{"id":30984,"date":"2011-12-15T14:43:51","date_gmt":"2011-12-15T14:43:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/?p=30984"},"modified":"2011-12-15T14:43:51","modified_gmt":"2011-12-15T14:43:51","slug":"china-tighter-film-censorship-plans-in-place","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/?p=30984","title":{"rendered":"China: Tighter film censorship plans in place"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The <a title=\"Index on Censorship : China\" href=\"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/tag\/China\" target=\"_blank\">Chinese<\/a>\u00a0government is <a title=\"News : China plans tighter film censorship\" href=\"http:\/\/www.news.com.au\/breaking-news\/china-plans-tighter-film-censorship\/story-e6frfku0-1226223310379#ixzz1gagSaWSw\" target=\"_blank\">planning to tighten<\/a>\u00a0its\u00a0already strict film censorship rules. A proposal from the State Council, released on their website earlier today, is part of a draft law which proposes to ban anti-government sentiments and messages of religious fanaticism from the cinema screen. If passed, the bill, which comes during a box-office boom in China, will increase the number of <a title=\"Independent : Censors lay down the law in China\" href=\"http:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/news\/world\/asia\/censors-lay-down-the-law-in-china-796626.html\" target=\"_blank\">banned subjects<\/a> in Chinese cinema to 13. Another proposed ban could also prevent any film from &#8220;promoting&#8221;\u00a0illegal drugs or terrorist activity.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Chinese\u00a0government is planning to tighten\u00a0its\u00a0already strict film censorship rules. A proposal from the State Council, released on their website earlier today, is part of a draft law which proposes to ban anti-government sentiments and messages of religious fanaticism from the cinema screen. If passed, the bill, which comes during a box-office boom in China, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":60,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[584,585],"tags":[7364,442,968,571],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30984"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/60"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=30984"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30984\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30990,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30984\/revisions\/30990"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=30984"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=30984"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=30984"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}