{"id":33688,"date":"2012-03-06T11:19:52","date_gmt":"2012-03-06T11:19:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/?p=33688"},"modified":"2012-03-06T11:19:53","modified_gmt":"2012-03-06T11:19:53","slug":"china-online-editor-detained-for-reposting","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/?p=33688","title":{"rendered":"China: Online editor detained for reposting"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A web editor was <a title=\"CPJ: Online editor in China detained for reposting\" href=\"http:\/\/www.cpj.org\/2012\/03\/online-editor-in-china-detained-for-reposting.php\" target=\"_blank\">jailed for 10 days<\/a>\u00a0for reposting an unconfirmed report that two local officials had been caught with prostitutes in <a title=\"Index on Censorship: China\" href=\"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/tag\/China\" target=\"_blank\">China<\/a>.\u00a0Shang Laicheng, an editor at\u00a0Tiantian Xin\u00a0news forum was arrested on 17 February as he left work, and his family were informed he\u00a0had been formally detained for spreading misinformation.\u00a0The Foshan Procuratorate office said\u00a0that the information in the post, suggesting two local prosecutors were caught using\u00a0prostitutes at a sauna,\u00a0was fabricated and had damaged the reputations of authorities. The original author of the post remains unclear.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A web editor was jailed for 10 days\u00a0for reposting an unconfirmed report that two local officials had been caught with prostitutes in China.\u00a0Shang Laicheng, an editor at\u00a0Tiantian Xin\u00a0news forum was arrested on 17 February as he left work, and his family were informed he\u00a0had been formally detained for spreading misinformation.\u00a0The Foshan Procuratorate office said\u00a0that the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":60,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[4061,584,585],"tags":[7364,346,3114,727],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33688"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/60"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=33688"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33688\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33695,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33688\/revisions\/33695"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=33688"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=33688"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=33688"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}