As reporters and organisations representing the interests of media workers and the broader rights of free expression and privacy, we have come together to highlight the extreme danger that the UK’s plan to break end-to-end encryption poses to investigative journalism and even to the lives of journalists.
Cases such as Breen v PSNI (2009) have shown that reporters – particularly those who report on terrorism and criminal gangs – may face a serious threat to their lives if they cannot guarantee source protection, and as such can claim legal rights under Article 2 and Article 10 of the ECHR.
The current proposal by the UK government would mean that UK-based reporters using end-to-end encrypted services such as Signal, WhatsApp and other vital tools, would be forced to deal with government-mandated vulnerabilities in messaging systems that much of the rest of the world considers secure.
In an age of global media, but also international organised crime and rising transnational repression by autocratic states, the UK, which for centuries has provided a home for free speech and free media and a haven for dissidents seeking refuge from the secret police of their own lands, risks becoming the place where freedom dies.
As MPs gather to debate this potentially disastrous law, we urge the government to rethink its dangerous encryption-breaking law which endangers journalism and journalists at home and around the world.
Signed,
Index on Censorship
National Union of Journalists (UK)
International Press Institute
European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)
European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)
Global Forum for Media Development
International Federation of Journalists (IFJ)
Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP)
Osservatorio Balcani Caucaso Transeuropa (Italy)
Carole Cadwalladr (personal capacity)
Association of European Journalists (AEJ)
Big Brother Watch (UK)
Open Rights Group (UK)
Electronic Frontier Foundation
