{"id":92293,"date":"2011-12-15T17:54:01","date_gmt":"2011-12-15T17:54:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/uncut.indexoncensorship.org\/?p=2886"},"modified":"2011-12-15T17:54:01","modified_gmt":"2011-12-15T17:54:01","slug":"thailand-political-activist-gets-15-years-jail-under-lese-majeste","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/?p=92293","title":{"rendered":"Thailand: Political activist gets 15 years jail under l\u00e8se-majest\u00e9"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Despite mounting public criticism on l\u00e8se-majest\u00e9, Thailand&#8217;s Criminal Court sentenced Red shirt activist Daranee Charncherngsilapakul, widely known as &#8220;Da Torpedo&#8221;, to 15 years in jail for three offences after rejecting her appeal. She was formerly convicted to 18 years in jail in a closed trial in August 2009, after spending more than a year in detention for making a fiery speech opposing the 2006 military coup and the monarchy in a public rally. <\/p>\n<p>According to a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bangkokpost.com\/breakingnews\/270923\/da-torpedo-sentenced-to-15-years\"> report<\/a> on 15 December, Daranee, said that she found it useless to fight the conviction, while her lawyer Prawais Praphanukul said he would discuss with her about applying for a royal pardon.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;There are two channels open, normal procedure by simply allowing the 30-day appeal limit to lapse, or a quicker way, by sending a document to the court indicating that the defendant abandons the right to appeal. After that, we will have to go through the proper channels for a royal pardon,&#8221; said Prawais. <\/p>\n<p>Since the court convicted the 61-years-old Amphon Tangnoppakhun to 20 years in jail on 23 November for four &#8220;l\u00e8se-majest\u00e9&#8221; sms messages sent from his phone, public criticism of the law and the judgement has been taking place in Facebook, the media and, on one occasion, on the street. Amphon&#8217;s age, and that the court ignored his pleading of not guilty and gave him the maximum sentence on the basis of him being the phone owner, caught public sympathy. A day before Daranee&#8217;s sentencing, the Court Spokesperson Sitthisak Wanachakij sent out to the media a defense of Amphon&#8217;s case judgement, stressing that channels for appeal are open to him. <\/p>\n<p>In the meantime, the Judge who sentenced Amphon, Chanathip Muanphawong, quashed Daranee&#8217;s appeal.<\/p>\n<p>The Yingluck administration, sworn to office in August, has not been supportive of calls to reform the l\u00e8se-majest\u00e9 law. As recently as 13 December, news website Prachatai reported that Deputy Prime Minister Chalerm Yubamrung asked the government for 400 million baht (8.2 million GBP) to procure a technology to crackdown on l\u00e8se-majest\u00e9 websites. He also received a petition by the Lawyers Council of Thailand, who urged the Information Ministry and the police to buck up in clamping down online l\u00e8se-majest\u00e9. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Despite mounting public criticism on l\u00e8se-majest\u00e9, Thailand&#8217;s Criminal Court sentenced Red shirt activist Daranee Charncherngsilapakul, widely known as &#8220;Da Torpedo&#8221;, to 15 years in jail for three offences after rejecting her appeal. She was formerly convicted to 18 years in jail in a closed trial in August 2009, after spending more than a year in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":464,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[4061],"tags":[3044,343,7377],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92293"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/464"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=92293"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92293\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=92293"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=92293"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=92293"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}