{"id":47193,"date":"2013-06-03T13:26:40","date_gmt":"2013-06-03T12:26:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/?p=47193"},"modified":"2017-07-21T17:16:55","modified_gmt":"2017-07-21T16:16:55","slug":"jordan-blocks-over-200-unlicensed-websites","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/?p=47193","title":{"rendered":"Jordan blocks over 200 ‘unlicensed’ websites"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Jordanian government began blocking over 200 websites on Sunday for failing to obtain licenses under a strict set of new guidelines, Ruth\u00a0Michaelson<\/strong>\u00a0reports.<\/p>\n

Four amendments to the country\u2019s press and publications law gave the government the power to censor sites that fail to comply, close outlet offices and hold the site owners responsible for posted comments. The changes to the law, which were introduced in 2012, sparked a backlash that saw 1,000 Jordanian sites stage a blackout on 29 Aug 2012. Undeterred, the government implemented the changes.<\/p>\n

According to press reports, 281 sites have so far been targeted. The pro-government Jordan Times quoted Fayez Shawabkeh of the Press and Publications Department (PPD) as saying that his department was responsible for compiling the list of \u201cunlicensed\u201d sites, which was forwarded to the Telecommunications Regulatory Commission (TRC). In turn, the TRC pressured the country\u2019s service providers to begin implementing the blocks.<\/p>\n

It became immediately clear on Sunday that the block included many sites that fall outside the category of what Jordan Times described as \u201clocal broadcasters\u201d. The website arabianbusiness.com reports<\/a> that \u201csome of the more prominent pages that have apparently been blocked by the government include Qatari news portal Al Jazeera, Time Out magazine, erotic publication Penthouse and the site of the Muslim Brotherhood in Jordan.”<\/p>\n

\"Al

Al Jazeera is among the sites being blocked in Jordan for failure to obtain a license.<\/p><\/div>\n

The amended press and publications law requires websites to obtain licenses similar to the rules that require printers to register, without regard to the differences between the mediums.<\/p>\n

A rundown of the law on the website tamimi.com<\/a> states that:\u00a0\u201cJordan\u2019s amendments to the press and publications law mean that owners of electronic publications, irrespective of where their offices are located, must take care when allowing their websites to be viewed in Jordan. While the amendments only contain four changes to the press and publications law, under the new legislative regime electronic publications that contain news, press reports, press releases and comments have an additional obligation to register, obtain a license and actively monitor the content of the publication in order to ensure that they are in compliance with the laws in Jordan.\u201d<\/p>\n

Therefore, the amendment is not simply regulating Jordanian sites, but any site available to view in Jordan- essentially requiring the entire Internet to comply with what appears to be a rather opaque and poorly defined category of regulations. In order to stay within the law, any site that wishes to be viewed in Jordan has to obtain a license and police the content of the site, irrespective of where it is in the world. The Jordanian government has \u201cstressed that the law is aimed to organize the sector and provide legal guarantees against slander and unlawful material\u201d according to AmmonNews<\/a>.\u00a0 Given the flexible and rather expansive language of law, there also appears to be few guarantees or safeguards that the government won\u2019t block a site arbitrarily or simply amend the law to block sites that it wishes to target.<\/p>\n

The stated framework of this law also raises questions as to whether sites like Al Jazeera, Penthouse, Time Out or the Muslim Brotherhood would ever be able to obtain licenses to be viewed in Jordan. Last year, the country\u2019s parliament considered a law that would have banned the Muslim Brotherhood from participating in the then upcoming election, on the basis of banning \u201creligious parties\u201d and Al Jazeera has sometimes been regarded as the fuel of anti-government protests across the Middle East. Penthouse would undoubtedly fall foul of public decency laws. It is unclear precisely what threat Time Out poses.<\/p>\n

It is also unclear at present whether the Jordanian authorities will continue to ignore to the intense pressure from press freedom and civil society groups such as the Jordanian Centre for Defending the Freedom of Journalists, who described the law as \u201cstorm[ing] the freedom of electronic media\u201d. Yet on the same day that the new law went into affect, King Abdullah launched his \u201cDemocratic Empowerment Programme\u201d, dubbed Demoqrati, which according to The Jordan Times \u201cis founded on development-boosting values such as the rule of the law, rejection of violence, acceptance of others, dialogue and accountability. It is also meant to stimulate civil society institutions to play their role as a key supporter of citizens and issues of concern to the public.\u201d It appears that the Kingdom is yet to regulate irony.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Jordanian government began blocking over 200 websites on Sunday for failing to obtain licenses under a strict set of new guidelines, Ruth\u00a0Michaelson<\/strong>\u00a0reports.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":103,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[4883,4060],"tags":[127,727,4673],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47193"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/103"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=47193"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47193\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":47794,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47193\/revisions\/47794"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=47193"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=47193"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=47193"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}