<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Index on Censorship &#187; Jacob Zuma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/tag/jacob-zuma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org</link>
	<description>for free expression</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:22:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/4.0.8" -->
	<itunes:summary>for free expression</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Index on Censorship</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>for free expression</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>South African parliament passes ‘secrecy bill’</title>
		<link>http://uncut.indexoncensorship.org/2013/04/south-african-parliament-passes-secrecy-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://uncut.indexoncensorship.org/2013/04/south-african-parliament-passes-secrecy-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sara Yasin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newswire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right2Know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secrecy Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacob Zuma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nadine Gordimer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics and society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncut.indexoncensorship.org/?p=9749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>South Africa&#8217;s parliament yesterday approved a controversial bill aimed at protecting state secrets. Dubbed the &#8220;secrecy bill&#8221; by its critics, the Protection of State Information bill was passed by 189 votes to 74. Campaigners against the bill&#160;warned of the &#8220;chilling effect&#8221; it could create for anyone fighting to bring government corruption to light. The Right2Know campaign has been working against the bill since its introduction in 2010, and has&#160;vowed to continue fighting against the bill, which now must be signed by Jacob Zuma, South Africa&#8217;s president, in order to go into effect. Although the bill was amended last year to include a clause on public interest, the campaign says that the modified bill still &#8220;only has narrow protection for whistleblowers [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://uncut.indexoncensorship.org/2013/04/south-african-parliament-passes-secrecy-bill/">South African parliament passes ‘secrecy bill’</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>South Africa&#8217;s parliament yesterday approved a controversial bill aimed at protecting state secrets. Dubbed the &#8220;secrecy bill&#8221; by its critics, the Protection of State Information bill was passed by 189 votes to 74. Campaigners <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/apr/25/south-african-activists-secrecy-bill" >against the bill</a> warned of the &#8220;chilling effect&#8221; it could create for anyone fighting to bring government corruption to light.</p>
<p>The Right2Know campaign has been working against the bill since its introduction in 2010, and has <a title="Right2Know: official website" href="http://www.r2k.org.za/2013/04/25/secercy_bill_vote_protest/" >vowed</a> to continue fighting against the bill, which now must be signed by Jacob Zuma, South Africa&#8217;s president, in order to go into effect. Although the bill <a href="http://uncut.indexoncensorship.org/2012/11/south-africa-secrecy-bill-2/" >was amended last year</a> to include a clause on public interest, the campaign says that the modified bill still &#8220;only has narrow protection for whistleblowers and public advocates&#8221;. Right2Know also criticised the bill&#8217;s vague language &#8212; which they say could possibly endanger whistleblowers and journalists.</p>
<p>Writing for Index on Censorship last year, Nobel laureate Nadine Gordimer <a title="Index: Let the truth be told" href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/03/let-the-truth-be-told/" >said</a> that the bill &#8220;must be discarded in its entirety.&#8221;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2>More on this story:</h2>
<h2><a title="Index - Let the truth be told " href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/03/let-the-truth-be-told/" >Nadine Gordminer:</a> Let the truth be told</h2>
<h2><a title="Index - South Africa’s Secrecy Bill: A threat to press freedom or an awakening? " href="http://uncut.indexoncensorship.org/2012/09/south-africa-secrecy-bill/" >South Africa&#8217;s Secrecy Bill</a>: A threat to press freedom or an awakening?</h2>
<h2><a title="Index - Let the truth be told " href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/03/let-the-truth-be-told/" > </a></h2>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://uncut.indexoncensorship.org/2013/04/south-african-parliament-passes-secrecy-bill/">South African parliament passes ‘secrecy bill’</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uncut.indexoncensorship.org/2013/04/south-african-parliament-passes-secrecy-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Africa: &#8220;The Spear&#8221; gets age restriction</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/06/south-africa-the-spear-gets-age-restriction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/06/south-africa-the-spear-gets-age-restriction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 10:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alice Purkiss</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Index Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minipost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free expressin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacob Zuma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Spear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=37044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Controversial painting of South African President Jacob Zuma has been given an age restriction. The piece entitled &#8220;The Spear&#8221; which displays the president with his genitals exposed, has been given a 16N rating by The Film and Publication Board, meaning children under the age of 16 cannot view the work because it contains nudity. Anyone who [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/06/south-africa-the-spear-gets-age-restriction/">South Africa: &#8220;The Spear&#8221; gets age restriction</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Controversial painting of <a title="Index on Censorship: South Africa" href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/tag/South-Africa" target="_blank">South African</a> President Jacob Zuma has been given an <a title="I Africa: 'The Spear' gets age restriction" href="http://news.iafrica.com/sa/797894.html" target="_blank">age restriction</a>. The piece entitled &#8220;The Spear&#8221; which displays the president with his genitals exposed, has been given a 16N rating by The Film and Publication Board, meaning children under the age of 16 cannot view the work because it contains nudity. Anyone who wishes to reproduce the image will also be subject to the restriction. Earlier this week, City Press were <a title="Index on Censorship: SOUTH AFRICA: NEWSPAPER DROPS CONTROVERSIAL IMAGE OF PRESIDENT FROM WEBSITE" href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/05/south-africa-newspaper-drops-controversial-image-of-president-from-website/" target="_blank">forced to remove</a> an image of the painting from their website. Zuma has <a title="Index on Censorship: SOUTH AFRICA: JACOB ZUMA GOES TO COURT OVER PAINTING DEPICTING HIS GENITALS" href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/05/south-africa-jacob-zuma-goes-to-court-over-painting-depicting-his-genitals/" target="_blank">taken legal action</a> to have the painting removed from the Goodman Gallery in Johannesburg.<p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/06/south-africa-the-spear-gets-age-restriction/">South Africa: &#8220;The Spear&#8221; gets age restriction</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/06/south-africa-the-spear-gets-age-restriction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Africa: Newspaper drops controversial image of president from website</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/05/south-africa-newspaper-drops-controversial-image-of-president-from-website/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/05/south-africa-newspaper-drops-controversial-image-of-president-from-website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 15:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alice Purkiss</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Index Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minipost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacob Zuma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Spear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=36965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The website of a South African newspaper has been forced to remove an image of a controversial painting of President Jacob Zuma.  City Press newspaper were put under pressure from the ruling African National Congress (ANC) who called for the website to be boycotted until the “insulting portrait” was removed. The image, which shows the president with his [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/05/south-africa-newspaper-drops-controversial-image-of-president-from-website/">South Africa: Newspaper drops controversial image of president from website</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[The website of a <a title="Index on Censorship: South Africa" href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/tag/South-Africa" target="_blank">South African</a> newspaper has been <a title="IFEX: &quot;City Press&quot; newspaper drops controversial image of president from website" href="http://www.ifex.org/south_africa/2012/05/29/city_press/" target="_blank">forced to remove</a> an image of a controversial painting of President Jacob Zuma.  City Press newspaper were put under pressure from the ruling African National Congress (ANC) who called for the website to be boycotted until the “insulting portrait” was removed. The image, which shows the president with his genitals exposed and is entitled The Spear, appeared as part of a satirical art exhibition at a gallery in Johannesburg, and has caused massive controversy, leading to Zuma taking <a title="Index on Censorship: South Africa: Jacob Zuma goes to court over painting depicting genitals " href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/05/south-africa-jacob-zuma-goes-to-court-over-painting-depicting-his-genitals/" target="_blank">legal action</a> to have the portrait removed.<p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/05/south-africa-newspaper-drops-controversial-image-of-president-from-website/">South Africa: Newspaper drops controversial image of president from website</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/05/south-africa-newspaper-drops-controversial-image-of-president-from-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Africa: Jacob Zuma painting vandalised in gallery</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/05/south-africa-jacob-zuma-painting-vandalised-in-gallery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/05/south-africa-jacob-zuma-painting-vandalised-in-gallery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 14:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alice Purkiss</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Index Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minipost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacob Zuma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Spear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=36842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A controversial painting depicting South African president Jacob Zuma exposing his genitals has been vandalised at the Goodman Gallery in Johannesburg. The image, which has prompted Zuma to take legal action to have it removed from the gallery, has been covered in black and red paint. The painting &#8212; entitled The Spear &#8212; by provocative artist Brett Murray, [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/05/south-africa-jacob-zuma-painting-vandalised-in-gallery/">South Africa: Jacob Zuma painting vandalised in gallery</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[A controversial painting depicting <a title="Index on Censorship: South Africa" href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/tag/South-Africa" target="_blank">South African</a> president Jacob Zuma exposing his genitals has been <a title="BBC: Jacob Zuma painting vandalised in South Africa gallery" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-18159204" target="_blank">vandalised</a> at the Goodman Gallery in Johannesburg. The image, which has prompted Zuma to<a title="Index on Censorship: SOUTH AFRICA: JACOB ZUMA GOES TO COURT OVER PAINTING DEPICTING HIS GENITALS" href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/05/south-africa-jacob-zuma-goes-to-court-over-painting-depicting-his-genitals/" target="_blank"> take legal action</a> to have it removed from the gallery, has been covered in black and red paint. The painting &#8212; entitled The Spear &#8212; by provocative artist Brett Murray, has already been sold for $14,000 (£9,000). The vandals claimed the the painting is &#8220;disrespectful to President Zuma&#8221;.<p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/05/south-africa-jacob-zuma-painting-vandalised-in-gallery/">South Africa: Jacob Zuma painting vandalised in gallery</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/05/south-africa-jacob-zuma-painting-vandalised-in-gallery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Africa: Jacob Zuma goes to court over painting depicting his genitals</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/05/south-africa-jacob-zuma-goes-to-court-over-painting-depicting-his-genitals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/05/south-africa-jacob-zuma-goes-to-court-over-painting-depicting-his-genitals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 09:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alice Purkiss</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Index Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minipost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacob Zuma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=36674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>South Africa&#8217;s president is taking legal action after the showing of a painting displaying his genitals. Jacob Zuma is arguing that the painting of him by artist Brett Murray should be removed because it violates his right to dignity and makes a mockery of his office. The piece, entitled The Spear, is currently displayed in the  Goodman Gallery in [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/05/south-africa-jacob-zuma-goes-to-court-over-painting-depicting-his-genitals/">South Africa: Jacob Zuma goes to court over painting depicting his genitals</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a title="Index on Censorship - South Africa" href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/tag/South-Africa" target="_blank">South Africa&#8217;s</a> president is taking <a title="Guardian: Jacob Zuma goes to court over painting depicting his genitals" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/may/21/jacob-zuma-court-painting-genitals" target="_blank">legal action</a> after the showing of a painting displaying his genitals. Jacob Zuma is arguing that the painting of him by artist Brett Murray should be removed because it violates his right to dignity and makes a mockery of his office. The piece, entitled The Spear, is currently displayed in the  Goodman Gallery in Johannesburg. Zuma claims that the piece portrays him as &#8220;a philanderer, a womaniser and one with no respect&#8221;. The African National Congress (ANC) has said the piece presents a crude stereotype of African male sexuality.<p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/05/south-africa-jacob-zuma-goes-to-court-over-painting-depicting-his-genitals/">South Africa: Jacob Zuma goes to court over painting depicting his genitals</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/05/south-africa-jacob-zuma-goes-to-court-over-painting-depicting-his-genitals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Africa: Jacob Zuma sues newspaper over cartoon</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/12/south-africa-jacob-zuma-sues-newspaper-over-cartoon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/12/south-africa-jacob-zuma-sues-newspaper-over-cartoon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Intern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Index Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minipost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacob Zuma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sub-Saharan Africa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=18643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>South African president, Jacob Zuma has filed a $440,000 defamation lawsuit over a cartoon depicting him as a rapist of the justice system. The cartoon, published in 2008 by South Africa&#8217;s Sunday Times, depicts Zuma pulling his trousers down and about to rape a woman symbolising  the justice system, aided by allies.  One of Zuma&#8217;s [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/12/south-africa-jacob-zuma-sues-newspaper-over-cartoon/">South Africa: Jacob Zuma sues newspaper over cartoon</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Zuma-Cartoon.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-18649" title="Zuma-Cartoon" src="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Zuma-Cartoon.gif" alt="" width="300" height="180" /></a>South African president, <a title="Jacob Zuma" href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/tag/jacob-zuma/" target="_blank">Jacob Zuma</a> has filed a $440,000 defamation lawsuit over a cartoon depicting him as a <a title="Jacob Zuma sues South Africa newspaper over cartoon" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/14/jacob-zuma-sues-newspaper-cartoon" target="_blank">rapist of the justice system</a>. The cartoon, published in 2008 by South Africa&#8217;s Sunday Times, depicts Zuma pulling his trousers down and about to rape a woman symbolising  the justice system, aided by allies.  One of Zuma&#8217;s allies depicted in the cartoon, filed a complaint about the cartoon before South Africa&#8217;s Human Rights Commission in 2008, however the commission concluded that the cartoon did not violate Zuma&#8217;s constitutional right to dignity or constitute hate speech.<p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/12/south-africa-jacob-zuma-sues-newspaper-over-cartoon/">South Africa: Jacob Zuma sues newspaper over cartoon</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/12/south-africa-jacob-zuma-sues-newspaper-over-cartoon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ANC leader guilty of hate speech</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/03/anc-leader-guilty-of-hate-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/03/anc-leader-guilty-of-hate-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Intern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Index Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minipost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacob Zuma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sub-Saharan Africa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=9439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The leader of the youth wing of South Africa’s ruling African National Congress (ANC) has been found guilty of hate speech. Julius Malema has been ordered to apologise for remarks he made last year, which suggested that the women who accused President Jacob Zuma of rape had enjoyed the experience. The prominent South African politician [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/03/anc-leader-guilty-of-hate-speech/">ANC leader guilty of hate speech</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[The leader of the youth wing of South Africa’s ruling African National Congress (ANC) has been <a title="BBC: ANC's Julius Malema guilty of South Africa hate speech" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/8567727.stm" target="_blank">found guilty of hate speech</a>. Julius Malema has been ordered to apologise for remarks he made last year, which suggested that the women who accused President Jacob Zuma of rape had enjoyed the experience. The prominent South African politician was ordered by the Equality Court to pay 50,000 rand to a shelter for abused women. Zuma was <a title="Mail and Guardian Online: Zuma found not guilty" href="http://www.mg.co.za/article/2006-05-08-zuma-found-not-guilty" target="_blank">acquitted of rape in 2006</a> after he insisted that the sex with his accuser was consensual.<p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/03/anc-leader-guilty-of-hate-speech/">ANC leader guilty of hate speech</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/03/anc-leader-guilty-of-hate-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zuma accepts damages from Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/07/zuma-accepts-damages-from-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/07/zuma-accepts-damages-from-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Index on Censorship</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Index Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minipost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacob Zuma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sub-Saharan Africa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=4617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Guardian has published an apology and has settled out of court for an undisclosed amount with the South African President. The paper had described president Zuma in an article as a rapist. President Zuma, although brought to court for both rape and corruption was not convicted as guilty. Read more here</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/07/zuma-accepts-damages-from-guardian/">Zuma accepts damages from Guardian</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Guardian has published an apology and has settled out of court for an undisclosed amount with the South African President. The paper had described president Zuma in an article as a rapist. President Zuma, although brought to court for both rape and corruption was not convicted as guilty. Read more <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSTRE56T3GS20090730">here</a><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/07/zuma-accepts-damages-from-guardian/">Zuma accepts damages from Guardian</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/07/zuma-accepts-damages-from-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: www.indexoncensorship.org @ 2013-05-18 12:44:51 by W3 Total Cache --