<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Index on Censorship &#187; Internet Service Providers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/tag/internet-service-providers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org</link>
	<description>for free expression</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:40:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/4.0.8" -->
	<itunes:summary>for free expression</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Index on Censorship</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>for free expression</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>UK: BT and TalkTalk challenge Digital Economy Act</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/bt-judicial-review-digital-economy-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/bt-judicial-review-digital-economy-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Intern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Index Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minipost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Economy Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Service Providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=13916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Two of the United Kingdom&#8217;s largest internet service providers (ISPs) have requested a judicial review be launched into the Digital Economy Act. BT and TalkTalk claim that the act, designed to reduce internet piracy, contravenes European Union legislation. They say the act, which was rushed through parliament before the May general election, will force them to [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/bt-judicial-review-digital-economy-act/">UK: BT and TalkTalk challenge Digital Economy Act</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Two of the United Kingdom&#8217;s largest internet service providers (ISPs) have <a title="Metro: Digital Economy Act to be challenged by BT and TalkTalk" href="http://www.metro.co.uk/tech/834496-digital-economy-act-to-be-challenged-by-bt-and-talktalk" target="_blank">requested a judicial review</a> be launched into the <a title="Office of Public Sector Information: Digital Economy Act 2010" href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2010/ukpga_20100024_en_1" target="_blank">Digital Economy Act</a>. BT and TalkTalk claim that the act, designed to reduce internet piracy, contravenes European Union legislation. They say the act, which was <a title="The Times: The legislative farce of the Digital Economy Act" href="http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article7093203.ece" target="_blank">rushed through parliament</a> before the May general election, will force them to disconnect customer subscriptions on copyright grounds. BT and TalkTalk claim the regulations <a title="ThinkQ: Talk Talk and BT want Digital Economy Act review" href="http://www.thinq.co.uk/2010/7/8/talk-talk-and-bt-want-digital-economy-act-review/" target="_blank">infringe basic rights and freedoms</a> whilst financially disadvantaging larger ISPs because the legislation <a title="BBC: BT and TalkTalk challenge Digital Economy Act" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/10542400.stm" target="_blank">will not apply</a> to ISPs with less than 400,000 subscribers.<p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/bt-judicial-review-digital-economy-act/">UK: BT and TalkTalk challenge Digital Economy Act</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/bt-judicial-review-digital-economy-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: www.indexoncensorship.org @ 2013-05-18 23:17:07 by W3 Total Cache --