<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Index on Censorship &#187; parliament square</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/tag/parliament-square/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org</link>
	<description>for free expression</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:22:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/4.0.8" -->
	<itunes:summary>for free expression</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Index on Censorship</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>for free expression</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>UK: Police move in on Parliament Square protesters</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/01/uk-police-move-in-on-parliament-square-protesters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/01/uk-police-move-in-on-parliament-square-protesters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alice Purkiss</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Index Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minipost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demonstration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament square]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police reform and social responsibility bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=32059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Police began to clear tents from London&#8217;s Parliament Square yesterday, after a new bill allowing for their removal went into effect this year. Metropolitan Police arrived at the camp at around 7.30pm on 16 December, and began to move on those campaigning on issues such as the war in Afghanistan. The police reform and social responsibility [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/01/uk-police-move-in-on-parliament-square-protesters/">UK: Police move in on Parliament Square protesters</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Police began to <a title="Guardian : Police move in on Parliament Square protesters" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/jan/16/parliament-square-protest-tents" target="_blank">clear tents</a> from <a title="Index on Censorship : UK" href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/tag/UK" target="_blank">London&#8217;s</a> Parliament Square yesterday, after a new bill allowing for their removal went into effect this year. Metropolitan Police arrived at the camp at around 7.30pm on 16 December, and began to move on those campaigning on issues such as the war in Afghanistan. The police reform and social responsibility <a title="parliament.uk: Police reform and social responsibility bill" href="http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2010-11/policereformandsocialresponsibility.html">bill</a>, outlaws the setting up in Parliament Square of &#8220;any tent, or any other structure that is designed, or adapted … for the purpose of facilitating sleeping or staying in.&#8221; Protesters set up camp in &#8220;Democracy Square&#8221; in May 2010.<p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/01/uk-police-move-in-on-parliament-square-protesters/">UK: Police move in on Parliament Square protesters</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/01/uk-police-move-in-on-parliament-square-protesters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democracy Village evicted from Parliament Square</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/democracy-village-evicted/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/democracy-village-evicted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Index on Censorship</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Index Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minipost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News and Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Haw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament square]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=14220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Protesters at London&#8217;s Democracy Village have lost their appeal against eviction from Parliament Square. Read Index&#8217;s report from the appeal hearing here</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/democracy-village-evicted/">Democracy Village evicted from Parliament Square</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Protesters at London&#8217;s Democracy Village have lost their appeal against eviction from Parliament Square. Read Index&#8217;s report from the appeal hearing <a href="http://blog.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/16/democracy-village-haw-appeal/">here</a><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/democracy-village-evicted/">Democracy Village evicted from Parliament Square</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/democracy-village-evicted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defining bona fide protest</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/defining-bona-fide-protest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/defining-bona-fide-protest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emily Butselaar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jo Glanville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament square]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=13784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jo Glanville</strong> responds: Narrow definitions of a bona fide protester smack of Victorian ideals of the deserving poor --- Index defends everyone's right to protest<br />
<br /><a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/protest-parliament-square"><strong>Brett Lock</strong> on the white noise of protest</a></p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/defining-bona-fide-protest/">Defining bona fide protest</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-5386" title="Jo Glanville 2-thumb" src="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Jo-Glanville-2-thumb-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="140" height="140" />Narrow definitions of a bona fide <a href="../tag/protest">protester</a> smack of Victorian ideals of the deserving poor &#8212; Index defends everyone&#8217;s right to protest</strong><strong>, writes</strong><strong> Jo Glanville</strong></p>
	<p><a title="Index on Censorship: Brett Lock: The white noise of protest" href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/protest-parliament-square" target="_blank">Brett Lock’s despair</a> at Index’s lack of sophistication raises of one of the great ironies for free speech activists. Many of the landmark free speech cases have been fought in defence of individuals whose ideas, beliefs and attitudes are singularly unattractive. Take the famous Skokie case of the 1970s, when the American Civil Liberties Union fought for the right of neo-Nazis to march through a Jewish neighbourhood. Or the celebrated Oz trial of the same decade. The Oz Schoolkids issue which was prosecuted for obscenity could never be called great literature, but the ultimate success of the case was an important milestone in protecting the freedom of expression of all writers. It is the principle in these cases that matters and that needs defending.</p>
	<p>Brian Haw may have some questionable beliefs, but his longstanding presence in Parliament Square became a symbol of protest and of the defence to the right to protest under the last government. Would our critics prefer that Index choose only the most deserving cases? How does one decide who is or isn’t a bona fide protester, worthy of the support of a free speech organisation? Rather than pick and choose the apparently desirable causes and victims, it’s important for Index to be consistent and defend Haw and the Democracy Village. New Labour brought in a chilling number of laws that infringed the right to protest &#8212; including the freedom to demonstrate around parliament, and the use of stop and search counter-terrorism legislation &#8212; and the coalition government’s commitment to repeal the restrictions around Westminster is to be applauded. The removal of Brian Haw at the state opening of parliament was therefore a worrying moment so early in the life of the new government.</p>
	<p>As <a title="Index on Censorship: Bibi: Parliament Square protesters face eviction‎" href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/06/parliament-square-protesters-face-eviction" target="_blank">Bibi van der Zee pointed out</a> in her piece for Index last week, the British have a long tradition of pitching their tents in protest &#8212; from Heathrow to road bypasses &#8212; on public and private land. And what could be a better spot for making your voice heard than opposite parliament? The legal argument around this case pitches the protesters’ right to free expression against the public’s rights and freedoms to access Parliament Square. But it is surely not the worthiness of the protesters’ cause that should be the central issue here.</p>
	<p><em>Jo Glanville is editor of Index on Censorship and a member of the Ministry of Justice working party on libel reform</em>
</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/defining-bona-fide-protest/">Defining bona fide protest</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/defining-bona-fide-protest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: www.indexoncensorship.org @ 2013-05-18 10:35:21 by W3 Total Cache --