{"id":6418,"date":"2012-07-16T17:52:01","date_gmt":"2012-07-16T16:52:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/uncut.indexoncensorship.org\/?p=6418"},"modified":"2012-07-16T17:52:01","modified_gmt":"2012-07-16T16:52:01","slug":"russia-defamation-crime","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/?p=6418","title":{"rendered":"Duma criminalises defamation in attempt to silence opposition"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The pro-Putin United Russia party has re-criminalised\u00a0<a title=\"CPJ - Russian parliament votes to recriminalize defamation\" href=\"http:\/\/www.cpj.org\/2012\/07\/russian-parliament-votes-to-recriminalize-defamati.php\" target=\"_blank\">defamation<\/a>, just half a year since it was\u00a0<a title=\"Index on Censorship - Defamation decriminalised in Russia\" href=\"http:\/\/uncut.indexoncensorship.org\/2011\/11\/defamation-decriminalised-in-russia\/\" target=\"_blank\">decriminalised<\/a>\u00a0 on the initiative of ex-president Dmitry Medvedev.<\/p>\n<p>The move is in line with Russian government&#8217;s authoritarian response to a number of <a title=\"Index on Censorship - Protests, mass arrests and clashes with police mark Vladimir Putin\u2019s inauguration\" href=\"http:\/\/uncut.indexoncensorship.org\/2012\/05\/russia-putin-inauguration-protest\/\" target=\"_blank\">mass protests<\/a>. Since Vladimir Putin returned to the Kremlin, the State Duma has passed scandalous laws against <a title=\"Index on Censorship - Russian opposition activists questioned over anti-Putin rallies\" href=\"http:\/\/uncut.indexoncensorship.org\/2012\/06\/russian-opposition-activists-questioned-over-anti-putin-rallies\/\" target=\"_blank\">rally organisers<\/a>, NGOs which receive financial support from abroad and a\u00a0<a title=\"Index on Censorship - Russia prepares internet blacklist\" href=\"http:\/\/uncut.indexoncensorship.org\/2012\/07\/russia-internet-blacklist\/\" target=\"_blank\">blacklist of websites,<\/a>\u00a0which lets authorities shut down websites without the court&#8217;s decision.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Like the previous controversial laws, this one was passed by Duma very quickly. The amendments were introduced on 6 July and were passed in a third hearing on 13 July, right after president <a title=\"ITAR-TASS - Russian State Duma passes anti-defamation law \" href=\"http:\/\/www.itar-tass.com\/en\/c32\/472002.html\" target=\"_blank\">Putin<\/a> publicly supported the re-criminalisation of defamation. And just like before, street protests had no effect on the Duma&#8217;s United Russia majority.<\/p>\n<p>The new law stipulates a manifold increase of fines. An individuals will pay a fine of up to 5 million roubles (around \u00a3GBP\u00a0100,000) for defamation.<\/p>\n<p>The law adds a new article to the Criminal Code: libel and slander against a judge, prosecutor, investigator, assizer and bailiff. This will be punished by fines of up to 5 million roubles, or three years worth of the accused person\u2019s salary, or by forced labour for up to 480 hours.<\/p>\n<p>Human rights activists see it as an attempt to silence critics of Russia&#8217;s judicial system. Initiatives such as <a title=\"Index on Censorship - Sergei Magnitsky death highlights Russian impunity\" href=\"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/2011\/11\/sergei-magnitsky-death-highlights-russian-impunity\/\" target=\"_blank\">Sergei Magnitsky&#8217;s<\/a> blacklist of Russian authorities, allegedly responsible for his death, are a popular way to protest against corrupted judges and investigators. Activists create websites with dossiers on judges who conduct controversial cases, for example, against opposition leaders and entrepreneurs.<\/p>\n<p>journalist and rights activist Olga Romanova, an\u00a0expert on Russia&#8217;s judicial system, , told Index on Censorship the re-criminalisation of defamation &#8220;doesn&#8217;t really change the situation in the country: there are no unbiased courts left.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;They will use any article to shut you down in prison if they want to,&#8221; she said, adding that there is no point in stopping the creation of blacklists.<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"Index on Censorship - Defamation decriminalised in Russia \" href=\"http:\/\/uncut.indexoncensorship.org\/2011\/11\/defamation-decriminalised-in-russia\/\" target=\"_blank\">Defamation was decriminalised<\/a> last November before parliamentary elections. This was praised by human rights advocates, as during previous years defamation legislation had traditionally been\u00a0<a title=\"Index on Censorship - Russia: \u201cDefamation suits a key factor in suppressing free speech as long as Vladimir Putin rules the country\u201d\" href=\"http:\/\/uncut.indexoncensorship.org\/2011\/12\/russia-defamation-suppressing-free-speech-putin-russia\/\" target=\"_blank\">misused<\/a> against opposition activists and independent journalists.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;In November it was decriminalised not for us, but for the authorities themselves, so that they could shoot documentaries like NTV&#8217;s &#8216;Anatomy of Protest&#8217;,&#8221; Romanova said. The <a title=\"Index on Censorship - Opposition fury over NTV documentary\" href=\"http:\/\/uncut.indexoncensorship.org\/2012\/03\/ntv-russia-putin\/\" target=\"_blank\">film<\/a> claimed protesters against allegedly fraudulent parliamentary elections received money for participating in rallies, and caused a number of protests against NTV itself.<\/p>\n<p>So why is defamation back in the Criminal Code now? &#8220;While there&#8217;s no fair court in Russia, any judge can sue me for just stating that aloud,&#8221; Romanova says. &#8220;But they&#8217;d rather sue <a title=\"Index on Censorship - Russia cracks down on anti-Putin protests\" href=\"http:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/2011\/12\/russia-cracks-down-on-anti-putin-protests\/\" target=\"_blank\">Alexey Navalny<\/a>, or any other opposition leaders who are likely to run for president one day.&#8221; Russian law forbids anyone accused on criminal charges to run for any official post.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/photo.php?fbid=462683057084116&amp;set=a.368739553145134.90000.124964357522656&amp;type=1\" target=\"_blank\">Navalny<\/a> wrote on his Facebook page that he connects defamation recriminalisation with his new project,\u00a0<a title=\"BBC News - Russian activist Navalny targets Putin strongholds\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/world-europe-18820656\" target=\"_blank\">The Good Machine of Truth<\/a>: which aims to spread information about controversial United Russia activities.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The slogan that most annoys authorities &#8212; United Party is a party of crooks and thieves &#8212; is still legal, because slander and libel [<em>according to Russian law \u2013 Index<\/em>] is a crime against personality, not a corporate body,&#8221; he wrote, adding that his fellow opposition activists will carry on agitating against Putin.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The pro-Putin United Russia party has re-criminalised\u00a0defamation, just half a year since it was\u00a0decriminalised\u00a0 on the initiative of ex-president Dmitry Medvedev. The move is in line with Russian government&#8217;s authoritarian response to a number of mass protests. Since Vladimir Putin returned to the Kremlin, the State Duma has passed scandalous laws against rally organisers, NGOs [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":90,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[15],"tags":[13183,7936,241,5149,574,283,13048],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6418"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/90"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6418"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6418\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6418"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6418"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6418"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}