Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

Statement

Forcing The Guardian to destroy materials is a direct attack on press freedom

By Index on Censorship / 20 August, 2013

 In an article in today’s Guardian, editor Alan Rusbridger reports that the newspaper was coerced into destroying material that related to its revelations about state surveillance.

The Chief Executive of Index on Censorship, Kirsty Hughes said:

“Using the threat of legal action to force a newspaper into destroying material is a direct attack on press freedom in the UK. It is unclear which laws would have been used to force the Guardian to hand over its material but it is clear that the Snowden and NSA story is strongly in the public interest. Coming on the back of the detention of David Miranda, it seems that the UK government is using, and quite likely misusing,  laws to intimidate journalists and silence its critics.”

Tags: |

Challenge censorship. Stand up for free expression. Support Index.

2 Responses to Forcing The Guardian to destroy materials is a direct attack on press freedom

  1. Pingback: Headlines of the day I: Ham-handed spookery | eats shoots 'n leaves

  2. Bitethehand Reply

    20 August at 10:34

    “In an article in today’s Guardian, editor Alan Rusbridger reports that the newspaper was coerced into destroying material that related to its revelations about state surveillance.”

    There was a time when newspaper editors would have spent a few days in jail rather than give in the the government’s bully boys. Then the entire world would have heard. Now only the few people who manage to get a long way into Rusbridger’s article will know.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


More in Campaigns
Terrorism Act should not be used to intimidate journalists
Close