<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Index on Censorship &#187; SARFT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/tag/sarft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org</link>
	<description>for free expression</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:22:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/4.0.8" -->
	<itunes:summary>for free expression</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Index on Censorship</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>for free expression</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>China’s two main censorship bodies to merge</title>
		<link>http://uncut.indexoncensorship.org/2013/04/sarft-gapp-china-censorship/</link>
		<comments>http://uncut.indexoncensorship.org/2013/04/sarft-gapp-china-censorship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alice Xin Liu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alice Xin Liu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GAPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newswire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SARFT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncut.indexoncensorship.org/?p=9706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Chinese government&#8217;s two main bodies of censorship,&#160;SARFT (State Administration for Radio, Film, and Television) and GAPP (General Administration for Press and Publications), are to merge and become one super administration. Although some denied the reports, the merge was announced during the 2013 session of China&#8217;s parliament, with the motion passed in March. Zhang Jin, deputy editor at &#160;technology publisher Popular Science Press, told state news agency Xinhua: &#160; Over the last 30 years of the opening up and reform period, both GAPP and SARFT have developed tremendously, but with this development of industry and flourishing of culture, many new problems have risen, for example the lockdown of departments, and individual management by each media type of themselves, and approval [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://uncut.indexoncensorship.org/2013/04/sarft-gapp-china-censorship/">China’s two main censorship bodies to merge</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">The Chinese government&#8217;s two main bodies of censorship,<span style="font-size: 13px;"> SARFT (State Administration for Radio, Film, and Television) and GAPP (General Administration for Press and Publications), are to merge and become one super administration.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr">Although some denied the reports, the merge was announced during the 2013 session of China&#8217;s parliament, with the motion passed in March.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Zhang Jin, deputy editor at  technology publisher Popular Science Press, <a href="ttp://news.xinhuanet.com/2013-03/12/c_124445898.htm">told state news agency Xinhua</a>:  <a title="Xinhua" href="http://uncut.indexoncensorship.org/2013/04/sarft-gapp-china-censorship/h" ><br />
</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="ltr">Over the last 30 years of the opening up and reform period, both GAPP and SARFT have developed tremendously, but with this development of industry and flourishing of culture, many new problems have risen, for example the lockdown of departments, and individual management by each media type of themselves, and approval [for content] department by department.</p>
<p dir="ltr">GAPP and SARFT didn’t want, under any under circumstances, to deal with each other. GAPP only paid attention to newspapers and print media and not broadcast media, and SARFT doesn’t get the support of the print media, making the merging of industries difficult.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="ltr">The new body replacing SARFT and GAPP &#8212; unofficially translated as the General Administration of Press and Publication, Radio, Film and Television &#8212; will be responsible for regulating and overseeing print media, radio, film, television, as well as the internet. It will also handle rights and contents.</p>
<p dir="ltr">SARFT is the body that <a title="Index: Censors ensure China’s film fans are missing the big picture" href="http://blog.indexoncensorship.org/2013/02/07/censors-ensure-chinas-film-fans-are-missing-the-big-picture/" >censors films</a> &#8212; recently facing controversy for cutting science fiction film <a title="Cloud Atlas: Official trailer" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWnAqFyaQ5s" >Cloud Atlas</a> by 40 minutes. GAPP also came under fire earlier this year for <span style="font-size: 13px;">overseeing the </span><a style="font-size: 13px;" title="UNCUT: Southern Weekly censorship causes nationwide condemnation" href="http://uncut.indexoncensorship.org/2013/01/china-southern-weekly-censorship/" >censoring</a><span style="font-size: 13px;"> of newspaper Southern Weekly New Year’s editorial. The </span>Guangdong provincial propaganda chief rewrote the paper&#8217;s heading and editorial without consulting editorial staff, forcing the reform-orientated paper to run a piece toeing the official Party line.</p>
<p>While both SARFT and GAPP monitored the internet, the specifics of their responsibilities were never clear &#8212; but now new and uniform regulations have been revealed.</p>
<p>The China Press and Publishing Journal <a title="Sina" href="http://news.sina.com.cn/m/2013-04-16/144326843150.shtml" >reported</a> that there will be three new rules for internet use under the new body: <span style="font-size: 13px;">use of news reports from abroad on websites will be forbidden without permission; editorial staff must not use the Internet for illegal content; and the microblog accounts of news media must be supervised, and an account holder appointed.</span></p>
<p>Whether the merge will create or lessen the chaos surrounding content control still remains to be seen.</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://uncut.indexoncensorship.org/2013/04/sarft-gapp-china-censorship/">China’s two main censorship bodies to merge</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uncut.indexoncensorship.org/2013/04/sarft-gapp-china-censorship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China: Dating shows face tough censorship</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2011/10/china-dating-shows-face-tough-censorship/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2011/10/china-dating-shows-face-tough-censorship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 11:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alice Purkiss</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Index Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minipost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dating shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SARFT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=27642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Increasingly strict media regulations are being applied to dating shows in China. Shows such as &#8220;If you are the one,&#8221; which have been highly successful in the country, are being subjected to regulations from the State Administration of Radio Film and Television (SARFT). The administration has recently banned &#8221;fake participants&#8221; who seek publicity, &#8220;morally provocative&#8221; hosts, [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2011/10/china-dating-shows-face-tough-censorship/">China: Dating shows face tough censorship</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Increasingly <a title="NTDTV - Dating Shows in China Face Tough Censorship" href="http://english.ntdtv.com/ntdtv_en/arts_entertainment/2011-10-06/dating-shows-in-china-face-tough-censorship.html" target="_blank">strict media regulations</a> are being applied to dating shows in <a title="Index on Censorship - China" href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/tag/China" target="_blank">China</a>. Shows such as &#8220;<a title="China Buzz - If you are the one" href="http://www.chinabuzz.net/tag/if-you-are-the-one/" target="_blank">If you are the one</a>,&#8221; which have been highly successful in the country, are being subjected to regulations from the State Administration of Radio Film and Television (<a title="SARFT" href="http://www.sarft.gov.cn/" target="_blank">SARFT</a>). The administration has recently banned &#8221;fake participants&#8221; who seek publicity, &#8220;morally provocative&#8221; hosts, and sexual references in all entertainment shows. Some fans have said that the new restrictions have made the shows less entertaining.<p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2011/10/china-dating-shows-face-tough-censorship/">China: Dating shows face tough censorship</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2011/10/china-dating-shows-face-tough-censorship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: www.indexoncensorship.org @ 2013-05-18 05:45:23 by W3 Total Cache --