European Court rejects Max Mosley appeal
26 Sep 2011![]()
Former motorsport boss turned privacy campaigner Max Mosley has had his appeal to the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights rejected. Mosley had hoped to overturn a May ruling establishing that media outlets were not required to notify the subjects of stories in advance of publication. But the court today announced that that judgment would be final.
Solicitor Mark Stephens, who represented Index on Censorship, the Media Legal Defence Initiative and other interested parties in the case, said today: “This decision by the Grand Chamber and the previous decision by the court underline the recommendation made by the UK parliament’s Culture Media and Sport Committee. This is a great day for free speech in Britain and throughout Europe.”
Index on Censorship news editor Padraig Reidy commented: “Index submitted its concerns about Mr Mosley’s prior-notification plans as we recognised the threat such an obligation would pose to investigative journalism. While privacy is of course a concern, forcing newspapers to reveal stories would have a serious chilling effect.”
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
« The Art Issue • Kuwait: Man jailed for comments on Twitter »



News: Max Mosley – Grand Chamber refuses to rehear “pre- notification” application « Inforrm's Blog
[...] free speech campaigners have welcomed the Grand Chamber’s decision (see for example, Index on Censorship), there continues to be a pressing need to address the protection of privacy from unwarranted [...]
Mosley loses European court appeal » News of the World to Re brand as The Sun on Sunday?
[...] Sources: Index on Censorship/Inforrm [...]
Chequered Flag…Max Mosley’s case to notify people prior to press exposure fails at the Grand Chamber of the European Court « Melon Farmers Blog
[...] See article from indexoncensorship.org [...]
Mosley loses European court appeal | dailywebday.com
[...] concern, forcing newspapers to reveal stories would have a serious chilling effect.”Sources: Index on Censorship/Inforrm guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010Published via the Guardian [...]