<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Index on Censorship &#187; veil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/tag/veil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org</link>
	<description>for free expression</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:40:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/4.0.8" -->
	<itunes:summary>for free expression</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Index on Censorship</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>for free expression</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>Bosnia considers face veil ban</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/08/bosnia-face-veil-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/08/bosnia-face-veil-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Intern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Index Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minipost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bosnia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[niqab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=15228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Bosnian Central Parliament is to discuss new legislation on 1 September that would ban the wearing of a face veil, or niqab. The new law would impose a 24-hour curfew on veiled women, and those violating the ban could be fined 50 euros. Muslim women held a protest outside the Central Parliament in Sarajevo after the proposal was made by [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/08/bosnia-face-veil-ban/">Bosnia considers face veil ban</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Bosnian Central Parliament is to discuss <a title="IHRC: Bosnian Parliament is to ban the face veil" href="http://www.ihrc.org.uk/activities/alerts/9437-action-alert-bosnia-bosnian-parliament-is-to-ban-the-face-veil" target="_blank">new legislation </a>on 1 September that would ban the wearing of a face veil, or niqab. The new law would impose a 24-hour curfew on veiled women, and those violating the ban could be fined 50 euros. Muslim women held a protest outside the Central Parliament in Sarajevo after the proposal was made by the Bosnian Serb Party of  Independent Social Democrats (SNSD). <a title="Index on Censorship: Burqa ban will not protect women" href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/07/burqa-france-islam-ban/" target="_blank">France</a> and <a title="Guardian: Syria bans niqab from universities" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jul/20/syria-bans-niqab-from-universities" target="_blank">Syria</a> have already banned the veil, and the <a title="BBC: Dutch Mps to decide on burqa ban" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4616664.stm" target="_blank">Netherlands</a> and <a title="Guardian: Belgium moves towards public ban on burka an niqab" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/31/belgium-public-ban-burqa-niqab" target="_blank">Belgium</a> are considering similar legislation.<p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/08/bosnia-face-veil-ban/">Bosnia considers face veil ban</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/08/bosnia-face-veil-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quebec to ban niqab</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/05/quebec-ban-niqab/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/05/quebec-ban-niqab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 15:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Intern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Index Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minipost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=12525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Quebec&#8217;s legislature has introduced a bill which could ban woman wearing the niqab face veil if they wish to access public services in the province. Public debate on the controversial Bill 94 has been suspended until August after more than 60 recommendations were received in the first three days of testimony. It is now unlikely [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/05/quebec-ban-niqab/">Quebec to ban niqab</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a title="Montreal Gazette: Multiculturalism policy is 'idiocy', Bill 94  hearing told  Read more:  http://www.montrealgazette.com/life/Multiculturalism+policy+idiocy+Bill+hearing+told/3054131/story.html#ixzz0orXC5LAh" href="http://www.montrealgazette.com/life/Multiculturalism+policy+idiocy+Bill+hearing+told/3054131/story.html">Quebec&#8217;s  legislature</a> has introduced a bill which could ban woman wearing the niqab face veil if they wish to access public services in the province. Public debate on the controversial Bill 94 has been <a title="Montreal Gazette: Multiculturalism policy is 'idiocy', Bill 94 hearing told  Read more: http://www.montrealgazette.com/life/Multiculturalism+policy+idiocy+Bill+hearing+told/3054131/story.html#ixzz0or6ej8cs" href="http://www.montrealgazette.com/life/Multiculturalism+policy+idiocy+Bill+hearing+told/3054131/story.html">suspended until August</a> after more than 60 recommendations were received in the first three days of testimony. It is now unlikely that the bill will be voted into law before the end of the current legislative session in June.<p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/05/quebec-ban-niqab/">Quebec to ban niqab</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/05/quebec-ban-niqab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mauritania: Veiled women banned from courtroom</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/05/mauritania-veiled-women-banned-from-courtroom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/05/mauritania-veiled-women-banned-from-courtroom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 15:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Intern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Index Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minipost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mauritania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=12363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Security forces in Mauritania have banned veiled women from entering a courtroom where a terrorism case is being heard. Veiled women were also prevented from visiting the 20 defendants, who are accused of killing four French tourists in 2007 and attacking the Israeli embassy in 2008.</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/05/mauritania-veiled-women-banned-from-courtroom/">Mauritania: Veiled women banned from courtroom</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Security forces in Mauritania have <a title="Afrique En Ligne - Women in veil banned from witnessing trial" href="http://www.afriquejet.com/news/africa-news/women-in-veil-banned-from-witnessing-terrorism-suspects%27-trial-in-mauritania-2010051849468.html">banned veiled women</a> from entering a courtroom where a terrorism case is being heard. Veiled women were also prevented from visiting the 20 defendants, who are accused of killing four French tourists in 2007 and attacking the Israeli embassy in 2008.<p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/05/mauritania-veiled-women-banned-from-courtroom/">Mauritania: Veiled women banned from courtroom</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/05/mauritania-veiled-women-banned-from-courtroom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The right to veil</title>
		<link>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/01/ukip-niqab-islam-hijab/</link>
		<comments>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/01/ukip-niqab-islam-hijab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emily Butselaar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News and Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indexoncensorship.org/?p=7229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Suggesting banning women from dressing how they please is deeply offensive says <strong>Jess McCabe</strong></p><p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/01/ukip-niqab-islam-hijab/">The right to veil</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><img src="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/veil.bmp" alt="veil" align="right"/><br />
<strong>Suggesting banning women from dressing how they please is deeply offensive says Jess McCabe</strong><br />
<span id="more-7229"></span><br />
Once again, the issue of veiling has resurfaced, this time after UKIP’s former party leader Nigel Farage called for Muslim women to be banned from covering their faces in public places and public buildings, <a title="blocked::http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/feedarticle/8903326" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/feedarticle/8903326" target="_blank">according to the Guardian</a>.</p>
	<p>No doubt enlivened by the proposals for similar bans in <a title="Guardian: Full veil not welcome in France, says Sarkozy" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jan/14/sarkozy-full-veil-ban">France</a> and Denmark (in the latter country, a recent study found that only the <a title="blocked::http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/only-three-women-in-denmark-wear-burqa-20100113-m51m.html" href="http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/only-three-women-in-denmark-wear-burqa-20100113-m51m.html">three women</a> wear the burqa, along with a handful of women who wear the niqab). Farage wants us to believe such a ban would be neither &#8220;radical nor ridiculous&#8221;. The Guardian reports that he wants to impose such a ban in the name of: &#8220;preventing extremists from imposing their culture &#8212; including Sharia law &#8212; on Britain&#8221;.</p>
	<p>When he talks about Muslim women who chose to wear the niqab (and other forms of veiling which involve covering their faces), as &#8220;imposing their culture&#8221; on Britain, we can learn a lot about where this illiberal and intolerant desire to <a title="blocked::http://muslimahmediawatch.org/2009/10/questioning-the-veil-questioning-the-questioner/" href="http://muslimahmediawatch.org/2009/10/questioning-the-veil-questioning-the-questioner/">uncover</a> Muslim women comes from.</p>
	<p>For Farage, the mere glimpse of a woman who chooses to veil in this way, and is therefore visibly &#8216;different&#8217; to his concept of what British culture constitutes, is a threat. But what’s the real threat to British culture? Muslim women choosing to veil –&#8211; or UKIP, who wish to make this sartorial and religious choice illegal in public places?</p>
	<p>Writing for the ever-so-sharp blog Muslimah Media Watch last year, <a title="blocked::http://muslimahmediawatch.org/2009/10/questioning-the-veil-questioning-the-questioner/" href="http://muslimahmediawatch.org/2009/10/questioning-the-veil-questioning-the-questioner/"> Alicia said</a>: </p>
	<blockquote><p>“It is all too easy to pounce on the weakest members of society (the women, the minorities, the Muslims) in an effort to reinforce the superiority of White European culture. To avoid appearing bigoted and xenophobic, this superiority is couched on enlightened values associated with the freedom of the individual.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
	<p>The fact that women covering their faces makes some people uncomfortable cannot, in a free, liberal society, be a justification for forcing them to conform to UKIP&#8217;s notions of what women should be wearing, or force them to choose between veiling and the right to enter public places and participate fully in society.</p>
	<p>Given that Farage literally wants to restrict already marginalised women from accessing public space, his misuse of the rhetoric of feminism and women&#8217;s rights is ironic at best. And, perhaps it is no surprise he&#8217;s confused over what would increase women&#8217;s rights and what would restrict them, if we look at <a title="blocked::http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2009/06/european_electi_1" href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2009/06/european_electi_1">UKIP’s record on gender issues</a>.</p>
	<p><em>Jess McCabe is the editor of <a href="http://www.thefword.org.uk">The F Word</a>.</em>
</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/01/ukip-niqab-islam-hijab/">The right to veil</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org">Index on Censorship</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/01/ukip-niqab-islam-hijab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: www.indexoncensorship.org @ 2013-05-19 00:49:15 by W3 Total Cache --