THE IMPACT OF SLAPPS ON EUROPE'S MEDIA

An investigation into the chilling effect of vexatious lawsuits targeting journalists

The focus of this project is to provide an insight into the extent to which journalists and media outlets in Europe are being affected by a type of vexatious legal action known as a Slapp – a strategic lawsuit against public participation.

Slapps are used by powerful actors (including corporations, public officials, high-profile businesspeople) in an attempt to stop individuals or organisations from expressing critical views on issues of public interest. Although they are disguised as ordinary civil claims, such as defamation or privacy, they are not intended to succeed in court. Instead, their goal is to saddle critics with prohibitively expensive, time-consuming, and nerve-wracking legal processes.

Slapps threaten not only freedom of expression and media freedom, but access to information, rule of law, and our very democracy.

LEARN MORE ABOUT SLAPPS

AND WHAT TO DO IF YOU'RE FACING ONE

?

Model Anti-SLAPP law

The UK Anti-SLAPP Coalition has drawn up this model law in consultation with senior lawyers

Letter to UK Justice Secretary...

Editors, journalists, lawyers and academics write to Dominic Raab to express support for the Model UK Anti-SLAPP Law launched by the UK Anti-SLAPP Coalition

REPORT: Slapped Down

Six journalists speak about the legal efforts to silence them over their reporting

AM I FACING A SLAPP?

If you are a journalist, use our interactive tool to find out whether you are likely to be subject to a SLAPP

?

Strategic lawsuits against public participation (Slapps) are a form of legal harassment aimed at intimidating and ultimately silencing those that speak out on issues that are of political or societal significance. Slapps affect journalists, activists, academics, and civil society organisations, but this tool is specifically aimed at helping journalists to understand whether the legal threat or action they are facing might be classified as a Slapp.

This assessment is intended as a helpful tool and not as legal advice.

The questions asked in this assessment are based on research carried out by Index on Censorship into how Slapps against journalists most commonly manifest themselves. If your answers coincide with the most common symptoms of a Slapp, then you are more likely to be told that you are facing a Slapp. For example, journalists facing Slapps are more likely to be sued individually, even if they are employed with news organisations. Therefore, if you indicate in the assessment that you are being sued as an individual, you are more likely to be told you are facing a SLAPP.

Your answers are not shared with third parties and Index on Censorship does not store IP addresses so your answers are completely anonymised.

 

Are you a freelance journalist or do you work for a media organisation?

Les poursuites stratégiques contre la mobilisation publique (ou poursuites-bâillons) sont une forme de harcèlement judiciaire visant à intimider et finalement à réduire au silence les associations ou individus qui s’expriment sur des questions d’importance politique ou sociétale. Les poursuites-bâillons touchent les journalistes, activistes, universitaires et organisations de la société civile, mais cet outil vise spécifiquement à aider les journalistes à comprendre si la menace ou l’action en justice dont ils font l’objet peut être classée comme poursuite-bâillon.

Ce questionnaire est destiné à être un outil utile et non un conseil juridique.

Les questions posées dans cette évaluation sont basées sur des recherches menées par Index on Censorship sur la manière dont les poursuites-bâillons contre les journalistes se manifestent le plus souvent. Si vos réponses coïncident avec les symptômes les plus courants d’une poursuite-bâillon, on vous dira probablement que vous êtes confronté à une poursuite-bâillon. Par exemple, les journalistes confrontés à des poursuites-bâillons sont plus susceptibles d’être poursuivis individuellement, même s’ils sont employés par des organes de presse. En conséquence, si vous indiquez dans le questionnaire que vous êtes poursuivi en tant qu’individu, on vous dira probablement que vous êtes confronté à une poursuite-bâillon.

Vos réponses ne sont pas communiquées à des tiers et Index on Censorship ne stocke pas les adresses IP. Vos réponses sont donc totalement anonymes.

Êtes-vous un journaliste indépendant ou travaillez-vous pour une entreprise de médias?

Die strategische Klage gegen öffentliche Beteiligung (engl. ‚strategic lawsuit against public participation‘, kurz: SLAPP) ist eine rechtsmissbräuchliche Klageform, die darauf abzielt, diejenigen einzuschüchtern und letztlich zum Schweigen zu bringen, die öffentlich zu Problemen Stellung beziehen, die von politischer oder gesellschaftlicher Bedeutung sind. SLAPPS können zwar gegen Journalist*innen, Aktivist*innen, Akademiker*innen und zivilgesellschaftliche Organisationen erhoben werden. Dieses Tool ist aber vornehmlich dafür gedacht, Journalist*innen zu vermitteln, ob ihnen eine tatsächliche Klageandrohung oder ein Rechtsverfahren bevorstehen oder ob es sich bei der Drohung um eine SLAPP handelt.

Das per Tool ermittelte Bewertungsergebnis ist als Richtungsweisung und nicht als Rechtsberatung gedacht.

Die zur Bewertung gestellten Fragen basieren auf von Index on Censorship durchgeführten Studien zur Art und Weise in welcher SLAPPS am häufigsten gegen Journalist*innen eingesetzt werden. Wenn Ihre Antworten den häufigsten Charakteristika einer SLAPP entsprechen, dann ist die Wahrscheinlichkeit höher, dass Sie es laut Bewertung mit einer SLAPP zu tun haben. Beispielsweise werden Journalist*innen, denen mit SLAPPS gedroht wird, eher als Einzelpersonen verklagt, selbst wenn sie bei Nachrichtendiensten angestellt sind. Wenn Sie also im Tool angeben, dass Sie als Einzelperson verklagt werden, ist die Wahrscheinlichkeit höher, dass das Bewertungsergebnis zugunsten einer SLAPP ausfällt.

Ihre Antworten werden weder an Dritte weitergegeben, noch speichert Index on Censorship IP-Adressen, sodass Ihre Angaben vollständig anonymisiert bleiben.

 

Sind Sie freie/r Journalist*in oder arbeiten Sie für einen Mediendienst?

Las SLAPP (siglas en inglés de “demanda estratégica contra la participación pública”) son una forma de acoso judicial que tiene por objetivo intimidar y, en última instancia, silenciar a las personas que denuncian problemas de interés político o social.

Este cuestionario está ideado como herramienta práctica, no para sustituir a un asesoramiento jurídico.

Las preguntas incluidas en este cuestionario se basan en investigaciones realizadas por Index on Censorship acerca de las formas más habituales que toman las SLAPP contra periodistas. Cuanto más coincidan tus respuestas con los síntomas más comunes de una SLAPP, más probable será que se te indique que te enfrentas a un caso de SLAPP. Por ejemplo: en los casos de SLAPP es más probable que se presenten demandas personales contra los/as/es periodistas, aunque trabajen en plantilla para una agencia o medio informativo. Por lo tanto, si indicas en el cuestionario que se ha presentado una demanda personal contra ti, será más probable que te indiquen que te enfrentas a un caso de SLAPP.

Tus respuestas son totalmente anónimas, ya que Index on Censorship no las comparte con terceros ni almacena direcciones IP.

 

¿Eres periodista independiente o trabajas para un medio de comunicación?

Pozwy zastraszające typu SLAPP (z ang. “strategic lawsuit against public participation”: strategiczny pozew sądowy przeciwko działalności publicznej) to forma prawnego nękania mającego na celu zastraszenie i uciszenie osób wypowiadających się na tematy polityczne lub społeczne. Pozwy typu SLAPP mogą spotkać dziennikarzy/rki, aktywistów/tki, badaczy/czki i organizacje pracujące na rzecz społeczeństwa obywatelskiego; nasz instrument ma służyć dziennikarzom/rkom w celu sprawdzenia, czy wystosowane przeciw nim groźby prawne lub powództwo sądowe można zakwalifikować jako SLAPP.

Nasza ankieta ma być pomocnym instrumentem i nie stanowi oficjalnej porady prawnej.

Zawarte w niej pytania opierają się na badaniach przeprowadzonych przez Index on Censorship na temat tego, jak najczęściej wyglądają pozwy typu SLAPP wnoszone przeciw prasie. Im bardziej Twoje odpowiedzi pokrywają się z charakterystycznymi cechami takiego pozwu, tym bardziej prawdopodobne, że masz z nim do czynienia. Np.: pozwy typu SLAPP są częściej wytaczane przeciwko indywidualnym dziennikarzom/rkom, nawet jeśli zatrudnia ich organizacja prasowa. Jeśli zatem odpowiesz w ankiecie, że ktoś pozywa Cię do sądu jako jednostkę, jest bardziej prawdopodobne, że grozi Ci SLAPP.

Twoje odpowiedzi są całkowicie anonimowe: Index on Censorship nie udostępni ich osobom trzecim i nie przechowuje adresów IP.

 

Pracujesz jako wolny strzelec, czy zatrudnia Cię organizacja medialna?

READ MORE ON SLAPPS

Twenty-four organisations express solidarity with the Swedish media outlet Realtid

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Twenty-four organisations express their solidarity with the Swedish business and finance publication, Realtid, its editor, and the two journalists being sued for defamation in London. Realtid are due before the High Court tomorrow...

SLAPPS: A Threat to Our Freedom of Expression and Our Democracy

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image="120663" img_size="full" onclick="custom_link" link="https://www.eventbrite.ie/e/slapps-a-threat-to-our-freedom-of-expression-and-our-democracy-tickets-558832341577"][vc_column_text] Strategic lawsuits against public...

Slapp lawsuit against Swedish magazine Realtid filed in London

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image="115804" img_size="full"][vc_column_text]Index on Censorship has joined with other press freedom organisations to strongly condemn the legal action that has been filed at the London High Court against the Swedish business and...

Index condemns lawsuits brought by ENRC against Tom Burgis

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text] The undersigned organisations express their serious concern at the legal proceedings that have been filed in a UK court against journalist and author Tom Burgis, his publisher HarperCollins, and his employer the Financial Times...

Contents – China’s global brand: a century of silencing dissent

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text] Index looks back on 100 years of the Chinese Communist Party and how their censorship laws continue to shape the lives of people around the world and threaten their right to free speech. Inside this edition are articles by exiled...

Urgent action is needed to defend our media

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image="116630" img_size="full" add_caption="yes"][vc_column_text]“We call on governments to translate their public commitments on the protection of journalism and safety of journalists into working realities backed up by effective...

Index condemns lawsuit against Bellingcat founder Eliot Higgins

The undersigned organisations express their serious concern at the legal proceedings being brought in London against journalist Eliot Higgins, founder of the investigative journalism outlet Bellingcat. The lawsuit is being taken by Yevgeniy Prigozhin, a Russian...

Daphne Caruana Galizia: Four years on from her murder, Malta must be held to account

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image="117699" img_size="full" add_caption="yes" alignment="center"][vc_column_text]The following remarks were made by Caoilfhionn Gallagher, QC of Doughty Street Chambers, a member of the international legal team for the family of...

Contents – Whistleblowers: the lifeblood of democracy

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text] Index's new issue of the magazine looks at the importance of whistleblowers in upholding our democracies. Featured are stories such as the case of Reality Winner, written by her sister Brittany. Despite being released from prison,...

Index and 21 other organisations condemn lawsuits brought by ENRC against public watchdogs

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image="116855" img_size="full" add_caption="yes"][vc_column_text](7 June 2021, London) - A legal case currently before the UK courts highlights the egregious tactics being used by Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation Limited...