{"id":32857,"date":"2012-02-14T11:11:59","date_gmt":"2012-02-14T11:11:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/?p=32857"},"modified":"2012-02-14T11:12:51","modified_gmt":"2012-02-14T11:12:51","slug":"china-dissident-zhu-yufu-jailed-subversion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/?p=32857","title":{"rendered":"China: Dissident Zhu Yufu jailed for seven years over poem"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Veteran\u00a0<a title=\"Index on Censorship : China\" href=\"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/tag\/China\" target=\"_blank\">Chinese<\/a> dissident Zhu Yufu has been sentenced <a title=\"Guardian : China jails dissident Zhu Yufu over poem sent on Skype\" href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/world\/2012\/feb\/10\/china-jails-dissident-zhu-yufu\" target=\"_blank\">to seven years<\/a> in prison for\u00a0&#8220;inciting subversion of state power&#8221; after he shared his poem<a title=\"Index on Censorship - Zhu Yufu charged with subversion for poem\" href=\"http:\/\/uncut.indexoncensorship.org\/2012\/01\/zhu-yufu-subversion-poetry-china\/\" target=\"_blank\"> &#8220;It&#8217;s time&#8221;<\/a> over Skype. The\u00a0court in Hangzhou, eastern\u00a0China, sentenced Zhu following\u00a0a trial hearing on 31 January. During the hearing, prosecutors cited the poem and messages the activist had sent online. In the poem, Yufu called on Chinese citizens to defend their freedoms. The court verdict said the crime deserved &#8220;severe&#8221; punishment.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Veteran\u00a0Chinese dissident Zhu Yufu has been sentenced to seven years in prison for\u00a0&#8220;inciting subversion of state power&#8221; after he shared his poem &#8220;It&#8217;s time&#8221; over Skype. The\u00a0court in Hangzhou, eastern\u00a0China, sentenced Zhu following\u00a0a trial hearing on 31 January. During the hearing, prosecutors cited the poem and messages the activist had sent online. In the poem, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":60,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[4061,584,585],"tags":[7364,319,346,64,4306,727,4291,1589,4197],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32857"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/60"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=32857"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32857\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32916,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32857\/revisions\/32916"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=32857"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=32857"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=32857"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}