Lord Justice Leveson has today made suggestions that a new model may need statutory backing in order to “give some authority to independent regulation”.<\/p>\n
The judge made the remarks while discussing today’s Times leader article defending a free press<\/a>\u00a0with the paper’s editor James Harding at the Leveson Inquiry<\/a>.<\/p>\n While in favour of a “sufficiently robust” system, Harding expressed concerns that a “‘Leveson act’ would give politicians the ability to loom over press coverage”, which he said would have a “chilling effect” on press freedom.<\/p>\n “I do not want journalists from The Times, years from now, walking into the offices of politicians and behaving in a certain way,” he added later, reiterating his fear of reporters submitting to political influence.<\/p>\n Leveson was blunt:\u00a0“Watch my lips”, he told Harding, adding that his mind was not yet made up. He said that the issue of regulation needed to be solved suitably by the press, adding, “it’s got to work for the public as well.”<\/p>\n Leveson also made it abundantly clear more than once today that he was not looking into mandatory prior notification.<\/p>\n Earlier in his testimony, Harding also said his proprietors\u00a0“never raised a finger” to stop the Murdoch-owned title covering the phone hacking scandal that engulfed the News of the World last summer.<\/p>\n When asked if The Times was\u00a0slow to cover the phone-hacking scandal\u00a0perhaps due to\u00a0external pressures, \u00a0Harding said that his paper followed up on the Guardian’s original story in summer 2009.<\/p>\n Following last summer’s revelations over the hacking of murdered teenager Milly Dowler’s phone, Harding said the Times featured the story “on the front page for about three weeks”, criticising the News of the World and News International.<\/p>\n Harding added: “Looking back I certainly wish we’d got on the story harder, earlier. The reality is that both the police and News International poured cold water on the story.”<\/p>\n