{"id":31034,"date":"2011-12-16T15:06:47","date_gmt":"2011-12-16T15:06:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/?p=31034"},"modified":"2012-01-03T13:54:51","modified_gmt":"2012-01-03T13:54:51","slug":"china-gao-zhisheng-probatio","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/?p=31034","title":{"rendered":"China: Human rights lawyer Gao Zhisheng sent back to prison"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Chinese\u00a0<a title=\"Xinhua - Beijing court withdraws probation on ex-lawyer convicted of overthrowing state \" href=\"http:\/\/news.xinhuanet.com\/english\/china\/2011-12\/16\/c_131311157.htm\" target=\"_blank\">state media reported on Friday<\/a>\u00a0that human rights lawyer <a title=\"Index on Censorship - Gao Zhisheng\" href=\"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/tag\/gao-zhisheng\/\" target=\"_blank\">Gao Zhishen<\/a>g will be sent to prison for three years for violating his probation rules. In 2006 Gao was sentenced to three years&#8217; imprisonment for &#8220;subversion of state power&#8221;, being given\u00a0five years of probation. In 2009 he was taken from a relative&#8217;s home in Shaanxi province, northern <a title=\"Index on Censorship - China\" href=\"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/tag\/china\/\" target=\"_blank\">China<\/a>, resurfacing briefly in March 2010 and alleging he had been tortured. He disappeared again soon after.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Chinese\u00a0state media reported on Friday\u00a0that human rights lawyer Gao Zhisheng will be sent to prison for three years for violating his probation rules. In 2006 Gao was sentenced to three years&#8217; imprisonment for &#8220;subversion of state power&#8221;, being given\u00a0five years of probation. In 2009 he was taken from a relative&#8217;s home in Shaanxi province, northern [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":57,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[4061,584,585],"tags":[7364,1789,37],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31034"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/57"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=31034"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31034\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31595,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31034\/revisions\/31595"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=31034"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=31034"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=31034"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}