{"id":400,"date":"2008-05-29T08:00:50","date_gmt":"2008-05-29T08:00:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/?p=400"},"modified":"2008-05-30T10:44:23","modified_gmt":"2008-05-30T10:44:23","slug":"see-her-for-what-she-was","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/?p=400","title":{"rendered":"See her for what she was"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href='http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/05\/whitehouse.jpg'><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/05\/whitehouse.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"whitehouse\" width=\"300\" height=\"180\" align=\"right\"\/><\/a><strong><br \/>\nMary Whitehouse was a shrill provocateur on a relentless crusade to stifle, oppress and scare, writes<br \/>\n<em>Padraig Reidy<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Mary Whitehouse has always been a peripheral idea in my life &#8212; one of those puppets on <em>Spitting Image<\/em> I never really recognised as a child, but laughed at anyway, because if I didn&#8217;t seem to be paying attention, my parents might revoke the &#8216;being allowed up late to watch <em>Spitting Image&#8217;<\/em> licence they had so generously granted.<\/p>\n<p>Later, in my smart-arsed adolescence, came the <em>Mary Whitehouse Experience<\/em>, the apotheosis of smart-arsed comedy. I don&#8217;t think I really knew where the name came from, save from the notion of some batty old woman.<\/p>\n<p>That batty old woman turned up again last night, in the BBC&#8217;s <em>Filth: The Mary Whitehouse Story<\/em>. Whitehouse herself was played by Julie Walters, which, to me at least, immediately makes her a sympathetic character: everyone likes Julie Walters, not least because she generally plays likeable people. The casting directors might claim they merely picked a great actor (and Walters is a great actor) but I can&#8217;t help being reminded of the casting of Brad Pitt as an IRA volunteer in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt0118972\/\"><em>The Devil&#8217;s Own<\/em><\/a>: back then, the producers furiously rebuffed notions that they were &#8220;glamorising&#8221; the IRA, but, being honest, the very fact of casting Pitt had to imply glamour. Pitt is intrinsically glamorous, and Walters is intrinsically likeable.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nThere does seem, at the BBC, to be a collective Gene Hunt Syndrome infecting all commissions dealing with the 60s and early 70s. DI Gene Hunt was, of course, the bad copper of the first series of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/lifeonmars\/\"><em>Life on Mars<\/em><\/a>, a bitter, thin-lipped bigot: by the time spin-off <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/drama\/ashestoashes\/\"><em>Ashes to Ashes<\/em><\/a> came round, Hunt had become a lovable, rough round the edges but essentially decent bloke. &#8216;Gloriously un-PC&#8217; as many had it.<\/p>\n<p>More worrying was the near-rehabilitation of Enoch Powell during the recent, disastrously arrogantly titled &#8216;White Season&#8217; (the entire thrust of which seemed to be to prove that white working class people are racists whose only concerns are immigration and Islam; the highlight of which was seeing the curious alliance of Bob Crow and John Gaunt berating the BBC on <em>Newsnight<\/em>).<\/p>\n<p>The BBC&#8217;s documentary on Powell and his &#8216;rivers of blood&#8217; speech (not a phrase he used, by the way) could not stop reminding us of what a brilliant man he was, implying that he had in fact, been prescient on future racial tensions (though what Powell was talking about was not &#8216;racial tensions&#8217;, it was proper, full-on race war of the kind now only normally discussed on the Stormfront message board).<\/p>\n<p>And so with Whitehouse, who, we now discover, was not a censorious, evangelical bigot (cut, as Nancy Banks Smith points out in today&#8217;s Guardian, from the same cloth as Margaret Thatcher) but a decent woman lost and confused in the licentious 60s. Balderdash and, indeed, piffle. Whitehouse was a shrill provocateur on a relentless crusade (or jihad, if you prefer) to stifle, oppress and scare: witness <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Whitehouse_v._Lemon\">her furious pursual<\/a> of Gay News&#8217;s Denis Lemon, who became the last man to be found guilty of blasphemous libel in this country after he published James Kirkup&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/torturebyroses.gydja.com\/tbrkirkup.html\"><em>The Love That Dares To Speak Its Name<\/em><\/a>: witness her outrage at Howard Brenton&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.litencyc.com\/php\/sworks.php?rec=true&#038;UID=13574\"><em>Romans In Britain<\/em><\/a>. These campaigns were not the work of a woman merely behind the times, or at odds with the more decadent aspects of the age, as the BBC&#8217;s drama had it: rather, they were the work of an unrepentant bigot. We should not imagine Whitehouse as any different, and we should guard against the re-emergence of her spirit.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mary Whitehouse was a shrill provocateur on a relentless crusade to stifle, oppress and scare, writes Padraig Reidy Mary Whitehouse has always been a peripheral idea in my life &#8212; one of those puppets on Spitting Image I never really recognised as a child, but laughed at anyway, because if I didn&#8217;t seem to be [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[4,21],"tags":[7358],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/400"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=400"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/400\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=400"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=400"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=400"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}