{"id":93469,"date":"2012-01-09T12:29:00","date_gmt":"2012-01-09T12:29:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.indexoncensorship.org\/?p=7259"},"modified":"2019-09-16T13:28:23","modified_gmt":"2019-09-16T12:28:23","slug":"kelvin-mackenzie-at-the-leveson-inquiry","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/?p=93469","title":{"rendered":"Kelvin MacKenzie at the Leveson Inquiry"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Former Sun editor\u00a0Kelvin MacKenzie told\u00a0the Leveson Inquiry that the paper would have come &#8220;very, very very close to being shut down&#8221; had it &#8220;got the Milly Dowler story wrong&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>MacKenzie, who edited the UK&#8217;s most popular daily paper from 1981-1994, was referring to reports in the Guardian that the News of the World had deleted voicemails on the abducted teenager&#8217;s phone, giving her family false hope that she was alive.<\/p>\n<p>The Guardian reported last month that, while the News of the World\u00a0had hacked into Dowler&#8217;s phone, it was unlikely that it was responsible for the deletion of messages that led to a false hope moment.<\/p>\n<p>Leveson LJ said MacKenzie&#8217;s view that the broadsheet got the story &#8220;completely wrong&#8221; was &#8220;interesting&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>MacKenzie\u00a0accused the newspaper world of &#8220;snobbery&#8221; and claimed\u00a0ethics depended on the paper in which an offending story was published. &#8220;If you publish in the Sun you get six months&#8217; jail, if you publish in the Guardian you get a Pulitzer.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>MacKenzie added that the culture of the Sun had changed after his departure, noting that subsequent editors Rebekah Brooks and Dominic Mohan were more &#8220;cautious&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>He admitted to adopting a &#8220;bullish&#8221; approach to journalism\u00a0during his editorship\u00a0particularly in the 1980s, adding later that\u00a0the\u00a0paper&#8217;s editor&#8217;s office was a &#8220;massive\u00a0hour-by-hour sprawl of phone calls and general rioting&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Pressed on fact checking by Leveson LJ, MacKenzie said there was &#8220;no absolute truth in any newspaper&#8221;, adding that\u00a0journalists attempting to get to the truth while being told lies was a\u00a0&#8220;massively\u00a0 difficult problem&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>He also\u00a0spoke in favour of newspapers being subject to heavy fines for lying to the Press Complaints Commission.<\/p>\n<p>Mackenzie admitted he did &#8220;not really&#8221; have much regard for privacy while editor.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, current editor of the paper&#8217;s Bizarre showbiz column, Gordon Smart, said ethics were a\u00a0balancing act between public interest and individual&#8217;s right to privacy. &#8220;There is a grey area there and we walk\u00a0that line every day,&#8221; Smart said, adding that he believed he and\u00a0his team &#8220;get it right more than we get it wrong&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>He said that the onset of Twitter meant showbiz reporters were more accountable than ever before, adding that social media added to the pressure to meet deadlines.<\/p>\n<p><em>Follow Index on Censorship\u2019s coverage of the Leveson Inquiry on Twitter \u2013 @<a title=\"Twitter : Index Leveson\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/#!\/indexleveson\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">IndexLeveson<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Marta Cooper<\/strong>: Kelvin MacKenzie at the Leveson Inquiry<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":57,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[3815,1],"tags":[14398,8906,1095,269,631],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93469"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/57"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=93469"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93469\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":109283,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93469\/revisions\/109283"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=93469"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=93469"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=93469"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}