<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Index on Censorship &#187; piracy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/tag/piracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org</link>
	<description>for free expression</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:40:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/4.0.8" -->
	<itunes:summary>for free expression</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Index on Censorship</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>for free expression</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>UK: The Pirate Bay must be blocked by ISPs, court rules</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/04/uk-the-pirate-bay-must-be-blocked-by-isps-court-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/04/uk-the-pirate-bay-must-be-blocked-by-isps-court-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alice Purkiss</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Index Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minipost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Pirate Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website blocked]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=36023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The UK High Court has ruled that file-sharing website The Pirate Bay must be blocked by internet service providers. The Swedish site, which provides links to download free music and video, which critics claim are are mostly pirated, will be blocked by Sky, Everything Everywhere, TalkTalk, O2 and Virgin Media. BT requested &#8220;a few more weeks&#8221; to consider [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/04/uk-the-pirate-bay-must-be-blocked-by-isps-court-rules/">UK: The Pirate Bay must be blocked by ISPs, court rules</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[The <a title="Index on Censorship: UK" href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/tag/UK" target="_blank">UK</a> High Court has ruled that file-sharing website The Pirate Bay must be <a title="BBC: The Pirate Bay must be blocked by UK ISPs, court rules" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-17894176" target="_blank">blocked</a> by internet service providers. The Swedish site, which provides links to download free music and video, which critics claim are are mostly pirated, will be blocked by Sky, Everything Everywhere, TalkTalk, O2 and Virgin Media. BT requested &#8220;a few more weeks&#8221; to consider their position on blocking the site. The same group of ISP&#8217;s were asked by the British Phonographic Industry to voluntarily block access to the site in 2011, but they refused to do so, unless a court order was made.<p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/04/uk-the-pirate-bay-must-be-blocked-by-isps-court-rules/">UK: The Pirate Bay must be blocked by ISPs, court rules</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/04/uk-the-pirate-bay-must-be-blocked-by-isps-court-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK: BT and TalkTalk challenge Digital Economy Act</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/bt-judicial-review-digital-economy-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/bt-judicial-review-digital-economy-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Intern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Index Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minipost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Economy Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Service Providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=13916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Two of the United Kingdom&#8217;s largest internet service providers (ISPs) have requested a judicial review be launched into the Digital Economy Act. BT and TalkTalk claim that the act, designed to reduce internet piracy, contravenes European Union legislation. They say the act, which was rushed through parliament before the May general election, will force them to [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/bt-judicial-review-digital-economy-act/">UK: BT and TalkTalk challenge Digital Economy Act</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Two of the United Kingdom&#8217;s largest internet service providers (ISPs) have <a title="Metro: Digital Economy Act to be challenged by BT and TalkTalk" href="http://www.metro.co.uk/tech/834496-digital-economy-act-to-be-challenged-by-bt-and-talktalk" target="_blank">requested a judicial review</a> be launched into the <a title="Office of Public Sector Information: Digital Economy Act 2010" href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2010/ukpga_20100024_en_1" target="_blank">Digital Economy Act</a>. BT and TalkTalk claim that the act, designed to reduce internet piracy, contravenes European Union legislation. They say the act, which was <a title="The Times: The legislative farce of the Digital Economy Act" href="http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article7093203.ece" target="_blank">rushed through parliament</a> before the May general election, will force them to disconnect customer subscriptions on copyright grounds. BT and TalkTalk claim the regulations <a title="ThinkQ: Talk Talk and BT want Digital Economy Act review" href="http://www.thinq.co.uk/2010/7/8/talk-talk-and-bt-want-digital-economy-act-review/" target="_blank">infringe basic rights and freedoms</a> whilst financially disadvantaging larger ISPs because the legislation <a title="BBC: BT and TalkTalk challenge Digital Economy Act" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/10542400.stm" target="_blank">will not apply</a> to ISPs with less than 400,000 subscribers.<p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/bt-judicial-review-digital-economy-act/">UK: BT and TalkTalk challenge Digital Economy Act</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/bt-judicial-review-digital-economy-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sweden pulls plug on Pirate Bay</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/08/sweden-pulls-plug-on-pirate-bay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/08/sweden-pulls-plug-on-pirate-bay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Index on Censorship</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Index Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minipost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirate bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=5079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The file-sharing website The Pirate Bay is now offline following a ruling by a Swedish court that ordered its largest internet service provider, Black Internet, to cut their service to the filesharing site. The court threatened Black Internet with a 500,000 kronor (£43,188) fine for failure to comply to withdraw services until the ongoing case [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/08/sweden-pulls-plug-on-pirate-bay/">Sweden pulls plug on Pirate Bay</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The file-sharing website The Pirate Bay is now offline following a ruling by a Swedish court that ordered its largest internet service provider, Black Internet, to cut their service to the filesharing site. The court threatened Black Internet with a 500,000 kronor (£43,188) fine for failure to comply to withdraw services until the ongoing case between Pirate Bay and the entertainment industry is over. Read more <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/aug/25/file-sharing-p2p">here</a>
</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/08/sweden-pulls-plug-on-pirate-bay/">Sweden pulls plug on Pirate Bay</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/08/sweden-pulls-plug-on-pirate-bay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pirate Bay faces Hollywood lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/07/pirate-bay-faces-hollywood-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/07/pirate-bay-faces-hollywood-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Index on Censorship</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Index Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minipost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirate bay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=4540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Thirteen movie studios including Disney, Columbia Pictures and Universal Studios are suing to shut down The Pirate Bay saying that the site is continuing to infringe their copyrights. Peter Sunde, a co-founder of high-profile file-sharing website The Pirate Bay, says new legal action against the site is nothing more than &#8220;harassment&#8221;. Read more here</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/07/pirate-bay-faces-hollywood-lawsuit/">Pirate Bay faces Hollywood lawsuit</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Thirteen movie studios including Disney, Columbia Pictures and Universal Studios are suing to shut down The Pirate Bay saying that the site is continuing to infringe their copyrights. Peter Sunde, a co-founder of high-profile file-sharing website The Pirate Bay, says new legal action against the site is nothing more than &#8220;harassment&#8221;. Read more <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8173388.stm">here</a><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/07/pirate-bay-faces-hollywood-lawsuit/">Pirate Bay faces Hollywood lawsuit</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/07/pirate-bay-faces-hollywood-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>French reject internet piracy law</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/04/french-reject-internet-piracy-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/04/french-reject-internet-piracy-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Index on Censorship</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Index Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minipost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News and Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downloading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=2362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>French politicians have rejected a bill proposing that people caught downloading music illegally three times should be cut off from the Internet. Read more here</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/04/french-reject-internet-piracy-law/">French reject internet piracy law</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[French politicians have rejected a bill proposing that people caught downloading music illegally three times should be cut off from the Internet. Read more <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7992262.stm">here</a><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/04/french-reject-internet-piracy-law/">French reject internet piracy law</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/04/french-reject-internet-piracy-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: www.indexoncensorship.org @ 2013-05-18 23:17:29 by W3 Total Cache --