Index urges court to rethink ruling on "right to be forgotten"
30 May 2014

Index reiterates its concern at the ruling on the so-called “right to be forgotten” and its implications for free speech and access to information. Index urges the court to put a stay on its ruling while it pursues a regulatory framework that will provide legal oversight, an appeals process and ensure that private corporations are not the arbiters of public information.

While it is clearly understandable that individuals should want to be able to control their online presence, the court’s ruling fails to offer sufficient checks and balances to ensure that a desire to alter search requests so that they reflect a more “accurate” profile does not simply become a mechanism for censorship and whitewashing of history.

Issued without a clearly defined structure to police the requests, the court ruling has outsourced what should be the responsibility of publicly accountable bodies to private corporations who are under no obligations to protect human rights or act in public interest. Index will be monitoring very closely the processes and procedures used by Google and others to make decisions.

Although Google has devised an advisory committee to support its decision-making, the fact remains that we are in a situation in which search engines will be making decisions about what is deemed “irrelevant and inappropriate” – and a situation that fails to take into account the fact that information deemed “irrelevant” now may become extremely relevant in future.

Index urges the court to go back and reconsider its directions to search engines. It must devise a clear structure for managing requests that balances the public’s right to information, freedom of expression and privacy rights.

For more information call: +44 (0) 207 260 2660


Both Google and the European Union are funders of Index on Censorship



2 responses to “Index urges court to rethink ruling on “right to be forgotten””

  1. This i even more stupid,The right to be forgotten?to suppress past information cause some one is having personal problem with it ?this usually hurt the hungry information public which has rights,just as consumers do.This forget the past is another way of controlling people minds for power

  2. John says:

    Index is going too far on this. It is only reasonable that outdated or wrong or illegal data should be removed. google makes money from being a search engine via its advertising and with the provision of the data and the making of lots of money it is fair that it spends some money and effort being responsible. If it really disagrees then it should discontinue its service in the jurisdictions concerned because google is not and must not ever be above the law. Choose.

Index logo white

Join us to protect and promote freedom of speech in the UK and across the world.
Since 1972, Index on Censorship has been leading the campaign for free expression.
Our award-winning magazine originally provided the platform for the untold stories of dissidents and resistance from behind the Iron Curtain and is now a home for some of the greatest campaigning writers of our age.
Journalistic freedom, artistic expression, the right to protest, the right to speak your mind, wherever you live.  These are the founding principles of Index on Censorship.
So join us, by subscribing to our newsletter or making a donation, to use your voice to ensure that everyone else can be heard too.
Go to the Index on Censorship home page