{"id":27642,"date":"2011-10-07T12:54:19","date_gmt":"2011-10-07T11:54:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/?p=27642"},"modified":"2011-10-07T14:25:37","modified_gmt":"2011-10-07T13:25:37","slug":"china-dating-shows-face-tough-censorship","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/?p=27642","title":{"rendered":"China: Dating shows face tough censorship"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Increasingly <a title=\"NTDTV - Dating Shows in China Face Tough Censorship\" href=\"http:\/\/english.ntdtv.com\/ntdtv_en\/arts_entertainment\/2011-10-06\/dating-shows-in-china-face-tough-censorship.html\" target=\"_blank\">strict media regulations<\/a> are being applied to dating shows in <a title=\"Index on Censorship - China\" href=\"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/tag\/China\" target=\"_blank\">China<\/a>. Shows such as &#8220;<a title=\"China Buzz - If you are the one\" href=\"http:\/\/www.chinabuzz.net\/tag\/if-you-are-the-one\/\" target=\"_blank\">If you are the one<\/a>,&#8221; which have been highly successful in the country, are being subjected to regulations from the State Administration of Radio Film and Television (<a title=\"SARFT\" href=\"http:\/\/www.sarft.gov.cn\/\" target=\"_blank\">SARFT<\/a>). The administration has recently banned\u00a0&#8220;fake participants&#8221; who seek publicity, &#8220;morally provocative&#8221; hosts, and sexual references in all entertainment shows. Some fans have said that the new restrictions have made the shows less entertaining.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Increasingly strict media regulations are being applied to dating shows in China. Shows such as &#8220;If you are the one,&#8221; which have been highly successful in the country, are being subjected to regulations from the State Administration of Radio Film and Television (SARFT). The administration has recently banned\u00a0&#8220;fake participants&#8221; who seek publicity, &#8220;morally provocative&#8221; hosts, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":60,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[584,585],"tags":[103,7364,3882,3883],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27642"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/60"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=27642"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27642\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27654,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27642\/revisions\/27654"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=27642"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=27642"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=27642"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}