Index responds to Leveson Royal Charter

18 Mar 2013

Index logo xIndex on Censorship Chair Jonathan Dimbleby has issued the following statement on behalf of Index’s trustees:

“As Chair of Index on Censorship, I have to report that the Index board of trustees – who all occupy senior positions in roles both within and outside of the media — is dismayed at the course of developments that have been taken in establishing a new press regulator.

The board has the gravest anxiety at the residual political powers the now expected outcome and system will give to politicians. The two-thirds block on any changes to the royal charter could be abused in the future — not least when today’s emerging consensus shows that the parties can come together in both houses to agree on press regulation.”

Earlier today, Index on Censorship CEO Kirsty Hughes called the (emerging) deal on press regulation a “sad day for press freedom in the UK”. She said that “Index is against the introduction of a Royal Charter that determines the details of establishing a press regulator in the UK — the involvement of politicians undermines the fundamental principle that the press holds politicians to account. Politicians have now stepped in as ringmaster and our democracy is tarnished as a result.

She also said:

“Requiring a two third majority from both Houses for future changes in the Royal Charter introduces political involvement for all time into press regulation in the UK. It is a bleak moment for the UK’s international reputation as a country where press freedom is cherished as a fundamental principle and right.

The fact that this requirement is now being applied to all Royal Charters is a rushed and fudged attempt to pretend this is not just a press law; it resembles precisely the kind of political manoeuvring we see in Hungary today – where the government is amending its own constitution through a parliamentary vote undermining key principles of their democracy.

ALSO READ KIRSTY HUGHES ANALYSIS OF THE PRINCIPLES AT STAKE IN ROYAL CHARTER DEBATE

Talk about this story

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • Blogger
  • StumbleUpon
  • Email
  • RSS

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

«  •  »

  1. Press regulation: Hacked Off and the pro-Leveson camp need to take their opponents' concerns seriously – Telegraph Blogs

    March 18, 2013 at 14:22

    [...] people on the broader Left have expressed a range of concerns: Nick Cohen of The Observer; Index on Censorship; the lawyer David Allen Green; the Guardian investigative journalist James Ball. These are not [...]

  2. Index on Censorship responds to party leaders' comments in debate on Royal Charter | Index on Censorship

    March 18, 2013 at 18:46

    [...] Also read: Statement from Index Chair Jonathan Dimbleby on behalf of Index’s board of trustees [...]

  3. Media after Leveson | Martin Cloake

    March 19, 2013 at 23:13

    [...] websites, bloggers – worry about the costs of both signing up and not signing up. And I see Index on Censorship, English PEN and the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe – a broad range of [...]

3 Responses to “Index responds to Leveson Royal Charter”