{"id":32638,"date":"2012-02-02T16:48:05","date_gmt":"2012-02-02T16:48:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/?p=32638"},"modified":"2012-02-02T16:48:05","modified_gmt":"2012-02-02T16:48:05","slug":"south-korea-north-korea-twitter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/?p=32638","title":{"rendered":"South Korea: Photographer indicted over North Korea propaganda tweets"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>South Korean prosecutors <a title=\"New York Times - South Korean Indicted Over Twitter Posts From North\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2012\/02\/03\/world\/asia\/south-korean-indicted-for-twitter-posts-from-north-korea.html?_r=2&amp;smid=tw-nytimes&amp;seid=auto\" target=\"_blank\">indicted<\/a> a social media and free speech activist on Tuesday for reposting tweets from a North Korean government website. Photographer Park Jung-geun was detained last month on charges of violating South Korea\u2019s National Security Law, which broadly bans \u201cacts that benefit the enemy\u201d.\u00a0Park was interrogated by detectives following a police raid on his photo studio last autumn.\u00a0Park has said the tweets &#8212; which included reposting North Korean propaganda messages such as &#8220;long live Kim Jong-il!&#8221; and links to North Korean propaganda songs &#8212;\u00a0were intended to mock the North Korean regime.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>South Korean prosecutors indicted a social media and free speech activist on Tuesday for reposting tweets from a North Korean government website. Photographer Park Jung-geun was detained last month on charges of violating South Korea\u2019s National Security Law, which broadly bans \u201cacts that benefit the enemy\u201d.\u00a0Park was interrogated by detectives following a police raid on [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":57,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[4061,584,585],"tags":[571,545,4256,7401,700],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32638"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/57"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=32638"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32638\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32641,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32638\/revisions\/32641"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=32638"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=32638"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=32638"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}