Iraq: Did Butler pull punches?
December 7th, 2009

Chris Ames says the Chilcot Inquiry is highlighting flaws of previous Iraq war investigations
(more…)
Tags: Tags: Chilcot, Iraq, Tony Blair, wmd,
December 7th, 2009

Chris Ames says the Chilcot Inquiry is highlighting flaws of previous Iraq war investigations
(more…)
Tags: Tags: Chilcot, Iraq, Tony Blair, wmd,
April 8th, 2009
Why is British government trying to censor documents relating to the Iraq war it has already published, asks Chris Ames
(more…)
Tags: Tags: Chris Ames, freedom of information, Iraq, Jack Straw, wmd,
March 25th, 2009

Newly released documents reveal the very real need for an Iraq inquiry, says
Chris Ames
(more…)
Tags: Tags: Chris Ames, inquiry, Iraq, wmd,
February 24th, 2009
Justice Secretary Jack Straw has vetoed the release of minutes of cabinet meetings in the lead-up to the Iraq war. The Information Commissioner had previously ruled that the records should be released. Read more hereTags: Tags: Iraq, Jack Straw, wmd,
February 26th, 2008
The Information Commissioner, Richard Thomas, has ruled that minutes of cabinet meetings in the days leading up to the Iraq war should be released. (more…)February 20th, 2008
The release of a draft of the British government’s dossier on Iraqi weapons confirms suspicions but also raises more questions, writes Chris Ames
Monday’s release of the John Williams draft of the Iraq “weapons of mass destruction” dossier shows why the government fought for so long to suppress it. It proves what I have always suspected: that a spin doctor was in the thick of sexing up the document that took Britain to war. At the same time, Williams himself has shattered the Foreign Office case for not releasing the draft under the Freedom of Information Act.
We learn two things from the document. Firstly, Williams produced what became the dossier’s executive summary, which purported to set out the Joint Intelligence Committee’s (JIC) “judgments”. Secondly, and consequently, the draft is proved to have led to JIC chairman John Scarlett’s “first draft” the next day and therefore to the published dossier. The first shows that the government misled parliament in making the case for war. The second shows that the government misled the Hutton and Butler inquiries, and parliament again, to cover this up.
Tags: Tags: Chris Ames, Iraq, wmd,
February 18th, 2008
The 2002 draft of the British government’s dossier on Saddam Hussein’s weapons capabilities has been released by the Foreign Office. The government had initially tried to keep the document confidential, but the Information Commissioner ruled that it had to comply with the Freedom of Information Act request of campaigner Chris Ames.
Read Chris Ames’s article “Unfinished Business” here
Tags: Tags: Chris Ames, Iraq, wmd,
January 23rd, 2008
![]()
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office has lost an appeal to prevent the release of a document that formed part of the government’s case for invading Iraq.
The document was written by John Williams, then Head of News at the Foreign Office. It formed part of the drafting process of the dossier ‘Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction’, which asserted that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction which could be deployed within 45 minutes. The dossier, published in 2002, was central to the government’s argument for invading Iraq. The furore which followed BBC journalist Andrew Gilligan’s claim that the document was ‘sexed up’ led to the resignation of the director-general Greg Dyke and chairman Gavyn Davies after the publication of the Hutton Report.
The government had claimed that the dossier was the work of the Joint Intelligence Committee, but the draft is evidence that government spin doctors had a hand in the process.
Tags: Tags: Chris Ames, dossier, foreign office, Iraq, wmd,