{"id":93545,"date":"2012-03-14T13:15:19","date_gmt":"2012-03-14T13:15:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.indexoncensorship.org\/?p=8058"},"modified":"2019-09-16T13:27:39","modified_gmt":"2019-09-16T12:27:39","slug":"sandra-laville-leveson","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/?p=93545","title":{"rendered":"Crime reporters defend their links to police officers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Crime reporters have lamented the current atmosphere of more restricted contact between\u00a0the press and police\u00a0at the <a title=\"Index on Censorship - Leveson Inquiry\" href=\"http:\/\/blog.indexoncensorship.org\/category\/leveson-inquiry-2\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Leveson Inquiry<\/a> today.<\/p>\n<p>Testifying this morning, the Guardian&#8217;s Sandra Laville said that there has been an &#8220;over-reaction&#8221; by the Metropolitan police in response to the Inquiry into press standards, and that\u00a0&#8220;open lines of communication, which have been there for many years, are being closed down&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It affects everything I do at the moment,&#8221; she said. She told the Inquiry that when she recently approached a senior ranking officer to ask him about a subject he knew well, he said he had to ask the Met&#8217;s press officer who then refused her access to him. Laville said this was &#8220;absolutely not&#8221; how it was in the past.<\/p>\n<p>The reporter stressed that the country&#8217;s police force needed to be held account, which could not be done by journalists relying solely on official sources. She\u00a0warned that limiting information to official sources might drive information &#8220;underground&#8221; and turn it into a &#8220;black market&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I think we already have laws and guidelines in place and I think they should be reiterated,&#8221; Laville said. &#8220;You can regulate as much as you like, unless you can trust them [police officers], I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s going to work.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The Independent&#8217;s Paul Peachey added that there was a concern that the current eagerness to drive information through official channels &#8212; namely the police press office &#8212; would lead to less contact between the media and the force, and that restricting information further would be a &#8220;worrying trend for the way we hold the police in this country to account.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Jonathan Ungoed-Thomas of the Sunday Times told the Inquiry he disagreed with recording every exchange between journalists and police officers, as suggested in the recent\u00a0<a title=\"Filkin Report\" href=\"http:\/\/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/03\/Report-by-Elizabeth-Filkin.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Filkin report<\/a> into press-police relations.\u00a0&#8220;It would be a mistake to unnecessarily restrict flow of information between journalists and police officers,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<p>Laville defended using informal contacts as a source for information alongside official channels, noting that they often bring &#8220;texture&#8221; and &#8220;colour&#8221; that official sources might not provide.<\/p>\n<p>She disagreed with the view of former Metropolitan police commissioner\u00a0<a title=\"Index on Censorship - Condon warns of &quot;bureaucratic overreaction&quot; to press-police contact\" href=\"http:\/\/blog.indexoncensorship.org\/2012\/03\/06\/lord-condon-leveson\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Lord Condon<\/a>\u00a0that hospitality can be &#8220;the start of a grooming process that can lead to inappropriate or unethical behaviour&#8221;, calling the suggestion &#8220;faintly ludicrous&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;These people are grown-ups, they make life and death decisions,&#8221; Laville said.<\/p>\n<p id=\"block-10\">She said that she saw it as &#8220;perfectly legitimate&#8221; and part of &#8220;normal human relationships&#8221; for meetings between journalists and police officers to take place in a social setting, noting that taking contacts out for drinks occurs in every journalistic sector.<\/p>\n<p>She noted differences between Condon&#8217;s and Lord Stevens&#8217; commissionerships in dealing with the media.\u00a0&#8220;Under Lord Condon you could not talk to an officer without a press officer present,&#8221; Laville said, noting that his successor adopted a policy of &#8220;more openness&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>She stressed that the press and police have for years had a &#8220;mutually beneficial relationship&#8221; and that it was in the public interest. &#8220;It&#8217;s lasted for a long time because it actually works,&#8221; she said, but added that she believed that training on both sides could help to &#8220;understand each other&#8217;s worlds&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p><em>Follow Index on Censorship\u2019s coverage of the Leveson Inquiry on Twitter \u2013\u00a0<a title=\"Twitter - IndexLeveson\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/IndexLeveson\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">@IndexLeveson<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Crime reporters have lamented the current atmosphere of more restricted contact between\u00a0the press and police\u00a0at the Leveson Inquiry today. Testifying this morning, the Guardian&#8217;s Sandra Laville said that there has been an &#8220;over-reaction&#8221; by the Metropolitan police in response to the Inquiry into press standards, and that\u00a0&#8220;open lines of communication, which have been there for [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":57,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[3815],"tags":[14526,7427,7358,2931,14527,14528,2469],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93545"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/57"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=93545"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93545\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":109227,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93545\/revisions\/109227"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=93545"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=93545"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=93545"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}