Are you passionate about freedom of expression? Do you want to write for an award-winning, internationally renowned magazine and website, which has published the works of Aung San Suu Kyi, Salman Rushdie and Arthur Miller? Then enter Index on Censorship’s student blogging competition!

The winning entry will be published in Index on Censorship magazine, a celebrated, agenda-setting international affairs publication. It will be posted on our popular and influential website, which attracts contributors and readers from around the world. Index is one of the leading international go-to sources for hard-hitting coverage of the biggest threats and challenges to freedom of expression today. This competition is a fantastic opportunity for any aspiring writer to reach a global, diverse and informed audience.

The winner will also be awarded £100, be invited to attend the launch party of our latest magazine in London, get to network with leading figures from international media and human rights organisations, and will receive a one-year subscription to Index on Censorship magazine.

To be in with a chance of winning, send your thoughts on the vital human right that guides our work across the world, from the UK to Brazil to Azerbaijan. Write a 500-word blog post on the following topic:

“What is the biggest challenge facing freedom of expression in the world today?

This can cover old-fashioned repression, threats to digital freedom, religious clampdown or barriers to access to freedom of expression, focusing on any region or country around the world.”

The competition is open to all first year undergraduate students in the UK, and the winning entry will be determined by a panel of distinguished judges including Index Chair Jonathan Dimbleby. To enter, submit your blog post to competiton@indexoncensorship.org by 31 May 2013.

The post Index on Censorship Student Blogging Competition appeared first on Index on Censorship.

Has the media lost interest because, a week after the arrests, the British police have failed to find any incriminating evidence? Until some substantive progress is made, it would be difficult to get the newspapers and television channels to take it up in a big way. They feel there are so many other grave issues of life and death to address on a priority basis that the fate of the suspected students is not a matter to create an uproar. Besides, journalists who are by and large mindful of the wave of anti-American popular sentiments in Pakistan –– thanks to Guantanamo and Iraq –– are more objective in their reporting on terrorism where Britain is concerned.

In the sparse coverage blame was equally apportioned on the two sides. There is acute public awareness in Pakistan of the dangers  terrorists pose to human life. With suicide attacks taking place in the country practically on a daily basis and people being killed by the dozen it is also natural that terrorists do not have the sympathy of Pakistanis. Therefore the news of the arrest of the students in the UK was not something earthshaking. Globalisation has blurred boundaries, as is becoming increasingly clear after 9/11.

Media coverage also brought up the element of doubt that inevitably dogs such situations, especially now that there is talk of deporting the students because the police feel they may not be able to make a convincing case before a court of law. Why was consular access to the detained people denied to the Pakistan High Commission in London? Why was the Pakistan government’s previous offer of assistance with the background checks required in the visa process not accepted? Some reports of families proclaiming the innocence of their sons also made people think. But they were too few to stir anyone.

In the English language media, which addresses such issues seriously and has a better tradition of in-depth background investigation, there was absolutely no surprise. With the US having clamped down on student visas after 9/11, Britain has become a popular destination for students in pursuit of higher studies. But the regrettable part is that all those applying are not genuine students. Many are youth insearch of greener pastures who do not see much of a future for themselves in Pakistan. They spend nearly £20,000 on admission and first term fees, air tickets and initial boarding and lodging, then  find a job and drop out of college. Some use devious ways to remain on student visas.

Last year the UK issued 9,300 student visas to Pakistanis out of a total of 400,000 — quite an unbelievable figure given the state of education in Pakistan. One journalist who has been following the turn of events attributed this to the ‘crass commercialisation of education in UK and lax monitoring of dubious paper colleges and non-existent universities whose only concern is the money they charge as fees’.

Although there have been complaints about these fake institutions for long, it is only now that the British government has acted. When asked to register with the Border Agency for licenses to admit foreign students, the applications of 460 of 2100 institutions were turned down last month.

These bogus colleges have become a part of the immigration scam. So far the government had turned a blind eye to it as foreign students were injecting billions of pounds into the British economy every year. The flip side of a liberal student visa policy has now dawned on the British government. The alarm may prove to be a false one and a case of over-reaction by the police and the intelligence but the days of easy admission to British universities and easy visa processing are long past.

There might be embarrassment in store for the government after failing to find evidence or bring charges against those involved. But it seems the arrested students will be deported anyway. All this means is that it is becoming increasingly difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff.

The post Pakistan: reporting the student ‘terror trail’ appeared first on Index on Censorship.