileaks" href="http://wikileaks.org/" target="_blank">WikiLeaks</a> founder Julian Assange has lost his <a title="Guardian | Julian Assange loses appeal against extradition" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/nov/02/julian-assange-loses-appeal-extradition?newsfeed=true" target="_blank">UK High Court appeal</a> against extradition to <a title="Index on Censorship | Sweden" href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/tag/Sweden" target="_blank">Sweden</a>. Assange faces <a title="BBC | Wikileaks founder Julian Assange accused of rape" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-11047025" target="_blank">accusations of rape</a> and sexual assault after a visit to Stockholm in August 2010.

The judgement was handed down to the 40-year-old Australian by two High Court judges, following a European arrest warrant. Assange&#8217;s lawyers will take 14 days to decide whether to appeal further, and if he is denied the right to appeal, British law enforcement officers will arrange for his removal to Sweden within 10 days.<p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2011/11/uk-julian-assange-appeal-wikileaks-extradition/">UK: Julian Assange loses appeal against extradition</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2011/11/uk-julian-assange-appeal-wikileaks-extradition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google not liable for defamation</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/07/google-not-liable-for-defamation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/07/google-not-liable-for-defamation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Index on Censorship</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Index Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minipost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mr Justice Eady]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=4372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Google is not liable for defamatory comments that appear in news articles, blogs and forums displayed in its search results, a high court judge in London has concluded in a landmark ruling for UK defamation law. Mr Justice Eady ruled in a judgment in the high court that Google was a &#8220;facilitator&#8221; and not a [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/07/google-not-liable-for-defamation/">Google not liable for defamation</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Google is not liable for defamatory comments that appear in news articles, blogs and forums displayed in its search results, a high court judge in London has concluded in a landmark ruling for UK defamation law. Mr Justice Eady ruled in a judgment in the high court that Google was a &#8220;facilitator&#8221; and not a publisher of the content. Read more <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jul/20/google-defamation-high-court-ruling">here</a><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/07/google-not-liable-for-defamation/">Google not liable for defamation</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/07/google-not-liable-for-defamation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reporter Suzanne Breen wins Real IRA notes case</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/06/reporter-suzanne-breen-wins-real-ira-notes-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/06/reporter-suzanne-breen-wins-real-ira-notes-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Index on Censorship</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Index Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minipost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northern ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real IRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suzanne Breen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=3880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Belfast journalist, Suzanne Breen of the Sunday Tribune does not have to hand over her notes to the police, the High Court has ruled. A judge ruled that to give up her sources and material would endanger her life. Read more here</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/06/reporter-suzanne-breen-wins-real-ira-notes-case/">Reporter Suzanne Breen wins Real IRA notes case</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Belfast journalist, Suzanne Breen of the Sunday Tribune does not have to hand over her notes to the police, the High Court has ruled. A judge ruled that to give up her sources and material would endanger her life. Read more <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/8107230.stm">here</a><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/06/reporter-suzanne-breen-wins-real-ira-notes-case/">Reporter Suzanne Breen wins Real IRA notes case</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/06/reporter-suzanne-breen-wins-real-ira-notes-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: www.indexoncensorship.org @ 2013-05-18 13:49:34 by W3 Total Cache --