Governments should not be policing thought

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Index does not believe the UK needs new laws to protect women from abuse and violence.

The UK already has dozens of laws on its books that make criminal the kind of abusive actions that are disproportionately targeted at women: rape, harassment, stalking. Despite this, the most egregious crimes against women frequently go unpunished. In the case of rape, conviction rates are woeful. A report published in 2017 found that only one in 14 rapes reported in England and Wales ended in a conviction.

Creating new laws that make misogyny a “hate crime” will do little to change this, as lawyers argued earlier this week. Nor are they likely to help change attitudes. In fact they can do the opposite.

Laws that criminalise speech are deeply problematic. In a free society, thoughts should not be criminal no matter how hateful they are. Yet laws that make “hate” criminal – in a well-meaning but misplaced effort to protect minorities and persecuted groups – are on the rise.

We should all be worried about this. As the US delegation noted in a United Nations Human Rights Council meeting in 2015, hate speech laws are increasingly being abused by those in power to target political opponents or to persecute the very minority groups such laws are meant to protect.

In addition, they do little to improve tolerance or treatment of such groups: “Such laws, including blasphemy laws, tend to reinforce divisions rather than promote societal harmony,” the US delegation said. “The presence of these laws has little discernible effect on reducing actual incidences of hate speech. In some cases such laws actually serve to foment violence against members of minority groups accused of expressing unpopular viewpoints.”

As if to prove their point, Russia used the same meeting to praise hate speech laws and the need to police hate speech in Ukraine so as not to ignite “nationalistic fires.”

Tackling hate requires changes in society’s attitude. Some of those changes need laws – such as those we rightly already have to outlaw discrimination in the workplace. Some require major changes in our institutions to the structures and practices that reinforce inequality. But prohibiting speech, or policing thought, is not the way to do this. [/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_basic_grid post_type=”post” max_items=”4″ element_width=”6″ grid_id=”vc_gid:1536237430689-ea8c7414-e758-3″ taxonomies=”6534″][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Authors send letter to His Royal Highness Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”102525″ img_size=”full” add_caption=”yes”][vc_column_text]Leading writers including Margaret Atwood, Elif Shafak and Claire Tomalin have signed an open letter to the king of Bahrain urging him to intervene in the case of a political prisoner being denied the right to read in jail.

Hassan Mushaima, a leader of the political opposition in Bahrain who was part of the country’s Arab spring protests, has faced repeated torture, and humiliating and degrading treatment in prison. A cancer sufferer, Mr Mushaima has been denied access to all but the most basic medical care. In the latest effort to break Mr Mushaima’s spirit, the prison authorities have confiscated all of the former English teacher’s books — more than 100 collected during his seven years in jail.

His son, Ali, who lives in exile in Britain, is on the 36th day of a hunger strike outside the Bahrain embassy in London protesting on behalf of his father.

“In some ways when you are prisoner, your books are not less important than your life-saving medication,” said Ali. “While your medicine physically saves your body, the books you have saves your mind in a place where life seems to stand still

“My father is a researcher and his books where how he spent his days in prison, they gave him purpose. Taking them away from him felt like a new way to suffocate him in his prison.”

The letter follows:

Your Highness,

We write to you on behalf of Bahraini activist Hassan Mushaima to ask for your assistance in assuring his fair treatment in jail and in particular the return or replacement of his books. Mr Mushaima is a leader of the political opposition in Bahrain and in 2011 was part of the Arab spring protests – a mass movement that peacefully called for human rights and democratic reforms in the kingdom.

Mr Mushaima, along with other leading human rights defenders and opposition figures – known collectively as the Bahrain 13 – was arrested, tortured and sentenced to life imprisonment, simply for calling for democracy.

Throughout his detention, Mr Mushaima has been subjected to humiliating, inhumane treatment in Jau prison. The torture he has endured has caused such severe problems that he has required surgery four times. Although Mr Mushaima has been allowed access to basic medical care in recent days following a hunger strike – which is still ongoing – by his son Ali Mushaima outside the Bahraini embassy in London, he has been denied access to other basic rights – such as access to reading material.

Over the past seven years, Mr Mushaima has accumulated a collection of more than 100 books in jail. These include books on history, religious teachings, and English dictionaries and grammar books. However, the prison authorities have now confiscated these books and we have since learned that they may have been destroyed. We ask your assistance in calling on prison authorities to return or replace these books – and to ensure Mr Mushaima’s fair treatment in prison.

Access to reading materials is considered to be a basic condition for humane treatment of prisoners worldwide: UN general assembly resolution 45/111 on the Basic Principles for the Treatment of Prisoners proclaims that “All prisoners shall have the right to take part in cultural activities and education aimed at the full development of the human personality.”

Mr Mushaima deserves to be treated with dignity. This is a right that should accorded to all prisoners. We urge you to restore Mr Mushaima’s dignity by returning his books.

Yours,

Lisa Appignanesi

Margaret Atwood

Amanda Craig

Ariel Dorfman

Daniel Hahn

Ruth Padel

Elif Shafak

Gillian Slovo

Ali Smith

Preti Taneja

Claire Tomalin[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_basic_grid post_type=”post” max_items=”12″ style=”load-more” items_per_page=”4″ element_width=”6″ grid_id=”vc_gid:1536223253239-45a7da5a-81c4-2″ taxonomies=”716″][/vc_column][/vc_row]

NGOs call for full repeal of Egypt’s “cybercrime” law and block of dangerous law regulating media

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]We, the undersigned, call for the immediate repeal of the Anti-Cyber and Information Technology Crimes Law (“The Cybercrime Law”), as well as the review and reform of articles on internet surveillance and blocking of websites in the law on the regulation of the press and media (“The Media Regulation Law”).

The Cybercrime Law and the Media Regulation Law are only the latest steps in the Egyptian government’s attempt to impose full control over the flow of information online, as part of an effort to close the space for public debate and prevent the exercise of the fundamental right to freedom of expression. These actions must be opposed in order to defend Egyptians’ human rights.

Background

On 18 August, 2018, President Sisi ratified the Anti-Cyber and Information Technology Crimes Law (Cybercrime Law). The Egyptian parliament had already approved the law on 5 July, granting the government new powers to restrict digital rights and interfere with activists’ freedoms online. Only last month, the parliament also passed another dangerous law  (the Media Regulation Law) that would place under government regulation and supervision as member of the media anyone with a social media account that has more than 5,000 followers.

Egyptian authorities have a recent history of escalating attempts to restrict online freedoms. On 24 May 2017, Egypt began to block websites, mostly media related, on a mass scale; the number of blocked websites so far totals more than 500. Apart from an order to block 33 websites issued by the government committee that appraised and seized the funds of members of a banned Muslim Brotherhood group, it is unclear on what basis the other websites have been blocked. No decision has been published, whether by the courts or government departments, and no reasons have been provided as to why those websites ought to be blocked. Numerous attempts have been made to get the government to disclose the legal basis for blocking, and a number of lawsuits have been filed before the administrative judiciary.

Now, the ratification of the Cybercrime Law appears to be an attempt by the government to legalize the repressive steps it took more than a year ago, providing full authority for internet censorship.

The Cybercrime Law also authorizes the mass surveillance of communications in Egypt. Under the law, ISPs are required to keep and store customer usage data for a period of 180 days, including data that enables user identification, data regarding content of the information system, and data related to the equipment used. This means that ISPs have the data related to all user activities, including phone calls and text messages, websites visited, and applications used on smartphones and computers. The National Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (NTRA) can also issue an administrative decision obliging telecommunications companies to save “other data” without specifying what it is, and without stipulating it in the law.

National security entities (defined by the law as: Presidency, Armed Forces, Ministry of the Interior, General Intelligence, and Administrative Control Authority) were also granted the right to access and review the data referred to in the preceding paragraph. ISPs are also obliged to provide the “technical capabilities” to those entities.

This approach to impose mass surveillance on all users in Egypt is contrary to Article 57 of the Egyptian Constitution, which states: “Private life is inviolable, safeguarded and may not be infringed upon. Telegraph, postal, and electronic correspondence, telephone calls, and other forms of communication are inviolable, their confidentiality is guaranteed, and they may only be confiscated, examined or monitored by causal judicial order, for a limited period, and in cases specified by the law.”  Egypt has also signed and ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and must follow the guidance of the Human Rights Committee, the only official body charged with interpreting the treaty.

In addition, the law regulating the work of the press and media, the Media Regulation Law, which the President ratified on September 1, 2018, expands the power to censor individuals’ personal accounts on social media, if the account has at least 5,000 followers. The Supreme Media Regulatory Council has the right to block those accounts if it believes that they publish or broadcast false news, incite a violation of the law, violence or hatred, discriminate between citizens, or advocate racism or intolerance.

Call to action

The Cybercrime Law and the Media Regulation Law threaten the fundamental rights of Egyptians. They are overbroad, disproportionate attempts to give the government full control over cyberspace. Therefore, to protect Egyptians’ human rights, preserve the public domain, and keep open any space for exercising freedom of expression, the undersigned call on the Egyptian government to immediately repeal the Cybercrime Law and reform the Media Regulation Law.

Signed, a coalition of some of the world’s leading human rights and digital rights organisations from 25 countries,

7amleh – Arab Center for Social Media Advancement

7iber

Access Now

Americans for Democracy & Human Rights in Bahrain (ADHRB)

Article 19

Association for Freedom of Thought and Expression (AFTE)

Association for Progressive Communications (APC)

Bahrain Centre for Human Rights

Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (CIHRS)

Community Media Solutions

Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ)

Democratic Transition and Human Rights Support Center (DAAM)

Derechos Digitales

Digital Rights Foundation

Electronic Frontier Foundation

Electronic Frontier Finland

Epicenter.works

Euromed Rights

Fight for the Future

Global Voices Advox

Gulf Centre for Human Rights

Humano Derecho Radio Estación

I’lam – Arab Center for Media Freedom Development and Research

i freedom Uganda Network

Index on Censorship

Internet Sans Frontieres

Kenya ICT Action Network

Fundación Karisma

Maharat Foundation

Majal.org

Motoon.org

DDHH Redes Ayuda

Open Media

Point of View India

REPORTERS SANS FRONTIÈRES / REPORTERS WITHOUT BORDERS

Social Media Exchange (SMEX)

Syrian Center for Media and Freedom of Expression

Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC)

Turkey Blocks

The Syrian Archive

Visualizing Impact

WITNESS

Xnet – Internet Freedoms[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_basic_grid post_type=”post” max_items=”12″ style=”load-more” items_per_page=”4″ element_width=”6″ grid_id=”vc_gid:1536246503666-e8c5e4e3-31d6-5″ taxonomies=”147″][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Contents: The Age of Unreason

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=”With contributions from Ian Rankin, Herta Müller, Peter Sands, Timandra Harkness, David Ulin, John Lloyd, Sheng Keyi and Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

The autumn 2018 issue of Index on Censorship magazine looks at the ways in which we might be turning away from facts and science across the globe.

We examine whether we have lost the art of arguing through Julian Baggini‘s piece on the dangers of offering a different viewpoint, and the ways we can get this art back through Timandra Harknesshow-to-argue guide. Peter Sands talks about the move towards more first person reporting in the news and whether that is affecting public trust in facts, while Jan Fox talks to tech experts about whether our love of social media “likes” is impacting our ability to think rationally.

We also go to the areas of the world where scientists are directly under threat, including Hungary, with Dan Nolan interviewing academics from the Hungarian Academy of Scientists, Turkey, where Kaya Genç discusses the removal of Darwin from secondary school education, and Nigeria, where the wellness trend sees people falling as much for pseudoscience as actual science, writes Wana Udobang.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”102490″ img_size=”full”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Outside of the special report, don’t miss our Banned Books Week special, featuring interviews with Kamila Shamsie, Olga Tokarczuk and Roberto Saviano. We also have contributions from Kenyan author Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o on his time in prison and how that might have shaped his creativity and Nobel Prize-winning writer Herta Müller on being questioned by Romanian secret police.

Finally, do not miss best-selling crime writer Ian Rankin‘s exclusive short story for the magazine and poems written by imprisoned British-Iranian mother Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, which are published here for the first time.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=”Special Report: The Age of Unreason”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Turkey’s unnatural selection, by Kaya Genç: Darwin is the latest victim of an attack on scientific values in Turkey’s education system

An unlikeable truth, by Jan Fox: Social media like buttons are designed to be addictive. They’re impacting our ability to think rationally

The I of the storm, by Peter Sands: Do journalists lose public trust when they write too many first-person pieces?

Documenting the truth, by Stephen Woodman: Documentaries are all the rage in Mexico, providing a truthful alternative to an often biased media

Cooking up a storm, by Wana Udobang: Wellness is finding a natural home in Nigeria, selling a blend of herbs – and pseudoscience

Talk is not cheap, by Julian Baggini: It’s only easy speaking truth if your truth is part of the general consensus. Differing viewpoints are increasingly unwelcome

Stripsearch, by Martin Rowson: Don’t believe the experts; they’re all liars

Lies, damned lies and lies we want to believe, by Rachael Jolley: We speak to TV presenter Evan Davis about why we are willing to believe lies, no matter how outlandish

How to argue with a very emotional person, by Timandra Harkness: A handy guide to debating successfully in an age when people are shying away from it

Brain boxes, by Tess Woodcraft: A neuroscientist on why some people are willing to believe anything, even that their brains can be frozen

Identity’s trump cards, by Sarah Ditum: We’re damaging debate by saying only those with a certain identity have a right to an opinion on that identity

How to find answers to life’s questions, by Alom Shaha: A physics teacher on why a career-focused science approach isn’t good for students thinking outside the box

Not reading between the lines, by David Ulin: Books aren’t just informative, they offer a space for quiet reflection. What happens if we lose the art of reading?

Campaign lines, by Irene Caselli: Can other campaigners learn from Argentina’s same-sex marriage advocates how to win change?

Hungary’s unscientific swivel, by Dan Nolan: First they came for the humanities and now Hungary’s government is after the sciences

China’s deadly science lesson, by Jemimah Steinfeld: How an ill-conceived campaign against sparrows contributed to one of the worst famines in history

Inconvenient truths, by Michael Halpern: It’s a terrible time to be a scientist in the USA, or is it? Where there are attacks there’s also resistance

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=”Global View”][vc_column_text]

Beware those trying to fix “fake news”, by Jodie Ginsberg: If governments and corporations become the definers of “fake news” we are in deep trouble

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=”In Focus”][vc_column_text]

Cry freedom, by Rachael Jolley: An interview with Trevor Phillips on the dangers of reporters shying away from the whole story

When truth is hunted, by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o: The award-winning Kenyan author on having his work hunted and why the hunters will never win

Return of Iraq’s silver screen, by Laura Silvia Battaglia: Iraq’s film industry is reviving after decades of conflict. Can it help the nation rebuild?

Book ends, by Alison Flood: Interviews with Olga Tokarczuk, Kamila Shamsie and Roberto Saviano about the best banned books

“Censorship of the word does not end on paper, but on the skin of human beings”, by Herta Müller: The Nobel prize-winning novelist and poet on the curious words that were banned in Romania and being threatened by the secret police

Pricing blogs off the screen, by Amanda Leigh Lichtenstein: The Tanzanian government is muzzling the nation’s bloggers through stratospheric fees

Modi’s strange relationship with the truth, Anuradha Sharma: The Indian prime minister only likes news that flatters him. Plus John Lloyd on why we should be more concerned about threats to Indian media than US media

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=”Culture”][vc_column_text]

Word search, by Ian Rankin: The master of crime writing spins a chilling tale of a world in which books are obsolete, almost, in an Index short story exclusive

Windows on the world, by Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe and Golrokh Ebrahimi Iraee: The British-Iranian mother and her fellow inmate on life inside Tehran’s notorious Evin prison. Plus poems written by both, published here for the first time

Metaphor queen, by Sheng Keyi: The Chinese writer on talking about China’s most sensitive subjects – and getting away with it, sort of. Also an exclusive extract from her latest book

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=”Column”][vc_column_text]

Index around the world, by Danyaal Yasin: A member of the new Index youth board from Pakistan discusses the challenges she faces as a journalist in her country

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=”Endnote”][vc_column_text]

Threats from China sent to UK homes, by Jemimah Steinfeld: Even outside Hong Kong, you’re not safe criticising Chinese-government rule there. We investigate threatening letters that have appeared in the UK

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/3″][vc_custom_heading text=”Subscribe”][vc_column_text]In print, online. In your mailbox, on your iPad.

Subscription options from £18 or just £1.49 in the App Store for a digital issue.

Every subscriber helps support Index on Censorship’s projects around the world.

SUBSCRIBE NOW[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/3″][vc_single_image image=”102479″ img_size=”medium”][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/3″][vc_custom_heading text=”Listen”][vc_column_text]The Autumn 2018 magazine podcast, featuring interviews with Academy of Ideas founder and director Claire Fox, Tanzanian blogger Elsie Eyakuze and Budapest-based journalist Dan Nolan.

LISTEN HERE[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Podcast: The Age of Unreason

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Are facts under attack? We explore this question in the Autumn issue of Index on Censorship magazine. In the podcast, we speak to Academy of Ideas founder and director Claire Fox about why we need to leave our echo chambers; Tanzanian blogger Elsie Eyakuze discusses a current blogging tax in her country pricing writers offline, and journalist Dan Nolan talks of the dangers that currently face scientists in Hungary.

Print copies of the magazine are available on Amazon, or you can take out a digital subscription via Exact Editions. Copies are also available at the BFI, the Serpentine Gallery and MagCulture (all London), News from Nowhere (Liverpool), Red Lion Books (Colchester) and Home (Manchester). Each magazine sale helps Index on Censorship continue its fight for free expression worldwide.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/3″][vc_custom_heading text=”The Age of Unreason”][vc_column_text]The autumn 2018 issue of Index on Censorship magazine explores the age of unreason. Are facts under attack? Can you still have a debate? We explore these questions in the issue, with science to back it up.

With: Timandra Harkness, Ian Rankin, Sheng Keyi[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/3″][vc_single_image image=”102479″ img_size=”medium”][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/3″][vc_custom_heading text=”Subscribe”][vc_column_text]In print, online. In your mailbox, on your iPad.

Subscription options from £18 or just £1.49 in the App Store for a digital issue.

Every subscriber helps support Index on Censorship’s projects around the world.

SUBSCRIBE NOW[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

From Hong Kong with love: the threatening letters being delivered to UK mailboxes (New Statesman, 4 September 2018)

“I am writing to give you a quick update about your neighbour the Sanctimonious Benedict Rogers and his futile attempt to destabilise Hong Kong/China with his hatred of the Chinese people and our political system.” Thus read a letter sent to Benedict Rogers and his neighbours in London this summer. The letter was postmarked from Hong Kong. It contained screenshots of Rogers, who runs human rights NGO and website Hong Kong Watch, at a recent Hong Kong Watch event. And it was the second such letter he and his neighbours had received in recent months. A separate letter went to his mother, who lives in Dorset, south-west England. Read the full article

The age of unreason

FEATURING

İshak Karakaş, encarcelado por tuitear sobre la operación de Turquía en Afrin

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”98264″ img_size=”full” add_caption=”yes”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

İshak Karakaş, editor jefe del Halkın Nabzı, un semanario de Estambul, es un hombre madrugador. Normalmente se levanta antes del amanecer y, para las 8 de la mañana, ya ha vuelto de dar un largo paseo con su grupo de dispares amigos del barrio. Después se pone a consultar la prensa del día mientras desayuna, a la par que tuitea apasionadamente sobre las últimas noticias.

El 20 de enero, el ejército turco dio comienzo a una operación en Afrin, un enclave sirio bajo control kurdo, alegando que las fuerzas kurdas de la región son una extensión del Partido de los Trabajadores del Kurdistán, al cual Turquía considera una organización terrorista. Karakaş, como muchos otros, se echó a Twitter para criticar la incursión militar. Lo hizo por medio de su cuenta @ishakkakarakas_, que su hijo y abogado Uğur Karakaş ya ha cerrado.

«No hay ni un solo grupo del Estado Islámico en Afrin. ¿Por qué mentís?», preguntó a los políticos turcos, quienes afirmaban que las fuerzas kurdas en Siria son en realidad militantes del EI. «No os creáis la propaganda de la tele sobre Afrin», avisaba a sus conciudadanos en otro tuit. También retuiteó un artículo que aseguraba que el ejército turco había matado a civiles en la región.

Entonces fue cuando fueron a buscarlo.

«Rondaba la medianoche. Mi padre dormía. Yo no estaba en casa, pero mi madre, sí. La policía llegó y aporreó la puerta; decían tener una orden de registro», relata Karakaş, abogado defensor afincado en Estambul. Arrestaron a su padre el 26 de enero, acusado de «difundir propaganda terrorista» a través de Twitter. Actualmente se encuentra en la prisión de Silivri, sin acusación a la vista.

Un país sin humor

Karakaş no fue ni mucho menos el único en sufrir la ira del estado en guerra de Turquía. Según el ministerio del interior del país, para el 27 de febrero la policía ya había detenido a 845 personas por criticar la operación en Afrin (o por «difundir propaganda de una organización terrorista», como el ministerio prefiere describirlo), a la que Turquía ha nombrado oficialmente ‘Operación Rama de olivo’. Si bien el ministerio no ha revelado a cuántos de esos detenidos han acusado oficialmente y encarcelado, a juzgar por el hecho de que sus documentos judiciales indican que los ocho a los que prendieron junto a Karakaş fueron arrestados, es muy probable la cifra sea elevada.

Karakaş nació en 1960 en Diyarbakır. Tras completar la educación primaria empezó a trabajar como ayudante para camioneros a los 12 años. En 1989 se vio obligado a migrar a Estambul, como muchos otros kurdos en aquella época, junto a su mujer, Müzeyyen, y su primogénito, Uğur (Azad). Los otros hijos de la pareja, Umut y Ufuk, nacieron en la ciudad. «Es un patriota y siempre le ha interesado mucho la política», rememora Uğur Karakaş. Aunque trabajó en logística hasta que su empresa quebró tras a la crisis financiera turca de 2000, Karakaş siempre estuvo involucrado en política y escribía columnas para el medio pro-kurdo Özgür Gündem y el socialista Evrensel.

La vida en Estambul y Halkın Nabzı

A pesar de dedicarse al comercio desde que se mudó a Estambul, sacó tiempo para completar su educación secundaria con cursos a distancia. Según el registro de su interrogatorio, se encuentra actualmente cursando el segundo año de la carrera de sociología por Açıköğretim, una universidad turca de aprendizaje a distancia. También se aseguró de que sus hijos tuvieran mejores oportunidades en la vida: uno es abogado y el otro, médico. El menor está cursando una licenciatura de ingeniería informática.

«Incluso antes de ser periodista siempre le interesaron los problemas del país», asegura Ahmet Tulgar, un veterano reportero turco que lleva más de seis años publicando Halkın Nabzı junto a Karakaş. Sus caminos se cruzaron en charlas y reuniones antes de que decidiesen trabajar juntos oficialmente. Karakaş se quedó sin trabajo en logística y Tulgar dejó su empleo en el periódico BirGün en la segunda mitad de la década de los 2000. Fue entonces cuando los dos hombres fundaron una empresa de publicidad en el distrito Maltepe de Estambul, que es desde donde se publica Halkın Nabzı a día de hoy.

«Es un hombre familiar. Venía al trabajo después de su paseo matutino y por la tarde se iba derecho a casa. En 2013 decidimos que editaríamos juntos un periódico local, pero no iba a ser como esas publicaciones locales cuyas únicas noticias son cosas como dónde cenó el alcalde o las últimas aventuras amorosas de la gente poderosa de la comunidad», dice Tulgar.

Y así fue como nació Halkın Nabzı. Con distribución en el lado asiático de Estambul y financiado por negocios y municipios locales, el periódico semanal tiene una tirada de 10.000 ejemplares. Dada la visión y trayectoria de sus fundadores, no sorprende el énfasis de Halkın Nabzı en el periodismo de calidad: el periódico valora su independencia por encima de todo. Pone el foco en noticias locales al mismo tiempo que mantiene su relevancia en el debate nacional. Según Tulgar, la política editorial de Halkın Nabzı viene definida por «un periodismo de paz que engloba todos los segmentos de la sociedad y utiliza un estilo comprensible por todos». Y se apresura a añadir: «Los tuits de İshak no reflejan nuestra línea editorial, claro está».

Un hombre familiar

«Ya no es que hayan metido a un hombre como él en la cárcel, es que deberían recompensarlo por haber encontrado la fórmula para la paz en este país», dice Tulgar, que añade que los participantes de los paseos matutinos de Karakaş (Tulgar, que prefiere dormir por las mañanas, no es uno de ellos), provienen de contextos diversos y políticamente opuestos.

«Es un hombre de paz. Supongo que eso se puede decir de cualquiera, pero él quería ser un soldado de paz. Por desgracia, han metido en la cárcel a un hombre así», dice Tulgar. También se queja, bromeando, de que Uğur y él llevan unas semanas teniendo que recurrir a la comida rápida. «Siempre nos hacía el almuerzo en la oficina. A veces otra gente del edificio venía y nos preguntaba si podían comer un poco de lo que había cocinado, algún día que no encontraban nada bueno que encargar».

Para Tulgar, la ausencia de Karakaş supone mucho más que perderse un almuerzo sano y sustancioso. Durante el primer par de años que siguieron a la fundación del periódico, estuvieron prácticamente ellos solos. «Claro que es duro, después de pasar tanto tiempo juntos trabajando», admite, algo resentido con su amigo por haber tuiteado «irresponsablemente» .

Lo que Tulgar no cuenta es cómo ha compartido con su compañero encarcelado el estrés diario de lanzar una publicación, y cómo han tenido que hacer frente a la ansiedad que provoca tratar de producir periodismo de calidad en uno de los países más peligrosos para la profesión. Los dos hombres han librado batallas uno junto al otro, y ahora uno de ellos está en la cárcel.

Aunque imputasen a Karakaş, lo liberarían: si bien la propaganda está penada con dos años de prisión, sentencias así tienden a suspenderse bajo los procedimientos criminales turcos, según Uğur Karakaş.

«Tiene una familia inmensa. Ya es abuelo y tiene otro nieto de camino. Uğur se casa este verano», añade Tulgar.

En vista de la situación general en Turquía, en un país en el que hay 153 periodistas en prisión y hace solo dos semanas condenaron a seis de ellos a cadena perpetua sin libertad condicional, es un consuelo saber que Karakaş podría salir libre en su primer juicio.

Tulgar baja la voz y, más despacio, dice: «Murat Sabuncu de Cumhuriyet, una joya de hombre; Ahmet Şık, que es un buenísimo periodista y nunca ha buscado el beneficio personal ni la fama; Akın Atalay, están todos en la cárcel. Osman Kavala también está en la cárcel. Hay tantas bellísimas personas en prisión que da vergüenza quejarse y decir ‘pues mi amigo lleva mes y medio en la cárcel’».

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

New Yorker succumbs to hecklers’ veto

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Index on Censorship CEO Jodie Ginsberg tweets her reaction to the announcement that Steve Bannon has been disinvited from a New Yorker event after protests about his inclusion.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_basic_grid post_type=”post” max_items=”4″ element_width=”6″ grid_id=”vc_gid:1536053294010-62264f79-c574-4″ taxonomies=”6534″][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Academic’s indictment reflects the Turkish government’s criminalisation of free speech

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”102432″ img_size=”full”][vc_column_text]Hanifi Barış, an outspoken Kurdish academic and lawyer, has been imprisoned by Turkish authorities since 4 July 2018. His detention for sharing press articles on social media is another demonstration of the repeated attacks against freedom of expression and critical opinions in Turkey.

Hanifi Barış obtained his Ph.D from the Centre for Citizenship, Civil Society and Rule of Law at the University of Aberdeen in 2017. Interested in political theory and human rights, he has published several articles and book chapters on Kurdish politics. After completing his dissertation, Barış moved back to Turkey and settled in Istanbul, where he started working as a lawyer. In his roles as an academic and a lawyer, Barış stood out as an ardent defender of human rights. In 2012, he drew public attention for representing a famous conscientious objector and defending his client’s rights to answer to the court in Kurdish. In January 2016, he was one of the Academics for Peace who signed the petition “We will not be a party to this crime”, which denounced the state-sanctioned violence in the Kurdish regions and called on the Turkish government to re-establish peace negotiations.

On 3 July, Barış received a call from Istanbul Bakırköy Police station, asking him to give a statement about his social media posts. The next day, after giving his statement to the police, he was referred to the court, where the prosecutor requested his arrest. He was accused of producing “terrorist propaganda” on the ground of article 7/2 of the Anti-Terror Law no 3713. Barış had shared news articles and commentaries from international and local media on his Facebook and Twitter accounts. It is worth emphasising that he did not add any of his own commentary on the posts. At the court’s request Barış was sent to prison on the same day. Since then, the appeals of his lawyer, Mehmet Doğan, for his release pending trial have been repeatedly denied. Even worse, when Barış asked to be moved to another dormitory in Silivri Prison, he was sent to an individual cell and remained in solitary confinement for 12 days.

On 23 July 2018, İstanbul’s 29th High Criminal Court accepted the indictment against Barış and re-affirmed his pre-trial detention. The Court based its decision on an ongoing assessment of digital materials that had been supposedly confiscated during an alleged search of his residence and belongings. However, no such search ever took place. This blatant disregard for the rule of law and due process casts serious doubts on Barış’s prospect for a fair trial, highlighting Turkey’s systematic use of pre-trial detention as a means of intimidation.

The news and commentaries shared by Barış on social media were critical of the Turkish government and its policies in Syria. They included articles from websites such as The Guardian and Foreign Policy. It is absurd to construe those articles as “terrorist propaganda” under article 7/2 of the Anti-Terror Law, which criminalises statements “justifying or  praising or inciting the terrorist organizations’ methods which contain violence, force or threat”. Rather, Barış’s indictment reflects the Turkish government’s criminalisation of free speech and attempt to silence all critical opinions. Just as the repression of critical newspapers and media has been on the rise in recent years, arrests on the ground of social media posts have witnessed a dramatic increase. While the crackdown has particularly targeted Kurdish politicians and activists, journalists, students, lawyers and academics, arbitrary arrests of social media users serve as a warning to all who voice their dissent against the current Turkish regime.

Since early July, Academics for Peace, Barış’s colleagues from the University of Aberdeen and human rights organisations have strongly protested against his detention. An ongoing petition asking for his immediate release has received almost 5,000 signatures. Many of those who signed are internationally-renowned academics. At the University of Aberdeen, which has actively sought to mobilise support since Barış’s arrest, one of his colleagues describes him as “a clear-headed scholar, who draws on his experience as a practising lawyer to make original contributions to thinking on political community and direct or semi-direct democracy”. Barış, he says, is “the kind of scholar who could find common ground with academics from almost any perspective: always good-natured, cheerful and unfailingly kind to everyone he interacted with.”

Barış’s first hearing is scheduled for Sep 18th. International observers are invited to monitor his hearing at Çağlayan Courthouse, with the hope that Barış will be immediately released and cleared of unfounded accusations.[/vc_column_text][vc_cta h2=”TAKE ACTION” h4=”Sign the petition calling for the release of Hanifi Baris” color=”pink”]ACADEMICS, COLLEAGUES AND FRIENDS DEMAND THE IMMEDIATE RELEASE OF UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN LAWYER DR HANIFI BARIŞ FROM PRISON IN TURKEY[/vc_cta][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]

Academic Freedom

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”3/4″][vc_column_text]

Free speech is vital to the free flow of thoughts and ideas. We protect freedom of expression in academia by challenging attempts to restrict free speech on campus.

Learn more about our work supporting academic freedom.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_basic_grid post_type=”post” max_items=”4″ element_width=”6″ grid_id=”vc_gid:1536049683445-c8237d77-0e30-6″ taxonomies=”55, 8843″][/vc_column][/vc_row]