{"id":30788,"date":"2011-12-06T17:38:05","date_gmt":"2011-12-06T17:38:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/?p=30788"},"modified":"2011-12-06T17:38:05","modified_gmt":"2011-12-06T17:38:05","slug":"south-korea-review-of-social-media-boosted","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/?p=30788","title":{"rendered":"South Korea : Review of social media boosted"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Plans to intensify <a title=\"Index on Censorship - South Korea\" href=\"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/tag\/South-Korea\" target=\"_blank\">South Korea&#8217;s<\/a> review of\u00a0web content, including\u00a0social networking sites and\u00a0mobile phone applications <a title=\"CNN : South Korea boosts review of social media\" href=\"http:\/\/edition.cnn.com\/2011\/12\/02\/world\/asia\/south-korea-social-media\/index.html\" target=\"_blank\">have been released<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The review, which aims\u00a0to combat a surge in &#8220;illegal and harmful&#8221; information online, has\u00a0been underway since 2008, but the Korea Communications Standards\u00a0Commission&#8217;s latest plans to reshuffle departments will make way for a\u00a0review team that will oversee new media content.<\/p>\n<p>Social media users and civic groups believe the new plans constitute a clamp down on freedom of expression.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Plans to intensify South Korea&#8217;s review of\u00a0web content, including\u00a0social networking sites and\u00a0mobile phone applications have been released. The review, which aims\u00a0to combat a surge in &#8220;illegal and harmful&#8221; information online, has\u00a0been underway since 2008, but the Korea Communications Standards\u00a0Commission&#8217;s latest plans to reshuffle departments will make way for a\u00a0review team that will oversee new media [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":60,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[584,585],"tags":[346,4067,4066,7401],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30788"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/60"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=30788"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30788\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30810,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30788\/revisions\/30810"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=30788"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=30788"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=30788"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}