{"id":22110,"date":"2011-04-07T15:17:56","date_gmt":"2011-04-07T14:17:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/?p=22110"},"modified":"2011-04-07T15:22:28","modified_gmt":"2011-04-07T14:22:28","slug":"vietnam-brothers-face-jail-for-falun-gong-pirate-radio","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/?p=22110","title":{"rendered":"Vietnam: Brothers face jail for Falun Gong pirate radio"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Two Vietnamese Falun Gong practitioners are to face trial for transmitting programmes about their spiritual beliefs into China. The case of 30-year old Vu Duc and his 35-year old brother-in-law Le Van Thanh begins on Friday (9 April). If found guilty the pair face up to <a title=\"The Canadian Press: 2 Vietnamese Falun Gong practitioners to face trial after transmitting programs into China\" href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/hostednews\/canadianpress\/article\/ALeqM5jWerxVgiqqdBYh0aktCPy_ennLCw?docId=6479196\" target=\"_blank\">five years in jail<\/a>. China has banned Falun Gong, <a title=\"Charlottetown Guardian: 2 Vietnamese Falun Gong practitioners to face trial after transmitting programs into China\" href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.pe.ca\/Canada---World\/Society\/2011-04-06\/article-2404786\/2-Vietnamese-Falun-Gong-practitioners-to-face-trial-after-transmitting-programs-into-China\/1\" target=\"_blank\">they deem it a cult<\/a>, and practitioners are jailed.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Two Vietnamese Falun Gong practitioners are to face trial for transmitting programmes about their spiritual beliefs into China. The case of 30-year old Vu Duc and his 35-year old brother-in-law Le Van Thanh begins on Friday (9 April). If found guilty the pair face up to five years in jail. China has banned Falun Gong, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":31,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[584,585],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22110"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/31"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=22110"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22110\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22131,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22110\/revisions\/22131"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=22110"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=22110"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=22110"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}