{"id":93490,"date":"2012-01-23T13:27:06","date_gmt":"2012-01-23T13:27:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.indexoncensorship.org\/?p=7514"},"modified":"2019-09-16T13:28:07","modified_gmt":"2019-09-16T12:28:07","slug":"bbc-mark-thompson-leveson","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/?p=93490","title":{"rendered":"BBC chief says statutory press regulation risks independence"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The director general of the BBC, Mark Thompson,\u00a0has said it is &#8220;unreasonable&#8221; to suggest other media organisations in the UK &#8220;can or could operate in the way the BBC does&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Testifying at the\u00a0<a title=\"Index on Censorship - Leveson Inquiry\" href=\"http:\/\/blog.indexoncensorship.org\/category\/leveson-inquiry-2\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Leveson Inquiry<\/a>\u00a0this morning, Thompson said it was\u00a0&#8220;important for the plurality of media in this country that the press is not constrained&#8221; in the same way as the BBC is, with with its public service requirements and statutory backing.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I think this country has benefited from having a range of media that are funded differently, constituted differently, have different objectives,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<p>He noted that the British public had &#8220;uniquely high&#8221; expectations of the broadcaster&#8217;s standards, and that the BBC was &#8220;committed to being most trustworthy source of news in the world&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>He added that statutory regulation of the press may risk newspapers&#8217; independence from the government.<\/p>\n<p>During his marathon 2 hour and 45 minute session, Thompson said the public service broadcaster used private investigators for surveillance and security purposes, rather than &#8220;primary journalistic inquiry&#8221;. In his <a title=\"Leveson Inquiry - Mark Thompson Witness Statement\" href=\"http:\/\/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/Witness-Statement-of-Mark-Thompson.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">witness statement<\/a>, Thompson wrote that PIs were used on 232 occasions by the BBC from January 2005 to July 2011, with one being hired in 2001\u00a0to track down &#8220;a known paedophile&#8221;. Thompson said there was a &#8220;strong public interest defence justification&#8221; for doing so.<\/p>\n<p>Thompson stressed that subterfuge, notably secret filming, would also on used by the BBC in the case of &#8220;very serious&#8221; public interest stories, adding that there would need to be &#8220;clear prima facie evidence&#8221; of any wrongdoing, as well as no other journalistic way of recording it.<\/p>\n<p>He cited the abuse at a care home exposed by investigation programme <a title=\"BBC - Panorama - Undercover Care: The Abuse Exposed\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/programmes\/b011pwt6\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Panorama<\/a> last year as an example.<\/p>\n<p><em>Follow Index on Censorship\u2019s coverage of the Leveson Inquiry on Twitter \u2013\u00a0<a title=\"Twitter - IndexLeveson\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/IndexLeveson\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">@IndexLeveson<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Marta Cooper<\/strong>: BBC chief says statutory press regulation risks independence<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":57,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[3815],"tags":[39,7427,14425,7358,2469],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93490"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/57"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=93490"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93490\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":109263,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93490\/revisions\/109263"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=93490"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=93490"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=93490"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}