{"id":45375,"date":"2013-04-02T15:15:05","date_gmt":"2013-04-02T14:15:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/uncut.indexoncensorship.org\/?p=9483"},"modified":"2013-04-23T15:53:32","modified_gmt":"2013-04-23T14:53:32","slug":"prosecutors-crack-down-on-russian-ngos","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/?p=45375","title":{"rendered":"Prosecutors crack down on Russian NGOs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p dir=\"ltr\">Russian non-governmental organisations are facing a wave of state inspections, which some believe are taking place as \u00a0revenge for united protests against a law classifying international NGOs as \u201cforeign agents\u201d.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">The list of NGOs visited by prosecutors and other inspectors during last days, is impressive:\u00a0Transparency International, Amnesty International, Memorial, Moscow Helsinki Group, Human Rights Watch, Agora, For Human Rights (Za prava cheloveka), GOLOS, and numerous regional NGOs.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Even regional organisation Shield and Sword of Chuvashiya, which actually appealed to the Ministry of Justice seeking \u201cforeign agents\u201d status, has received a notification of an inspection.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">According to the law, an NGO that receives financing from abroad, has to register as \u201cforeign agent\u201d or face criminal charges. \u201cForeign agents\u201d are obliged to mark the literature and online content they produce as \u201cdistributed by foreign agent\u201d. The law stipulates that they have to report to inspection bodies far more often than organisations that do not receive financing from abroad. The frequency of \u201cforeign agents\u201d inspections is not limited by the law. Russian authorities have gained a legal tool for paralysing NGOs they don\u2019t like simply by swamping them with inspections.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Several human rights NGOs unanimously concluded the law doesn\u2019t comply with justice and the constitution and made a decision to boycott it by not registering as foreign agents.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Many of them came through planned inspections by the Ministry of Justice this winter \u2013 not as \u201cforeign agents\u201d, just as NGOs \u2013 to face extraordinary prosecutors\u2019, tax, sanitary and other authorities\u2019 inspections in March.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Russian veteran rights activist, head of \u201cFor Human Rights\u201d organization Lev Ponomarev refused to provide prosecutors with the organisation\u2019s documentation. He says, according to the law about, prosecutors had to provide him with information about violations of law by his organisation \u2013 such information being supposedly the only purpose for their sudden extraordinary inspections.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Prosecutors still haven\u2019t provided NGOs with this information.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">But the General prosecutor\u2019s office representative Marina Gridneva has said the prosecutors \u201cact in compliance with the law\u201d.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">President\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/2013\/03\/28\/us-russia-ngos-idUSBRE92R0MF20130328\">Vladimir Putin<\/a>, replying to Russian ombudsman Vladimir Lukin concerns over the inspections, said these \u201care routine measures linked to the desire of the law enforcement agencies to bring the activities of organisations in line with the law.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Political scientist Dmitry Oreshkin told Index on Censorship that the authorities aim to emphatically close one of Russian human rights NGO \u201cor make it hysterical\u201d in order to chill others.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">\u201cThe authorities think the problem will be solved, when someone shuts down in fear\u201d said Oreshkin. \u201cLev Ponomarev has survived the Soviet era fighting for human rights, he knows the law better than law enforcement bodies, and he is not likely to be the one to fulfill the authorities\u2019 expectations by fearing them.\u201d<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">The authorities, according to Oreshkin, are demonstrating incompetence and incapability.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">\u201cThe NGO boycott obviously enraged the Kremlin. Human rights activists, more than anyone else, now how crucially solidarity is.\u201d<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">The state\u2019s inconsistence, demonstrated during the ongoing NGOs inspections is based on a wrong perception of the word \u201claw\u201d, Oreshkin claims:<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">\u201cThe law concerns a citizen and an authority; the authorities have passed laws against citizens hoping they won\u2019t have to keep within the law themselves\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Russian non-governmental organisations are facing a wave of state inspections, which some believe are taking place as &nbsp;revenge for united protests against a law classifying international NGOs as &ldquo;foreign agents&rdquo;. The list of NGOs visited by prosecutors and other inspectors during last days, is impressive:&nbsp;Transparency International, Amnesty International, Memorial, Moscow Helsinki Group, Human Rights Watch, Agora, For Human Rights (Za prava cheloveka), GOLOS, and numerous regional NGOs. Even regional organisation Shield and Sword of Chuvashiya, which actually appealed to the Ministry of Justice seeking &ldquo;foreign agents&rdquo; status, has received a notification of an inspection. According to the law, an NGO that receives financing from abroad, has to register as &ldquo;foreign agent&rdquo; or face criminal charges. &ldquo;Foreign agents&rdquo; are obliged to [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":90,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[15],"tags":[13049,13724,1051,13048],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45375"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/90"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=45375"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45375\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":45750,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45375\/revisions\/45750"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=45375"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=45375"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=45375"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}