New issue of Index on Censorship out now

index-on-censorship-obscenity

Index on Censorship: I know it when I see it

From Ulysses to Last Exit to Brooklyn, obscenity trials are a benchmark for the limits of cultural tolerance. As the first prosecution of the written word in more than 30 years takes place in the UK, Index on Censorship assesses the landscape.

Are we becoming less permissive than our parents? Is the Obscene Publications Act fit for purpose? Should governments control what we see online to protect our children? Leading commentators on the subject give their verdict.

Anthony Julius and Julian Petley: a discussion on art, obscenity and the law
Read exclusively free here!

John Ozimek: the technology revolution is redefining the boundaries

Tony Bennett: comic books are not just for kids

Julian Petley on the prospects for free speech online
Read exclusively free here!

Marjorie Heins says the Internet is making the law unworkable

Anne Higonnet on why artists are heading for a collision course
Read exclusively free here!

Elena Martellozzo and Helen Taylor assess the impact of child pornography

Seth Finkelstein on the censoring of obscenity online

BBFC film examiner Murray Perkins gives the lowdown
Read exclusively free here!

Also in this issue

INDEX IN IRAQ
Rohan Jayasekera on Iraq’s year of elections

DISPATCHES
Shahvalad Chobanoglu says independent press in Azerbaijan is struggling to survive

Sanjuana Martinez exposes a culture of censorship in Mexico

Sanjana Hattotuwa explains the chilling effect of legislation in Sri Lanka

THE ART OF OFFENCE
Martin Rowson says breaking taboos is the heart of satire

FICTION: CUBA
Ena Lucia Portela ‘The last passenger’

For subscription details and stockists, click here

Ukraine: The politics of hunger

Ukraine memorialThe battle over the legacy of the Ukranian famine threatens to divide the country, writes Michael Foley

So often that which politicians hope will unite their countries does exactly the opposite. The legacy of the famines which devasted Ukraine in the 1930s might do just that. Ukraine’s President Viktor Yushchenko is to campaign internationally for the famine, or the Holodomor, as it is called in Ukrainian, that killed possibly as many as 10 million people in 1932-3 to be recognised by the United Nations as genocide. Mr Yushkenko is hoping to complete his task by November, 2008, to mark 75th anniversary of the Holodomor.

In November last year a law was tabled in the Ukrainian parliament in November making it illegal to deny the Holodomor.

The famine of 1932 and 1933 was a man-made one. Unlike, for instance, the Irish Famine of the 1840s, no crops failed. The Holodomor was the result of Stalin’s farm collectivisation programme. When in 1932 the grain harvest did not meet imposed targets, Communist party activists travelled to Ukraine’s villages and confiscated all the grain and bread, and all other foodstuffs, ensuring starvation. Watchtowers were erected in order to make sure no peasants tried to take a few ears of corn.

The confiscations continued into 1933, with devastating results. It is uncertain how many died, and most Ukrainians knew little of the famine due to the extreme secrecy of the Soviet period, but with records now open and historical investigations taking place, it is believed as many as 10 million people may have perished.

(more…)

About Index

Index on Censorship is an international organisation that promotes and defends the right to freedom of expression. The inspiration of poet Stephen Spender, Index was founded in 1972 to publish the untold stories of dissidents behind the Iron Curtain. Today, we fight...
SUPPORT INDEX'S WORK