<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Index on Censorship &#187; insulting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/tag/insulting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org</link>
	<description>for free expression</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:22:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/4.0.8" -->
	<itunes:summary>for free expression</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Index on Censorship</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>for free expression</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>UK: Public Order Act may drop &#8220;insulting&#8221; as an offence</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/12/section-five-public-order-insult-offence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/12/section-five-public-order-insult-offence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daisy Williams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[minipost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News and Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insulting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keir Starmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Order Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 5]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=43206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Section 5 of the 1986 Public Order Act could be adjusted to remove the word &#8220;insulting&#8221; from legislation, it was announced today (10 December). Director of public prosecutions Keir Starmer has said that past cases could be classified as &#8220;abusive&#8221;, as opposed to &#8220;insulting&#8221;. Section 5 has stirred controversy in the past: in 2010, a Christian preacher was charged [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/12/section-five-public-order-insult-offence/">UK: Public Order Act may drop &#8220;insulting&#8221; as an offence</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Section 5 of the 1986 <a title="Index on Censorship - A twist in the tale of the man arrested for not smiling at the Olympics" href="http://blog.indexoncensorship.org/2012/08/10/olympics-smiling-parkinsons-london2012-arrest/" target="_blank">Public Order Act</a> could be adjusted to remove the word &#8220;insulting&#8221; from legislation, it was announced today (10 December). Director of public prosecutions Keir Starmer has said that past cases could be classified as &#8220;abusive&#8221;, as opposed to &#8220;insulting&#8221;. Section 5 has stirred <a title="Huffington Post - Public Order Act: Repeal Section 5 " href="http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/peter-g-tatchell/public-order-act-repeal-section-5_b_1209096.html" target="_blank">controversy</a> in the past: in 2010, a Christian preacher was <a title="Index on Censorship - “Offensive” speech should be met with argument, not arrest " href="http://blog.indexoncensorship.org/2010/05/06/dale-mcalpine-religion-homosexuality-offenc/" target="_blank">charged</a> with a public order offence for telling a police officer homosexuality was &#8220;a sin&#8221;. A Home Office spokesman told the <a title="Telegraph - Chief prosecutor supports scrapping law against insults " href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9734370/Chief-prosecutor-supports-scrapping-law-against-insults.html" target="_blank">Telegraph</a> that it had &#8220;consulted on removing &#8216;insulting&#8217; from the Act and was considering the responses.&#8221; The House of Lords will take a vote on the matter on Wednesday (12 December).<p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/12/section-five-public-order-insult-offence/">UK: Public Order Act may drop &#8220;insulting&#8221; as an offence</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/12/section-five-public-order-insult-offence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: www.indexoncensorship.org @ 2013-05-18 18:16:49 by W3 Total Cache --