{"id":10877,"date":"2010-04-15T08:43:20","date_gmt":"2010-04-15T08:43:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/?p=10877"},"modified":"2017-01-09T14:33:28","modified_gmt":"2017-01-09T14:33:28","slug":"chiropractoc-simon-singh-bca","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/?p=10877","title":{"rendered":"Simon Singh wins libel case"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/2010\/02\/simon-singh-chiropractic-bca-libel-appeal\/singh-3\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-8454\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-8454\" title=\"Simon Singh\" src=\"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/02\/singh1-140x140.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"140\" height=\"140\" \/><\/a>Simon Singh wins! The British Chiropractic Association(BCA) has today served a <a title=\"Ely Place\" href=\"http:\/\/www.elyplace.com\/index.aspx?p=1&amp;articleId=208\" target=\"_blank\">Notice of Discontinuance<\/a> bringing to an end its libel claim against Dr Simon Singh. The science writer was accused of libel for an article in which he cast doubt on chiropractors&#8217; claims of success in treatment of childhood conditions including colic, ear infections, asthma.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier this month <a title=\"Index: Simon Singh wins crucial ruling\" href=\"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/2010\/04\/simon-singh-bca-libel-ruling\/\" target=\"_blank\">Simon Singh scored a crucial victory<\/a> in his libel defence against the British Chiropractic Association. In <a href=\"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/Singh_judgement_01Apr10.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">a judgment<\/a> handed down by the court of appeal, the Lord Chief Justice ruled that Singh\u2019s contention that the BCA promoted \u201cbogus\u201d treatments was \u201ca statement of opinion, and one backed by reasons\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>The judgment allowed Singh to pursue a defence of \u201cfair comment&#8221;, the ruling could have a defining effect on the entire concept of &#8220;fair comment&#8221; in English libel law.<\/p>\n<p>Update: Read the BCA&#8217;s statement <a href=\"http:\/\/www.chiropractic-uk.co.uk\/gfx\/uploads\/textbox\/Singh\/BCA%20Statement%2015th%20April%202010.pdf\">here<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/2010\/04\/parties-back-libel-reform\"><strong>PLUS: A good week for libel reform<\/strong><\/a><strong>.<\/strong> All the major political parties now back change \u2014 and the campaign celebrates 50,000 signatures in support of libel reform<\/p>\n<p><strong>From the Index on Censorship archives:<\/strong> Floyd Abrams&#8217;s on libel <a title=\"The Big Chill: Through the looking glass\" href=\"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/2009\/06\/through-the-looking-glass\/\">Through the looking-glass<\/a><\/p>\n<h2><strong>Timeline<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><strong>2008 April<\/strong> Singh publishes an article about chiropractic in the Guardian<\/p>\n<p><strong>2008 July<\/strong> The British Chiropractic Association (BCA) sues Singh personally for libel<\/p>\n<p><strong>2009 May<\/strong> High Court gives a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/2009\/05\/eady-rules-against-singh-in-chiropractic-defamation-case\/#more-2531\" target=\"_blank\">negative ruling<\/a> on the meaning of Singh&#8217;s article<\/p>\n<p><strong>2009 June<\/strong> Singh asks for permission to appeal the ruling on meaning (paper application)<\/p>\n<p><strong>2009 July<\/strong> Mr Justice Eady <a href=\"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/2009\/07\/simon-singh-refused-leave-to-appeal\/\" target=\"_blank\">rejects<\/a> the application to appeal<\/p>\n<p><strong>2009 August<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/2009\/08\/simon-singh-to-attend-oral-hearing\/\" target=\"_blank\">Oral hearing<\/a> on leave to appeal<\/p>\n<p><strong>2009 October<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/2009\/10\/simon-singh-wins-leave-to-appeal-in-bca-libel-case\/\" target=\"_blank\">Leave to appeal granted<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>2010 February<\/strong> Lord Chief Justice says he is<a href=\"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/2010\/02\/simon-singh-chiropractic-bca-libel-appeal\/\" target=\"_blank\"> &#8220;baffled&#8221; by case<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>2010 April 1<\/strong> <a title=\"Index: Simon Singh wins ruling\" href=\"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/2010\/04\/simon-singh-bca-libel-ruling\/\">Decision on meaning<\/a> of original Singh article<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Emily Butselaar:<\/strong> British Chiropractic Association v Singh &#8211; BCA admits defeat<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/2010\/04\/parties-back-libel-reform\">PLUS: A good week for libel reform<\/a><\/strong> All the major political parties now back change \u2014 and the campaign celebrates 50,000 signatures in support of libel reform<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":30,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[581,21],"tags":[593,2034,165,1500,1119,595],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10877"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/30"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10877"}],"version-history":[{"count":53,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10877\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":83923,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10877\/revisions\/83923"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10877"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=10877"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=10877"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}