{"id":31358,"date":"2011-12-21T12:44:18","date_gmt":"2011-12-21T12:44:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/?p=31358"},"modified":"2011-12-21T12:44:18","modified_gmt":"2011-12-21T12:44:18","slug":"uk-nancy-dellolios-daily-mail-libel-action-struck-out","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/?p=31358","title":{"rendered":"UK: Nancy Dell&#8217;Olio&#8217;s Daily Mail libel action struck out"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Strictly Come Dancing star Nancy Dell&#8217;Olio has had her libel action against the Daily Mail <a title=\"Guardian : Nancy Dell'Olio's Daily Mail libel action struck out\" href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/media\/2011\/dec\/20\/nancy-dell-olio-libel-action\" target=\"_blank\">struck out<\/a>\u00a0by the high court. Dell&#8217;Olio attempted to sue the tabloid after an article, headlined &#8220;Return of the man-eater&#8221; appeared, referring to her relationship with 71-year-old theatre director Sir Trevor Nunn. The article, which was published in April, described Dell&#8217;Olio as\u00a0&#8220;a woman who hunts men but, rather than kill them and eat them, uses them for her own selfish ends&#8221;, which she believed presented her as a &#8220;predator&#8221;, and a &#8220;<a title=\"Telegraph : Nancy Dell\u2019Olio loses court action over &quot;man eater&quot; newspaper comments.\" href=\"http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/news\/uknews\/8969499\/Nancy-DellOlio-loses-court-action-over-man-eater-newspaper-comments..html\" target=\"_blank\">serial gold digger<\/a>&#8220;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Strictly Come Dancing star Nancy Dell&#8217;Olio has had her libel action against the Daily Mail struck out\u00a0by the high court. Dell&#8217;Olio attempted to sue the tabloid after an article, headlined &#8220;Return of the man-eater&#8221; appeared, referring to her relationship with 71-year-old theatre director Sir Trevor Nunn. The article, which was published in April, described Dell&#8217;Olio [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":60,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[584,585],"tags":[543,165,4119],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31358"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/60"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=31358"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31358\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31378,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31358\/revisions\/31378"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=31358"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=31358"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=31358"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}