Posts Tagged ‘Jack Straw’

Guidelines for super injunctions to be introduced

October 26th, 2009

Junior Justice Minister Bridget Prentice revealed on 21 October that Justice Secretary Jack Straw has called on senior judges and lawyers representing major newspapers to discuss the fit and proper use of super injunctions. It follows the issuing of a super injunction by the courts that inadvertently prevented the Guardian newspaper from reporting parliamentary proceedings. Although the Lord Chief Justice, Judge Judge, pointed out that some super injunctions were justified, Prentice nonetheless admitted to being “very concerned that super injunctions are being used more commonly”. Having appeased MPs by assurring them that their absolute right to address parliament was protected by law, Prentice said that further guidelines on the issuing of super injunctions might be useful to the judiciary.

UK: climbdown on secret inquests

May 15th, 2009

Justice secretary Jack Straw has announced the government will not go ahead with plans for non-jury private inquests to cover cases involving “sensitive information”. Read more here

Good on spin, bad on justice

April 30th, 2009

chris_ames_140x140jpg1 The Ministry of Justice was more concerned with spinning the ‘Titan prisons’ controversy than complying with its own Freedom of Information Act, says
Chris Ames

(more…)

Freedom of information when it suits

April 8th, 2009

chris_ames_140x140jpgWhy is British government trying to censor documents relating to the Iraq war it has already published, asks Chris Ames
(more…)

Plane evasion

February 26th, 2009

chris_ames_140x140jpgIt’s not just Jack Straw who’s playing fast and loose with freedom of information, says Chris Ames. Heathrow campaigners are finding it impossible to get a straight answer from the Department for Transport (more…)

Iraq minutes release vetoed

February 24th, 2009

Justice Secretary Jack Straw has vetoed the release of minutes of cabinet meetings in the lead-up to the Iraq war. The Information Commissioner had previously ruled that the records should be released. Read more here