NEWS
Sri Lanka: Colombo Telegraph facing censorship despite presidential promise

Letter: Sri Lanka must investigate the recent illegal blocking of online access to the Colombo Telegraph

24 Jul 2015
BY ROHAN JAYASEKERA

colombo-telegraphThe Colombo Telegraph, Sri Lanka’s most iconoclastic investigative news website, is gearing up for this year’s second national election. And once again they face the threat of censorship — despite a presidential promise to bring it to an end.

January’s polls saw the website blocked to domestic voters by order of authoritarian incumbent president Mahinda Rajapaksa. Unseated by shock winner Maithripala Sirisena, one of the victor’s first acts after the vote was to lift the official banning order.

Unfortunately his officials didn’t get the memo and simply resorted to more subtle and illegal censorship. Their covert interference was exposed by the Colombo Telegraph just a month later, drawing a personal apology from the minister responsible, Mangala Samaraweera, and a promise of a full investigation.

That promised investigation has so far come to nothing, while the later announcement of a general election for August 18 has raised political tensions. This week eight international freedom of expression groups, including Index on Censorship, wrote to Samaraweera reminding him of his promise.

“The media must be free to cover the upcoming campaigns without fear of interference, covert or overt, online or off,” said the groups. Censorship, legal or illegal, may fall hard on independent voices like the Colombo Telegraph unless the state’s secret censors are found and stopped.

Colombo Telegraph editor Uvindu Kurukulasuriya is calling on the government to complete the inquiry as soon as possible and guarantee that the media will be free to report the campaign.

But the Colombo Telegraph has few friends among the current government, led by United National Party prime minister Ranil Wickremesinghe.

The government has been embarrassed by the site’s publication of parts of a leaked 19-page draft parliamentary committee report into an alleged government bond scam linked to Central Bank Governor Arjuna Mahendran and his son-in-law. The dissolution of parliament would have buried its detailed allegations had it not been leaked.

Wickremesinghe said the draft report was ‘false and perverted’ and has no official status. This did not stop him threatening media that cite it with prosecution under an act prohibiting sharing details of committee proceedings before they are presented to parliament itself. The use of the act – much criticised by independent media who have called for its repeal – is designed to deter other journalists following up the story during the election campaign.

Media rights are suddenly looking shaky across the country. Despite pledging to introduce a Right to Information Act as a key part of the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe government’s first 100 days in power, they failed to deliver. And the ruling party set the tone for the election campaign by reportedly pressing state media to downplay coverage of the start of Rajapakse’s bid to return to power as prime minister.

Meanwhile the threat of more illegal online censorship remains as long as the original crime remains un-investigated. It took a careful study by the site’s technical advisers in Denmark to discover that what appeared to be poor connections to some of the site’s more controversial news pages, was in fact targeted interference.

The source of the interference was traced to a server in the central office of Sri Lanka Telecom at the OTS Building in Lotus Road in Colombo.

Websites can be “prohibited or be subject to supervision and control” under section 69 of the Sri Lanka Telecommunications Act 1991 – but only under ministerial authority, and under a publicly announced order. No such order was made to replace the one lifted by Sirisena.

Kurukulasuriya’s online news site, run by volunteers for four years, has developed a strong record of controversial scoops backed with an impressive array of documentation.

“We’ve never supported any particular political party, organisation or individual over another, and have proven it over the years. We just want our site to continue as an independent media organisation without unnecessary legal interference or illegal censorship.”

Rohan Jayasekera

Rohan Jayasekera is a journalist, editor and online free expression advocate, tracking human rights, digital media, cultures of change and the conflict zeitgeist.

5 responses to “Sri Lanka: Colombo Telegraph facing censorship despite presidential promise”

  1. Yawn yawn says:

    It’s all about freedom of speech.

  2. Yawn yawn says:

    Democracy is all about freedom of speech it’s as simple as that .

  3. Scorpio says:

    I find the Telegraph an intellectual paper that is worth reading, there is nothing malicious in their article . They are definitely not biased, the minute they start praising the Present government, all censorship will be withdrawn. I give thumbs up to this paper.

  4. Scorpio says:

    Is this what the new good governance calls democracy.? The citizens of Sri Lanka should be given the right to read the pros and cons, not praise a government who is hiding their dirty linen. Even if these papers are censored the people of the country are not morons, they know how to make up their minds and choose the ruler, there are papers like DM who are pro RW and I do not read them.

  5. gigurawa says:

    Colombo telegraph is one of hundreds of websites that have sprung up in the recent years. Out of them it is the most partisan and bised. It , rather than iconoclastic, is the purveyor of malicious, vindictive, vicious, baseless propaganda for antinational, unpatriotic sri lankans living a double life in colombo and also western conspiracist. many of the correspondents, it seems, are in the payroll of foreign vested interests. In essence, this website is hellbent on subverting the voice of the majority of people living in Sri Lanka.
    Its mask will be removed shortly, the mask of the vociferous minority with their questionable loyalty to the country of their birth, in the name of justice for the silent, decent, honest, silent majority who believe in a future for their children and grand children.