{"id":93598,"date":"2012-05-16T14:58:55","date_gmt":"2012-05-16T14:58:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.indexoncensorship.org\/?p=8542"},"modified":"2019-09-16T13:27:16","modified_gmt":"2019-09-16T12:27:16","slug":"jack-straw-leveson-inquiry-privacy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/?p=93598","title":{"rendered":"Jack Straw calls for privacy law"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Former justice secretary Jack Straw has urged Parliament to amend the Human Rights Act to include a tort for breach of privacy.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I think parliament needs to take this job on now,&#8221; Straw told the <a title=\"Index on Censorship - Leveson Inquiry\" href=\"http:\/\/blog.indexoncensorship.org\/category\/leveson-inquiry-2\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Leveson Inquiry<\/a> today, adding that doing so would send a message to the public that they had &#8220;the right to have their privacy protected&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Echoing his 2011\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/farrarsbuilding.co.uk\/cmsAdmin\/uploads\/Lord_Williams_Memorial_Lecture.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Gareth Williams memorial lecture<\/a>, Straw said that legislating on privacy has gone\u00a0&#8220;through a side door&#8221; by relying on the HRA. There is no current tort on privacy in English common law, though <a href=\"http:\/\/www.legislation.gov.uk\/ukpga\/1998\/42\/section\/12\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">section 12 of the HRA<\/a>\u00a0says that a court must regard the extent to which a media defendant has complied with &#8220;any relevant privacy code&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p id=\"block-31\">Straw, who was Home Secretary from 1997-2001 and Foreign Secretary from 2001-2006, also claimed self-regulation of the press had &#8220;palpably failed&#8221; and that regulation with statutory underpinning was the only means of compelling newspaper groups to join into a system.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If you leave it to self-regulation we will end up with the absurd situation where they [the press] are judge and jury in their own courts,&#8221; Straw said, adding that the\u00a0press &#8220;can&#8217;t go on claiming every other institution in the land needs external regulation&#8221; while it continues to regulate itself.<\/p>\n<p>However he dismissed counsel Robert Jay QC&#8217;s suggestion of the possibility of state control in newspaper content as &#8220;nonsensical&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Straw flagged newsroom culture as an area of concern, adding that the press needed to be &#8220;more examining of what they are doing&#8221; and that the Inquiry itself provided a &#8220;mirror&#8221; for journalists.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;With luck, there\u2019ll be continuing momentum for change,&#8221; Straw said, contradicting former Downing Street spin doctor\u00a0<a title=\"Index on Censorship - Campbell defends Labour relationship with Murdoch\" href=\"http:\/\/blog.indexoncensorship.org\/2012\/05\/14\/alastair-campbell-rupert-murdoch-leveson-inquiry\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Alastair Campbell&#8217;s<\/a>\u00a0more pessimistic view that there was &#8220;no appetite&#8221; for media reform.<\/p>\n<p>He accused the British press of being &#8220;Quixotic&#8221;, telling Leveson: &#8220;one\u00a0day you\u2019re best thing since sliced bread, next your paternity is being questioned by the same newspaper&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>He added that there was a degree of &#8220;voyeurism&#8221; among some sections of British journalism that took &#8220;no account of the responsibility of decision-making&#8221; and that there was a &#8220;willful refusal&#8221; by the press to develop an understanding of how governance works. &#8220;They reduce it so much to personality and conflict,&#8221; Straw said, adding that newspapers had contributed to a culture in which politics is seen as boring or pointless.<\/p>\n<p>The Inquiry is currently focusing on relationships between the press and politicians, with Straw revealing that, during his time in the Cabinet (1997 to 2010), some newspapers were gradually &#8220;being favoured by particular ministers&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;They had these little groups,&#8221; he said, adding that it was &#8220;very incestuous and very unhealthy&#8221; and that both sides were to blame.<\/p>\n<p>Straw said one of the reasons the Blair government was too close to some of the press was because of its involvement with them during their time in opposition, a relationship it carried into Downing Street when it came to power in 1997.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Every politician wants to have the best relationship they can with the press,&#8221; Straw said, but warned one&#8217;s own position becomes &#8220;compromised&#8221; and it could &#8220;undermine your integrity&#8221; if relationships are too close.<\/p>\n<p>The Inquiry continues tomorrow, with evidence from former Sunday Times editor Sir Harry Evans and journalist Peter Oborne.<\/p>\n<p><em>Follow Index on Censorship\u2019s coverage of the Leveson Inquiry on Twitter \u2013\u00a0<a title=\"Twitter - IndexLeveson\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/IndexLeveson\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">@IndexLeveson<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Marta Cooper<\/strong>: Jack Straw calls for privacy law<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":57,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[3815],"tags":[431,117,7427,7358,3759,1966,269,2469],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93598"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/57"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=93598"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93598\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":109195,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93598\/revisions\/109195"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=93598"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=93598"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/newsite02may\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=93598"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}